Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of a Hospital Electronic Surgical Registry in a Lower-Middle-Income Country

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

While the benefits of using electronic health records (EHRs) in both developed and low- and middle-income countries are known, the barriers to implementing EHRs in lower-middle-income countries have not been fully characterized. We assessed organizational readiness for implementation of a mobile (tablet-based) EHR, to create a real-time electronic surgical registry, in a busy lower-middle-income country hospital.

Methods

Six semi-structured focus groups were conducted with hospital administrators, faculty surgeons, surgical residents, interns, nurses and medical students in a large urban hospital in Asuncion, Paraguay. Focus groups were conducted over the course of three weeks during the pre-implementation phase to identify barriers to implementation. Focus group data were coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which are 12 validated domains related to behavior change.

Results

Reinforcement, environmental context/resources and roles/responsibilities were the most relevant TDF domains that emerged. Residents and students were more uncertain than faculty and department heads about who would enforce the use of the tool in place of paper charting. Internet quality was a concern raised by all. The local, normative hierarchical structure within the surgical department, including piecemeal communication between the department heads and the residents about roles and responsibilities, was a major perceived barrier to implementation.

Conclusions

Uncertainties about reinforcement, roles and responsibilities for using a novel EHR tool, and technology infrastructure are potential barriers to address in the pre-implementation phase of introducing an EHR to a lower-middle-income country surgical service. Addressing these potential barriers with all stakeholders prior to implementation will be a critical next step in this effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zargaran E, Schuurman N, Nicol AJ et al (2014) The electronic trauma health record: design and usability of a novel tablet-based tool for trauma care and injury surveillance in low resource settings. J Am Coll Surg 218(1):41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kesinger MR, Nagy LR, Sequeira DJ et al (2014) Standardized trauma care protocol decreased in-hospital mortality of patients with severe traumatic brain injury at a teaching hospital in a middle-income country. Injury 45(9):1350–1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiner BJ (2009) A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci 4:67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. McGinn CA, Grenier S, Duplantie J et al (2011) Comparison of user groups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med 28(9):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biruk S, Yilma T, Andualem M et al (2014) Heath professional’s readiness to implement electronic medical record system at three hospitals in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12(14):155

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adams A, Sedalia S, McNab S et al (2015) Lessons learned in using realist evaluation to assess maternal and newborn health programming in rural Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan 31(2):267–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Storeng KT, Mishra A (2014) Politics and practices of global health: critical ethnographies of health systems. Glob Public Health. 9(8):858–864

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S (2012) Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behavior change and implementation research. Implement Sci 7:37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirbaha F, Shalviri G, Yazdizadeh B et al (2015) Perceived barriers to reporting adverse drug events in hospitals: a qualitative study using theoretical domains framework approach. Implement Sci 7(10):110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stemler S (2001) An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 7(17):137–146

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruse CS, Kothman K, Anerobi K et al (2016) Adoption factors of the electronic health record: a systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 4(2):e19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Odero W, Rotich J, Yiannoutsos CT et al (2007) Innovative approaches to application of information technology in disease surveillance and prevention in Western Kenya. J Biomed Inform 40:390–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schooley B, Walczak S, Hikmet N et al (2016) Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care. Int J Med Inform 88:62–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health, Grant #1R25TW009714-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohini Dasari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any potential or real conflicts of interests to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dasari, M., Garbett, M., Miller, E. et al. Implementation of a Hospital Electronic Surgical Registry in a Lower-Middle-Income Country. World J Surg 40, 2840–2846 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3654-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3654-3

Keywords

Navigation