Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Compliance of Clinical Pathways in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Different Implementation Methods

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Clinical pathways aim to standardize perioperative and postoperative care of surgical procedures and are shown to result in a significant optimization associated with cost reduction. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of two different implementations forms of clinical pathways on the pathway compliance and resulting costs.

Methods

Data of patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were collected over two different periods: using a clinical pathway in the form of a paper-based checklist, or a clinical pathway integrated into the paper-based medical treatment and nursing documentation. Outcome measures were compliance of the clinical pathway and total costs per case.

Results

The compliance was significantly higher using integrated pathways compared to paper-based checklists (n = 117 of 123, 95 % vs 54 of 118, 46 %; p < 0.001). Mean total costs (€2206 vs €2458, p = 0.027) and length of hospital stay (2.13 vs 2.77 days, p < 0.001) were significantly reduced by the integrated clinical pathway compared to checklists. Further, the variation of costs per case and variation of length of hospital stay were significantly smaller with integrated clinical pathway (±€440 vs ±€538, p = 0.039 and ±0.53 vs ±0.68 days, p < 0.001, respectively). No difference regarding postoperative complication was observed (n = 3 vs. 4 events; p = 0.67).

Conclusion

Integrated clinical pathways display a significant higher compliance compared to checklists resulting in reduced total costs, shorter hospital stay and a smaller variation of cost, making it a useful tool in process controlling and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E et al (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3(3):CD006632

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D et al (2009) Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(1):31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulkarni RP, Ituarte PH, Gunderson D et al (2011) Clinical pathways improve hospital resource use in endocrine surgery. J Am Coll Surg 212(1):35–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hubner M, Addor V, Slieker J et al (2015) The impact of an enhanced recovery pathway on nursing workload: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 24((Pt. A)):45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pritts TA, Nussbaum MS, Flesch LV et al (1999) Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and cost for bowel resection. Ann Surg 230(5):728–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hyde E, Murphy B (2012) Computerized clinical pathways (care plans): piloting a strategy to enhance quality patient care. Clin Nurse Spec 26(5):277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lap choly pathway leads to efficiency (1997) savings. Hosp Case Manag 5(7):125–128

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Klei WA, Hoff RG, van Aarnhem EE et al (2012) Effects of the introduction of the WHO “Surgical Safety Checklist” on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study. Ann Surg 255(1):44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergs J, Lambrechts F, Simons P et al (2015) Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of surgical safety checklists: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. BMJ Qual Saf 24(12):776–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M et al (2009) Zurich Fast Track Study G. A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136(3):842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomassen O, Brattebo G, Heltne JK et al (2010) Checklists in the operating room: help or hurdle? A qualitative study on health workers’ experiences. BMC Health Serv Res 10:342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pierce JL, Jussila I (2010) Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: construct introduction and elaboration. J Organ Behav 31(6):810–834. doi:10.1002/job.628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hannam JA, Glass L, Kwon J et al (2013) A prospective, observational study of the effects of implementation strategy on compliance with a surgical safety checklist. BMJ Qual Saf 22(11):940–947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L et al (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38(6):1531–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamaki S, Satoi S, Toyokawa H et al (2013) The clinical role of critical pathway implementation for pancreaticoduodenectomy in 179 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(3):271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Quality Management, Medical and Business Development, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany

    Martin Holderried

  2. Clinic for Visceral, General and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhörnlestrasse 22, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Claudius Falch, Andreas Kirschniak, Alfred Koenigsrainer & Sven Muller

  3. Division of Economics and Management of Social Services, within the Institute of Health Care and Public Management, Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany

    Martin Holderried, Rebecca Hummel, Christian Ernst & Sven Muller

Authors
  1. Martin Holderried
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca Hummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudius Falch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Kirschniak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alfred Koenigsrainer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Ernst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sven Muller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Muller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holderried, M., Hummel, R., Falch, C. et al. Compliance of Clinical Pathways in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Different Implementation Methods. World J Surg 40, 2888–2891 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3645-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3645-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation