Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Impact of Further Treatments on Distant Metastasis in Patients With Minimally Invasive Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma: Verification Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of further treatments in minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma (MIFTC) patients.

Methods

The risk factors for distant metastases were analyzed, and the impact of surgical extent on distant metastasis was verified by using weighted logistic regression models with inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results

166 patients including 31 males (18.7 %) and 135 females (81.3 %), with the mean age of 41.5 ± 13.5 years, were enrolled for this study. The median follow-up period was 103.5 months (range, 13–244 months). Seven patients (4.2 %) had distant metastases during follow-up period. The presence of vascular invasion (Hazard ratio [HR] = 29.06; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] = 3.06–209.08; p = 0.015) and extensive vascular invasion ≥4 foci (HR = 40.57; 95 % CI = 2.09–789.13; p = 0.014) were the independent risk factors for distant metastasis by multivariate analysis. Surgical extent did not influence distant metastasis. Logistic regression with IPTW also demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences in the development of distant metastasis based on surgical extent (HR = 1.28; 95 % CI = 0.15–10.87; p = 0.823).

Conclusions

The presence of extensive vascular invasion is the most powerful predictor of distant metastasis. However, it is noteworthy that further treatments do not demonstrate an advantageous effect on preventing distant metastasis during the follow-up period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeLellis R, Lloyd R, Heitz P et al (2004) WHO classification of tumours pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sugino K, Kameyama K, Nagahama M et al (2014) Does completion thyroidectomy improve the outcome of patients with minimally invasive follicular carcinoma of the thyroid? Ann Surg Oncol 21(9):2981–2986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Neill CJ, Vaughan L, Learoyd DL et al (2011) Management of follicular thyroid carcinoma should be individualised based on degree of capsular and vascular invasion. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(2):181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugino K, Kameyama K, Ito K et al (2012) Outcomes and prognostic factors of 251 patients with minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 22(8):798–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ito Y, Hirokawa M, Masuoka H et al (2013) Prognostic factors of minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma: extensive vascular invasion significantly affects patient prognosis. Endocr J 60(5):637–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Avanzo A, Treseler P, Ituarte PH et al (2004) Follicular thyroid carcinoma: histology and prognosis. Cancer 100(6):1123–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Collini P, Sampietro G, Pilotti S (2004) Extensive vascular invasion is a marker of risk of relapse in encapsulated non-hürthle cell follicular carcinoma of the thyroid gland: a clinicopathological study of 18 consecutive cases from a single institution with a 11-year median follow-up. Hisopathology 44(1):35–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lo CY, Chan WF, Lam KY et al (2005) Follicular thyroid carcinoma: the role of histology and staging systems in predicting survival. Ann Surg 242(5):708–715

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Asari R, Koperek O, Scheuba C et al (2009) Follicular thyroid carcinoma in an iodine-replete endemic goiter region: a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed clinical trial. Ann Surg 249(6):1023–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Besic N, Zgajnar J, Hocevar M et al (2005) Is patient’s age a prognostic factor for follicular thyroid carcinoma in the TNM classification system? Thyroid 15(5):439–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Witte J, Goretzki PE, Dieken J et al (2002) Importance of lymph node metastases in follicular thyroid cancer. World J Surg 26(8):1017–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ito Y, Hirokawa M, Higashiyama T et al (2007) Prognosis and prognostic factors of follicular carcinoma in Japan: importance of postoperative pathological examination. World J Surg 31(7):1417–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugino K, Ito K, Nagahama M et al (2011) Prognosis and prognostic factors for distant metastases and tumor mortality in follicular thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 21(7):751–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Source of funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Ho Yoon.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, YM., Lee, Y.H., Song, D.E. et al. Prognostic Impact of Further Treatments on Distant Metastasis in Patients With Minimally Invasive Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma: Verification Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting. World J Surg 41, 138–145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3608-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3608-9

Keywords

Navigation