Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnosis and Management of Bile Leaks After Hepatectomy: Results of a Prospective Analysis of 475 Hepatectomies

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis and management of bile leaks after hepatectomy are heterogeneous because there is no agreement on the definition of post-hepatectomy biliary fistula. The aim of this study was to validate our definition and management of biliary fistulas after hepatic resection and to compare our results with those proposed by other authors.

Methods

A prospective series of patients who underwent hepatic resection from 2004 to 2012 were established. Drains were maintained for 7 days, and bilirubin was measured on postoperative days (PODs) 3, 5, and 7. Drains were removed if the bilirubin on POD 7 was less than that on POD 5 and less than 171 µmol/l (10 mg/dl). A statistical analysis of prognostic factors for biliary fistula was performed.

Results

Among 475 consecutive patients, 39 (8 %) had biliary fistulas. Only 8 (1.7 %) patients required postoperative interventions. In comparison with other studies, we observed a higher rate of bile leaks, but at the same time, we observed a lower rate of interventional procedures. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on POD 7 had the highest predictive value (0.81; P < 0.001). Pringle maneuvers lasting ≥90 min (OR = 3.4; P < 0.001), extended resections (OR = 6.4; P = 0.007), blood transfusions (OR = 2.4; P = 0.035), and resections including segment I (OR = 1.9; P = 0.033) or segment V (OR = 1.8; P = 0.024) were independently associated with an increased risk of bile leak.

Conclusions

The proposed definition of biliary fistula provides effective recognition of those that are clinically relevant with a reduction of the risk of unrecognized collections and minimal postoperative morbidity. Registration Number: NCT02056028 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg 240(4):698–710

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL et al (1998) Biliary complications after hepatic resection: risk factors, management, and outcome. Arch Surg 133(2):156–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A et al (1993) Drainage after elective hepatic resection. A randomized trial. Ann Surg 218(6):748–753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K et al (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171(1):158–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239(2):194–201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Torzilli G, Olivari N, Del Fabbro D et al (2005) Bilirubin level fluctuation in drain discharge after hepatectomies justifies long-term drain maintenance. Hepatogastroenterology 52(64):1206–1210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg 93(4):422–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kyoden Y, Imamura H, Sano K et al (2010) Value of prophylactic abdominal drainage in 1269 consecutive cases of elective liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(2):186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Moriguchi M et al (2012) Criteria for drain removal following liver resection. Br J Surg 99(11):1584–1590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for Liver Surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB (Oxford) 17:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Vigano L et al (2006) Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk? Arch Surg 141(7):690–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cescon M, Vetrone G, Grazi GL et al (2009) Trends in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1500 consecutive unselected cases over 20 years. Ann Surg 249(6):995–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillaud A, Pery C, Campillo B et al (2013) Incidence and predictive factors of clinically relevant bile leakage in the modern era of liver resections. HPB (Oxford) 15(3):224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N et al (2003) One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg 138(11):1198–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236(4):397–407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M et al (2012) Bilirubin level in the drainage fluid is an early and independent predictor of clinically relevant bile leakage after hepatic resection. Surgery 152(5):821–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reissfelder C, Rahbari NN, Koch M et al (2011) Postoperative course and clinical significance of biochemical blood tests following hepatic resection. Br J Surg 98(6):836–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Taguchi Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y et al (2014) The determination of bile leakage in complex hepatectomy based on the guidelines of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. World J Surg 38(1):168–176. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2252-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Abdalla EK et al (2004) Is extended hepatectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy justified? Ann Surg 239(5):722–732

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamashita Y, Hamatsu T, Rikimaru T et al (2001) Bile leakage after hepatic resection. Ann Surg 233(1):45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Belghiti J, Clavien P, Gadzijev E et al (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB (Oxford) 2(3):333–339

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Imamura H, Sano K, Sugawara Y et al (2005) Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection: decision tree incorporating indocyanine green test. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12(1):16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Donadon M, Cimino M, Procopio F et al (2013) Potential role of cholinesterases to predict short-term outcome after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Updates Surg 65(1):11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Torzilli G, Montorsi M, Donadon M et al (2005) “Radical but conservative” is the main goal for ultrasonography-guided liver resection: prospective validation of this approach. J Am Coll Surg 201(4):517–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Torzilli G, Donadon M, Marconi M et al (2008) Systematic extended right posterior sectionectomy: a safe and effective alternative to right hepatectomy. Ann Surg 247(4):603–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Torzilli G, Donadon M, Palmisano A et al (2009) Ultrasound guided liver resection: does this approach limit the need for portal vein embolization? Hepatogastroenterology 56(94–95):1483–1490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Torzilli G, Palmisano A, Procopio F et al (2010) A new systematic small for size resection for liver tumors invading the middle hepatic vein at its caval confluence: mini-mesohepatectomy. Ann Surg 251(1):33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Torzilli G, Garancini M, Donadon M et al (2010) Intraoperative ultrasonographic detection of communicating veins between adjacent hepatic veins during hepatectomy for tumours at the hepatocaval confluence. Br J Surg 97(12):1867–1873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ijichi M, Takayama T, Toyoda H et al (2000) Randomized trial of the usefulness of a bile leakage test during hepatic resection. Arch Surg 135(12):1395–1400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Torzilli G, Makuuchi M, Inoue K et al (1999) No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients: is there a way? A prospective analysis of our approach. Arch Surg 134(9):984–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K et al (2001) Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg 136(8):922–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lesurtel M, Selzner M, Petrowsky H et al (2005) How should transection of the liver be performed?: a prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients: comparing four different transection strategies. Ann Surg 242(6):814–823

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gurusamy KS, Pamecha V, Sharma D et al (2009) Techniques for liver parenchymal transection in liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):Cd006880

  36. Vigano L, Ferrero A, Sgotto E et al (2008) Bile leak after hepatectomy: predictive factors of spontaneous healing. Am J Surg 196(2):195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary & General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy

    Matteo Donadon, Guido Costa, Matteo Cimino, Fabio Procopio, Daniele Del Fabbro, Angela Palmisano & Guido Torzilli

Authors
  1. Matteo Donadon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guido Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matteo Cimino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabio Procopio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniele Del Fabbro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Angela Palmisano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guido Torzilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Donadon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donadon, M., Costa, G., Cimino, M. et al. Diagnosis and Management of Bile Leaks After Hepatectomy: Results of a Prospective Analysis of 475 Hepatectomies. World J Surg 40, 172–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3143-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3143-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation