Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Is General Surgery Still Relevant to the Subspecialised Trainee?” A 10 Year Comparison of General Versus Specialty Surgical Practice

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The splintering of general surgery into subspecialties in the past decade has brought into question the relevance of a continued emphasis on traditional general surgical training. With the majority of trainees now expressing a preference to subspecialise early, this study sought to identify if the requirement for proficiency in managing general surgical conditions has reduced over the past decade through comparison of general and specialty surgical admissions at a tertiary referral center.

Methods

A cross-sectional review of all surgical admissions at Cork University Hospital was performed at three individual time points: 2002, 2007 & 2012. Basic demographic details of both elective & emergency admissions were tabulated & analysed. Categorisation of admissions into specialty relevant or general surgery was made using International guidelines.

Results

11,288 surgical admissions were recorded (2002:2773, 2007:3498 & 2012:5017), showing an increase of 81 % over the 10-year period. While growth in overall service provision was seen, the practice of general versus specialty relevant emergency surgery showed no statistically significant change in practice from 2002 to 2012 (p = 0.87). General surgery was mostly practiced in the emergency setting (84 % of all emergency admissions in 2012) with only 28 % elective admissions for general surgery. A reduction in length of stay was seen in both elective (3.62–2.58 bed days, p = 0.342) & emergency admissions (7.36–5.65, p = 0.026).

Conclusions

General surgical emergency work continues to constitute a major part of the specialists practice. These results emphasize the importance of general surgical training even for those trainees committed to sub-specialisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Longo WE, Sumpio B, Duffy A, Seashore J, Udelsman R (2008) Early specialisation in surgery: the new frontier. Yale J Biol Med 81:187–191

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Irish Medical News, Article 11/2/13. Available at: http://www.rcsi.ie/index.jsp?a=2524&n=1220&p=1204. Accessed 08 Sept 2013

  3. Allgood PC, Bachmann MO (2006) Effects of specialisation on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study. Br J Cancer 94(1):36–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parks RW, Bettschart V, Frame S, Stockton DL, Brewster DH, Garden OJ (2004) Benefits of specialisation in the management of pancreatic cancer: results of a Scottish population-based study. Br J Cancer 91(3):459–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nambiar RM (1995) General surgery in an era of superspecialisation—what is the future? Ann Acad Med Singap 24(1):180–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmed HM, Gale SC, Tinti MS, Shiroff AM, Macias AC, Rhodes SC et al (2012) Creation of an emergency surgery service concentrates resident training in general surgical procedures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(3):599–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Health Services Executive, Republic of Ireland. Available at: http://www.cuh.hse.ie/About_CUH/. Accessed 08 Sept 2013

  9. Wiley MM (2005) Using HIPE data as a research and planning tool: limitations and opportunities: a response. Ir J Med Sci 174:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McHugh SM, Loh KP, Corrigan MA, Sheikh A, Lehane E, Hill AD (2012) Patientsmate©: the implementation and evaluation of an online prospective audit system. J Eval Clin Pract 18(2):365–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), minimum case list for Colon and Rectal Surgery. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/060_CRS_Minimum_Case_Numbers.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2013

  12. The American Board of Surgery. SCORE Core Curriculum for Vascular Surgery Residents. Available at: http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certvsqe_primarycert. Accessed 22 Oct 2013

  13. Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme (ISCP), Competency in Breast Surgery Section, page 26. Available at: https://www.iscp.ac.uk/static/syllabus2013/gs_curric_2013.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2013

  14. Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, North America. Available at: http://my.clevelandclinic.org/endocrinology-metabolism/departments-centers/endocrine-surgery.aspx. Accessed 22 Oct 2013

  15. Michelassi Fabrizio (2011) American board of surgery certificate in general complex surgical oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2405–2406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Central Statistics Office, Ireland. Available at: http://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/healthandsocialconditions/publiclyfundedacutehospitalsstatistics2009/. Accessed 08 Sept 2013

  17. Gillman LM, Vergis A (2013) General surgery graduates may be ill prepared to enter rural or community surgical practice. Am J Surg 205(6):752–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coleman JJ, Esposito TJ, Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV (2013) Early subspecialisation and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready? J Am Coll Surg 216(4):764–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Breen KJ, Hogan AM, Mealy K (2013) The detrimental impact of the implementation of the European working time directive (EWTD) on surgical senior house officer (SHO) operative experience. Ir J Med Sci 182(3):383–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to extend an acknowledgement to all staff in the HIPE department at Cork University Hospital for their time and contribution towards data sourcing for this study. I would also like to thank all the surgical staff at Cork University Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. Fleming.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fleming, C.A., Khan, Z., Andrews, E.J. et al. “Is General Surgery Still Relevant to the Subspecialised Trainee?” A 10 Year Comparison of General Versus Specialty Surgical Practice. World J Surg 39, 297–302 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2890-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2890-7

Keywords

Navigation