Abstract
Background
Clinicians often encounter left pleural effusion after esophagectomy, which sometimes necessitates thoracentesis. We have introduced a new drainage method, bilateral pleural drainage by single Blake drain (BDSD), which we have been using since April 2013. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the BDSD.
Methods
The BDSD method employs a 15-F Blake drain inserted from the right thoracic cavity to the left thoracic cavity across the posterior mediastinum. The conventional drain (CD) group consisted of 50 patients with a 19-F Blake drain placed in the right thoracic cavity during the period from April 2012 to March 2013. The BDSD group consisted of 54 patients treated from April 2013 to June 2014.
Results
The amount of total drainage in the BDSD group was significantly higher than that in the CD group (P < 0.0001). The rates of left pleural effusion and left lower lobe atelectasis in the BDSD group were significantly lower than those in the CD group (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). No patients developed a left pleural effusion necessitating thoracentesis drainage in the BDSD group.
Conclusions
Compared with the conventional method, BDSD was able to evacuate bilateral pleural effusion more effectively, and the incidences of left pleural effusion and left atelectasis were lower. This method is therefore clinically useful after esophagectomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Takuya S, Shunzo H, Tetsuya A et al (2011) The method of placing and management of the Blake drain with bilateral pleural drainage after esophageal surgery in Japanese. Shujutsu Oper 65:1–5
Fukui T, Sakakura N, Kobayashi R et al (2009) Comparison of methods for placing and managing a silastic drain after pulmonary resection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9:645–648
Sakakura N, Fukui T, Mori S et al (2009) Fluid drainage and air evacuation characteristics of Blake and conventional drains used after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1539–1545
Sakopoulos AG, Hurwitz AS, Suda RW et al (2005) Efficacy of Blake drains for mediastinal and pleural drainage following cardiac operations. J Card Surg 20:574–577
Icard P, Chautard J, Zhang X et al (2006) A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:649–651
Roberts N, Boehm M, Bates M et al (2006) Two-center prospective randomized controlled trial of Blake versus Portex drains after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:1042–1046
Nakamura H, Taniguchi Y, Miwa K et al (2009) The use of Blake drains following general thoracic surgery: is it an acceptable option? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 8:58–61
Kamiyoshihara M, Nagashima T, Ibe T (2010) A proposal for management after lung resection, using a flexible silastic drain. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 18:435–442
Moss E, Miller CS, Jensen H et al (2013) A randomized trial of early versus delayed mediastinal drain removal after cardiac surgery using silastic and conventional tubes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17:110–115
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niwa, Y., Koike, M., Oya, H. et al. Method of Bilateral Pleural Drainage by Single Blake Drain After Esophagectomy. World J Surg 39, 727–731 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2860-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2860-0