Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Delayed Laparotomy After Selective Non-operative Management of Penetrating Abdominal Injuries

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Main concern during the practice of selective non-operative management (SNOM) for abdominal stab wounds (SW) and gunshot wounds (GSW) is the potential for harm in patients who fail SNOM and receive a delayed laparotomy (DL). The aim of this study is to determine whether such patients suffer adverse sequelae because of delays in diagnosis and treatment when managed under a structured SNOM protocol.

Methods

190 patients underwent laparotomy after an abdominal GSW or SW (5/04–10/12). Patients taken to operation within 120 min of admission were included in the early laparotomy (EL) group (n =153, 80.5 %) and the remaining in the DL group (n =37, 19.5 %). Outcomes included mortality, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Results

The median time from hospital arrival to operation was 43 min (range: 17–119) for EL patients and 249 min (range: 122–1,545) for DL patients. The average number and type of injuries were similar among the groups. Mortality and negative laparotomy were observed only in the EL group. There was no significant difference in the hospital stay between the groups. The overall complications were higher in the EL group (44.4 vs. 24.3 %, p =0.026). DL was independently associated with a lower likelihood for complications (OR 0.39, 95 % CI 0.16–0.98, p =0.045). Individual review of all DL patients did not reveal an incident in which complications could be directly attributed to the delay.

Conclusions

In a structured protocol, patients who fail SNOM and require an operation are recognized and treated promptly. The delay in operation does not cause unnecessary morbidity or mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaftan GW (1969) Selective conservatism in penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma 9:1026–1028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McAlvanah MJ, Shaftan GW (1978) Selective conservatism in penetrating abdominal wounds: a continuing reappraisal. J Trauma 18:206–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demetriades D, Charalambides D, Lakhoo M et al (1991) Gunshot wound of the abdomen: role of selective conservative management. Br J Surg 78:220–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Demetriades D, Velmahos G, Cornwell E 3rd et al (1997) Selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds of the anterior abdomen. Arch Surg 132:178–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Cornwell EE 3rd (1998) Transpelvic gunshot wounds: routine laparotomy or selective management? World J Surg 22:1034–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Foianini E et al (1997) A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back. Am J Surg 174:342–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Toutouzas KG et al (2001) Selective nonoperative management in 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care? Ann Surg 234:395–402 discussion 402–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Como JJ, Bokhari F, Chiu WC et al (2010) Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma 68:721–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laing GL, Skinner DL, Bruce JL et al (2014) A multi faceted quality improvement programme results in improved outcomes for the selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma in a developing world trauma centre. Injury 45:327–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zafar SN, Rushing A, Haut ER et al (2012) Outcome of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injuries from the North American National Trauma Database. Br J Surg 99(Suppl 1):155–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hope WW, Smith ST, Medieros B et al (2012) Non-operative management in penetrating abdominal trauma: is it feasible at a Level II trauma center? J Emerg Med 43:190–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore EE, Moore JB, Van Duzer-Moore S et al (1980) Mandatory laparotomy for gunshot wounds penetrating the abdomen. Am J Surg 140:847–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe RJ, Saletta JD, Read DR et al (1977) Should laparotomy be mandatory or selective in gunshot wounds of the abdomen? J Trauma 17:903–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fikry K, Velmahos GC, Bramos A et al (2011) Successful selective nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds despite low penetrating trauma volumes. Arch Surg 146:528–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sosa JL, Arrillaga A, Puente I et al (1995) Laparoscopy in 121 consecutive patients with abdominal gunshot wounds. J Trauma 39:501–504 discussion 504–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schnuriger B, Lam L, Inaba K et al (2012) Negative laparotomy in trauma: are we getting better? Am Surg 78:1219–1223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Cornwell EE et al (1997) Gunshot wounds to the buttocks: predicting the need for operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40:307–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Miroslav P. Peev, Yuchiao Chang, David R. King, Daniel D. Yeh, Haytham Kaafarani, Peter J. Fagenholz, Marc A. De Moya & George C. Velmahos

Authors
  1. Miroslav P. Peev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuchiao Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David R. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel D. Yeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haytham Kaafarani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter J. Fagenholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marc A. De Moya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. George C. Velmahos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslav P. Peev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peev, M.P., Chang, Y., King, D.R. et al. Delayed Laparotomy After Selective Non-operative Management of Penetrating Abdominal Injuries. World J Surg 39, 380–386 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2813-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2813-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation