Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of Extended FAST in Blunt Chest Trauma: Is it the Time to be Used in the ATLS Algorithm?

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The clinical significance of extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST) for diagnosis of pneumothorax is not well defined.

Objectives

To investigate the utility of EFAST in blunt chest trauma (BCT) patients.

Study design

A single blinded, prospective study. Participants: All patients admitted with BCT (2011–2013).

Settings

Level 1 trauma center in Qatar.

Procedures and outcome measures

Patients were screened by EFAST and results were compared to the clinical examination (CE) and chest X-ray (CXR). Chest-computed tomography (CT) scoring system was used to confirm and measure the pneumothorax. Diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic modalities of pneumothorax was measured using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PVs), and likelihood ratio.

Results

A total of 305 BCT patients were included with median age of 34 (18–75). Chest CT was positive for pneumothorax in 75 (24.6 %) cases; of which 11 % had bilateral pneumothorax. Chest CT confirmed the diagnosis of pneumothorax in 43, 41, and 11 % of those who were initially diagnosed by EFAST, CE, and CXR, respectively. EFAST was positive in 42 hemithoraces and its sensitivity (43 %) was higher in comparison to CXR (11 %). Positive and negative PVs of EFAST were 76 and 92 %, respectively. The frequency of missed cases by CXR was higher in comparison to EFAST and CE. The lowest median score of missed pneumothorax was observed by EFAST.

Conclusion

EFAST can be used as an efficient triaging tool in BCT patients to rule out pneumothorax. Based on our analysis, we would recommend EFAST as an adjunct in ATLS algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ascher WM, Parvin S, Virgilio RW (1976) Echographic evaluation of splenic injury after blunt trauma. Radiology 118:411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kristensen JK, Buemann B, Keuhl E (1971) Ultrasonic scanning in the diagnosis of splenic haematomas. Acta Chir Scand 137:653–657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Schmidt JA, Frankel HL, Davis TP, Wang D et al (1995) A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment. J Trauma 39:492–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rozycki GS, Shackford SR (1996) Ultrasound, what every trauma surgeon should know. J Trauma 40:1–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (1997) Advanced Trauma Life Support Course for Physicians. American College of Surgeons, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  6. Di Bartolomeo S, Sanson G, Nardi G, Scian F, Michelutto V, Lattuada L (2001) A population-based study on pneumothorax in severely traumatized patients. J Trauma 51:677–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkerson RG, Stone MB (2010) Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med 17:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Laupland KB, Fox DL, Litvinchuk S, Dyer DM, Anderson IB, Hameed SM, Kortbeek JB, Mulloy R (2005) Factors related to the failure of radiographic recognition of occult posttraumatic pneumothoraces. Am J Surg 189:541–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Omar HR, Abdelmalak H, Mangar D, Rashad R, Helal E, Camporesi EM (2010) Occult pneumothorax, revisited. J Trauma Manag Outcomes 29(4):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Husain LF, Hagopian L, Wayman D, Baker WE, Carmody KA (2012) Sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax. J Emerg Trauma Shock 5:76–81

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Moya MA, Seaver C, Spaniolas K, Inaba K, Nguyen M, Veltman Y, Shatz D, Alam HB, Pizano L (2007) Occult pneumothorax in trauma patients: development of an objective scoring system. J Trauma 63:13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Lawrason J, Sackoff R, Oser A (1989) The frequency and significance of thoracic injuries detected on abdominal CT scans of multiple trauma patients. J Trauma. 29:502–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ball CG, Hameed SM, Evans D, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Canadian Trauma Trials Collaborative (2003) Occult pneumothorax in the mechanically ventilated trauma patient. Can J Surg 46:373–379

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang M, Liu ZH, Yang JX, Gan JX, Xu SW, You XD, Jiang GY (2006) Rapid detection of pneumothorax by ultrasonography in patients with multiple trauma. Crit Care 10:R112

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wernecke K, Galanski M, Peters PE, Hansen J (1987) Pneumothorax: evaluation by ultrasound–preliminary results. J Thorac Imaging 2:76–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dulchavsky SA, Schwarz KL, Kirkpatrick AW et al (2001) Prospective evaluation of thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax. J Trauma 50:201–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Knudtson JL, Dort JM, Helmer SD, Smith RS (2004) Surgeon-performed ultrasound for pneumothorax in the trauma suite. J Trauma 56:527–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB, Liu D, Rowan K, Ball CG, Hameed SM, Brown R, Simons R, Dulchavsky SA, Hamiilton DR, Nicolaou S (2004) Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma 57:288–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soldati G, Testa A, Sher S et al (2008) Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department. Chest 133:204–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alsalim W, Lewis D (2009) Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: is ultrasound or chest X ray best for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in the emergency department? Emerg Med J. 26:434–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nandipati KC, Allamaneni S, Kakarla R, Wong A et al (2012) Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) in the diagnosis of pneumothorax: experience at a community based level I trauma center. Chest 141:703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the Trauma surgery staff, database registry for their kind cooperation. All authors read the manuscript and approved it and had no financial issues to disclose. Medical Research Center (IRB# 9055/09) at Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar has approved the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yassir Abdulrahman.

Additional information

The present study has been accepted for presentation in part in The Trauma Association of Canada Annual Scientific Meeting, April 10–11, 2014 at the Centre Mont-Royal in Montreal, QC, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulrahman, Y., Musthafa, S., Hakim, S.Y. et al. Utility of Extended FAST in Blunt Chest Trauma: Is it the Time to be Used in the ATLS Algorithm?. World J Surg 39, 172–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2781-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2781-y

Keywords

Navigation