Skip to main content
Log in

Futility and the Care of Surgical Patients: Ethical Dilemmas

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Futility has been a contentious topic in medicine for several decades. Surgery in critical or end-of-life situations often raises difficult questions about futility. In this article, we discuss the definition of futility, methods for resolving futility disputes, and some ways to reframe the futility debate to a more fruitful discussion about the goals of care, better communication between surgeon and patient/surrogate, and palliative surgical care. Many definitions of futile therapy have been discussed. The most controversial of these is “qualitative futility” which describes a situation in which the treatment provided is likely to result in an unacceptable quality of life. This is an area of continued controversy because it has been impossible to identify universally held beliefs about acceptable quality of life. Many authors have described methods for resolving futility disputes, including community standards and legalistic multi-step due process protocols. Others, however, have abandoned the concept of futility altogether as an unhelpful term. Reframing the issue of futility as one of inadequate physician–patient communication, these authors have advocated for methods of improving communication and strengthening the patient–physician relationship. Finally, we discuss the utilization of consultants who may be of use in resolving futility disputes: ethics committees, palliative care specialists, pastoral care teams, and dedicated patient advocates. Involving these specialists in a futility conflict can help improve communication and provide invaluable assistance in arriving at the appropriate treatment decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Helft PR, Siegler M, Lantos J (2000) The rise and fall of the futility movement. N Engl J Med 343:293–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCullough LB, Jones JW (2001) Postoperative futility: a clinical algorithm for setting limits. Br J Surg 88:1153–1154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones JW, McCullough LB (2002) Futility and surgical intervention. J Vasc Surg 35:1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grossman E, Angelos P (2009) Futility: what Cool Hand Luke can teach the surgical community. World J Surg 33:1338–1340. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-9997-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardagh M (2000) Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine. J Med Ethics 26:396–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NAS (1995) Wrong medicine: doctors, patients, and futile treatment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker J, Jonsen AR (1990) Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med 112:949–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Singer EA (2001) Medical Futility: hippocratic fact or contemporary fiction?. Georgetown University, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark PA, Mikus CM (2000) Time for a formalized medical futility policy: Mercy Health System’s procedures will help free its physicians from legal concerns. Health Prog 81:24–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomlinson T, Brody H (1988) Ethics and communication in do-not-resuscitate orders. N Engl J Med 318:43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singer E (2001) Medical futility: hippocratic fact or contemporary fiction?. Georgetown University, Washington, DC, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halevy A, Brody BA (1996) A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futility. JAMA 276:571–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paris JJ, Casse EJ, Dec GW et al (1999) Use of a DNR order over family objections: the case of Gilgunn v. MGH. J Intensive Care Med 14:41–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Veatch RM, Spicer CM (1992) Medically futile care: the role of the physician in setting limits. Am J Law Med 18:15–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anonymous (1999) Texas Advance Directives Act, in Texas Health and Safety Code. Ch 166

  16. Zientek D (2005) The Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999: an exercise in futility? HEC Forum 17:245–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith M, Gremillion G, Slomka J et al (2007) Texas hospitals’ experience with the Texas Advance Directives Act. Critl Care Med 35:1271–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anonymous (1999) Medical futility in end-of-life care: report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. JAMA 281:937–941

  19. Pellegrino E (2000) Decision at the end of life: use and abuse of the concept of futility. Citta del Vatticano, Libreria Editrice Vaticano

  20. Schwarze ML, Bradley CT, Brasel KJ (2010) Surgical “buy-in”: the contractual relationship between surgeons and patients that influences decisions regarding life-supporting therapy. Crit Care Med 38:843–848

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarze ML, Redmann AJ, Alexander GC et al (2013) Surgeons expect patients to buy-in to postoperative life support preoperatively: results of a national survey. Crit Care Med 41:1–8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Demme R, Singer EA, Greenlaw J et al (2006) Ethical issues in palliative care. Anesthesiol Clin 24:129–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rabkin MT, Gillerman G, Rice NR (1976) Orders not to resuscitate. N Engl J Med 295:364–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Truog RD (1991) “Do-not-resuscitate” orders during anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiology 74:606–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walker RM (1991) DNR in the OR: resuscitation as an operative risk. JAMA 266:2407–2412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Youngner SJ, Cascorbi HF, Shuck JM (1991) DNR in the operating room: not really a paradox. JAMA 266:2433–2434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen CB, Cohen PJ (1991) Do-not-resuscitate orders in the operating room. N Engl J Med 325:1879–1882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anonymous (1994) Statement of the American College of Surgeons on Advance Directives by Patients: “do not resuscitate” in the operating room. Bull Am Coll Surg 79:29

  29. Hamblet J, Baker JD, Broussard GM et al (1994) Proposed AORN position statement on perioperative care of patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders: Association of Operating Room Nurses. AORN J 60:648–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. American Society of Anesthesiologists (2013) Ethical guidelines for the anesthesia care of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders or other directives that limit treatment. http://www.asahq.org/Home/For-Members/Clinical-Information/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements. Accessed 1 Dec 2013

  31. Truog RD, Waisel DB, Burns JP (1999) DNR in the OR: a goal directed approach. Anesthesiology 90:289–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dunn GP, Martensen R, Weissman D (eds) (2009) Surgical palliative care: a resident’s guide. American College of Surgeons, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bradley C, Brasel K (2009) Developing guidelines that identify patients who would benefit from palliative care services in the surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 37:946–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Huynh T, Kleerup EC, Wiley JF et al (2013) The frequency and cost of treatment perceived to be futile in critical care. JAMA Intern Med 173:1887–1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical risk calculator. www.acsnsqip.org/. Accessed 1 Dec 2013

  36. Bilimoria K, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217:833–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (P30CA072720).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric A. Singer.

Additional information

S. B. Grant and P. K. Modi have contributed equally towards this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grant, S.B., Modi, P.K. & Singer, E.A. Futility and the Care of Surgical Patients: Ethical Dilemmas. World J Surg 38, 1631–1637 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2592-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2592-1

Keywords

Navigation