Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative Complications Do Not Affect Long-Term Outcome in Esophageal Cancer Patients

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As esophagectomy is associated with a considerable complication rate, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative complications and neoadjuvant treatment on long-term outcome of adenocarcinoma (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients.

Methods

Altogether, 134 patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy between 2005 and 2010 with intrathoracic stapler anastomosis were included in the study. Postoperative complications were allocated into three main categories: overall complications, acute anastomotic insufficiency, and pulmonary complications. Data were collected prospectively and reviewed retrospectively for the purpose of this study.

Results

SCC patients suffered significantly more often from overall and pulmonary complications (SCC vs. EAC: overall complications 67 vs. 45 %, p = 0.044; pulmonary complications 56 vs. 34 %, p = 0.049). The anastomotic insufficiency rates did not differ significantly (SCC 11%, EAC 15%, p = 0.69). Long-term survival of EAC and SCC patients was not affected by perioperative (overall/pulmonary) complications or by the occurrence of anastomotic insufficiency. Also, neoadjuvant treatment did not influence the incidence of complications or long-term survival.

Conclusions

This is the first time the patient population of a center experienced with esophageal cancer surgery was assessed for the occurrence of general and esophageal cancer surgery-specific perioperative complications. Our results indicated that these complications did not affect long-term survival of EAC and SCC patients. Our data support the hypothesis that neoadjuvant treatment might not affect the incidence of perioperative complications or long-term survival after treatment of these tumor subtypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Makowiec F, Baier P, Kulemann B et al (2013) Improved long-term survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: influence of epidemiologic shift and neoadjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1193–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Soest EM, Dieleman JP, Siersema PD et al (2005) Increasing incidence of Barrett’s oesophagus in the general population. Gut 54:1062–1066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider PM, Baldus SE, Metzger R et al (2005) Histomorphologic tumour regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification. Ann Surg 242:684–692

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP (2007) Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol 8:545–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Law S, Wong J (2007) The current management of esophageal cancer. Adv Surg 41:93–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schröder W, Bollschweiler E, Kossow C et al (2006) Preoperative risk analysis: a reliable predictor of postoperative outcome after transthoracic esophagectomy? Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I et al (2012) Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 19:99–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirai T, Yamashita Y, Mukaida H et al (1998) Poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients with postoperative complications. Surg Today 28:576–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ott K, Bader FG, Lordick F et al (2009) Surgical factors influence the outcome after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a consecutive series of 240 patients at an experienced center. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1017–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferri LE, Law S, Wong KH et al (2006) The influence of technical complications on postoperative outcome and survival after esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:557–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrott PW, Markar SR, Kuppusamy MK et al (2012) Accordion severity grading system: assessment of relationship between costs, length of hospital stay, and survival in patients with complications after esophagectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 215:331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ichikawa H, Miyata G, Miyazaki S et al (2012) Esophagectomy using a thoracoscopic approach with an open laparotomic or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal stage for esophageal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 315 patients. Ann Surg 257:873–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Urschel JD, Vasan H (2003) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 185:538–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fiorica F, Di Bona D, Schepis F et al (2004) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 53:925–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM, Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group et al (2007) Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hölscher AH, Bollschweiler E (2012) Choosing the best treatment for esophageal cancer: criteria for selecting the best multimodal therapy. Recent Results Cancer Res 196:169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schweigert M, Dubecz A, Stein HJ (2013) Oesophageal cancer: an overview. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:230–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, CROSS Group et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagheri R, RajabiMashhadi MT, Ghazvini K et al (2012) The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on airway colonization and postoperative respiratory complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 14:725–728

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vande Walle C, Ceelen WP, Boterberg T et al (2012) Anastomotic complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation are related to radiation dose to the gastric fundus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM (2002) Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 194:285–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM et al (2005) Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on long term survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:3–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D et al (2004) The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 198:42–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Imdahl A, Schöffel U, Ruf G (2004) Impact of neoadjuvant therapy of perioperative morbidity in patients with esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 187:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmes D, Brüwer M, Bader FG, German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group et al (2011) Diagnostic evaluation, surgical technique, and perioperative management after esophagectomy: consensus statement of the German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:857–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin RC 2nd, Brennan MF, Jaques DP (2002) Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 235:803–813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA et al (2004) Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1170–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sunpaweravong S, Ruangsin S, Laohawiriyakamol S et al (2012) Prediction of major postoperative complications and survival for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients. Asian J Surg 35:104–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. D’Annoville T, D’Journo XB, Trousse D et al (2012) Respiratory complications after oesophagectomy for cancer do not affect disease-free survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P et al (2012) Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 255:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H et al (2010) The “best operation” for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 89:2163–2167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wormuth JK, Heitmiller RF (2006) Esophageal conduit necrosis. Thorac Surg Clin 16:11–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Boer AG, Stalmeier PF, Sprangers MA et al (2002) Transhiatal vs extended transthoracic resection in oesophageal carcinoma: patients’ utilities and treatment preferences. Br J Cancer 86:851–857

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M et al (1997) A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg 174:320–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJ (2006) Extent of surgical resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 15:781–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Omloo JM, Law SY, Launois B et al (2009) Short- and long-term advantages of transhiatal and transthoracic oesophageal cancer resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:793–797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H et al (2013) Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 257:238–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bardini R, Asolati M, Ruol A et al (1994) Anastomosis. World J Surg 18:373–378. doi:10.1007/BF00316817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Beitler AL, Urschel JD (1998) Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses. Am J Surg 175:337–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Otto J et al (2012) Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study (abstract). World J Surg Oncol 10:159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kayani B, Jarral OA, Athanasiou T et al (2012) Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 14:821–827

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Aminian A, Panahi N, Mirsharifi R et al (2011) Predictors and outcome of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery. J Cancer Res Ther 7:448–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Siewert JR, Ott K (2007) Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease? Semin Radiat Oncol 17:38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Okamura H et al (2012) Risk factors for postoperative respiratory complications following esophageal cancer resection. Oncol Lett 3:907–912

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I et al (2004) Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1177–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC et al (1992) Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak—a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 49:163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Martin LW, Swisher SG, Hofstetter W et al (2005) Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality. Ann Surg 242:392–399

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhu SC, Shen WB, Liu ZK et al (2011) Dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced lung toxicity in esophageal carcinoma. Tumori 97:596–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ruol A, Rizzetto C, Castoro C et al (2010) Interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: does delayed surgery have an impact on outcome? Ann Surg 252:788–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Monjazeb AM, Blackstock AW (2013) The impact of multimodality therapy of distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas on treatment-related toxicity and complications. Semin Radiat Oncol 23:60–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lin FC, Durkin AE, Ferguson MK (2004) Induction therapy does not increase surgical morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1783–1789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Scarpa M, Saadeh LM, Fasolo A et al (2013) Health-related quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer: analysis at different steps of the treatment pathway. J Gastrointest Surg 17:421–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Farid SG, Aldouri A, Morris-Stiff G et al (2010) Correlation between postoperative infective complications and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg 251:91–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ito H, Are C, Gonen M et al (2008) Effect of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 247:994–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gomez D, Morris-Stiff G, Wyatt J et al (2008) Surgical technique and systemic inflammation influences long-term disease-free survival following hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis. J Surg Oncol 98:371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no potential or real conflicts of interest for any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten Lindner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindner, K., Fritz, M., Haane, C. et al. Postoperative Complications Do Not Affect Long-Term Outcome in Esophageal Cancer Patients. World J Surg 38, 2652–2661 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2590-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2590-3

Keywords

Navigation