Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relevance of Surgery after Embolization of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Hemorrhage

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gastrointestinal and abdominal bleeding can lead to life-threatening situations. Embolization is considered a feasible and safe treatment option. The relevance of surgery has thus diminished in the past. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of surgery in the management of patients after embolization.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of outcomes after transarterial embolization of acute abdominal and gastrointestinal hemorrhage between January 2009 and December 2012 at the Sisters of Charity Hospital, Linz. Patients were divided into three groups, as follows: upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), and abdominal hemorrhage.

Results

Fifty-four patients with 55 bleeding events were included. The bleeding source could be localized angiographically in 80 %, and the primary clinical success rate of embolization was 81.8 % (45/55 cases). Early recurrent bleeding (<30 days) occurred in 18.2 % (10/55) of the patients, and delayed recurrent hemorrhage (>30 days) developed in 3.6 % (2/55). The mean follow-up was 8.4 months, and data were available for 85.2 % (46/54) of the patients. Surgery after embolization was required in 20.4 % of these patients (11/54). Failure to localize the bleeding site was identified as predictive of recurrent bleeding (p = 0.009). More than one embolization effort increased the risk of complications (p = 0.02) and rebleeding (p = 0.07).

Conclusions

Surgery still has an important role after embolization in patients with gastrointestinal and abdominal hemorrhage. One of five patients required surgery in cases of early and delayed rebleeding or because of ischemic complications (2/55 both had ischemic damage of the gallbladder) and bleeding consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sam C, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB Sr et al (2004) Warfarin and aspirin use and the predictors of major bleeding complications in atrial fibrillation (the Framingham heart study). Am J Cardiol 94:947–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Higham J, Kang JYMA (2002) Recent trends in admission and mortality due to peptic ulcer in England. Increasing frequency of haemorrhage among older subjects. Gut 50:460–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Derry S, Loke JK (2000) Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis. BMJ 321:1183–1187

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Leerdam ME, Vreeburg EM, Rauws EA et al (2003) Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. Am J Gastroenetrol 98:1494–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blatchford O, Davidson LA, Murray WR et al (1997) Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in west of Scotland: case ascertainment study. BMJ 315(7107):510–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Leerdam ME (2008) Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22:209–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Longstreth GF (1997) Epidemiology and outcome of patients hospitalized with acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 92:419–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Fiore F, Lecleire S, Merle V et al (2005) Changes in characteristics and outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a comparison of epidemiology and practices between 1996 and 2000 in a multicenter French study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:641–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker TG, Salazar GM, Waltman AC (2012) Angiographic evaluation and management of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage. World J Gastroenterol 18:1191–1201

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirsadraee S, Tirukonda P, Nicholson A et al (2011) Embolization for non variceal upper gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage: a systematic review. Clin Radiol 66:500–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulut OB, Rasmussen C, Fischer A (1996) Acute surgical treatment of complicated peptic ulcers with special reference to the elderly. World J Surg 20:574–577. doi:10.1007/s002689900089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermansson M, Stael von Holstein C, Zilling T (1997) Peptic ulcer perforation before and after the introduction of H2-receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:523–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Becker HD, Schriefers KH (1987) Operative treatment of gastric and duodenal hemorrhage. Surgery of the stomach. Indications, methods, complications. Springer, New York, pp 275–281

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farrell JJ, Friedmann LS (2005) The management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharamcol Ther 21:1281–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Foitzik T, Klar E (1996) Vaskuläre Notfälle des Darmes. In Winkeltau GJ, Lerch MM, (Hrsg) Gastroenterologische Notfalltherapie, Stuttgart, Wiss Verlag Ges, S, pp 239–247

  16. Jensen DM, Machiado GA, Juthaba R et al (2000) Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 342:78–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lhewa DY, Strate LL (2012) Pros and cons of colonoscopy in management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 18:1185–1190

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Geffroy Y, Rodallec MH, Boulay-Coletta I et al (2011) Multidetector CT angiography in acute gastrointestinal bleeding: why, when, and how. M Radiographics 31:E35–E46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnert J, Messmann H (2009) Diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:637–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boudghene F, L’Hermine C, Bigot JM (1993) Arterial complications of pancreatitis: diagnosis and therapeutic aspects in 104 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:551–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jaideep U, Barge MD, Jorge E et al (2012) Vascular complications of pancreatitis: role of interventional therapy. Korean J Radiol 13:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Knoefel WT, Hosch SB, Peiper M (2004) Chronic pancreatitis—from losing heart to acting smart! Eur J Med Res 9:563–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dousset B, Sauvanet A, Bardou M (1997) Selective surgical indications for iatrogenic hemobilia. Surgery 121:37–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pongchairerks P (1993) Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: accuracy, safety and sonographic findings. J Med Assoc Thai 76:597–600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rudich SM, Kinkhabwal MM, Murray NG (1998) Successful treatment of mycotic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms with arterial reconstruction and liposomal amphotericin B. Liver Transpl Surg 4:91–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yap FY, Omene BO, Patel MN (2013) Transcatheter embolotherapy for gastrointestinal bleeding: a single center review of safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes. Dis Sci 58:1976–1984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Loffroy R, Estivalet L, Cherblanc V et al (2012) Transcatheter embolotherapy for gastrointestinal bleeding: a single center review of safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes. World J Gastrointest Surg 4:223–227

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Loffroy R (2013) Transcatheter embolization as the new reference standard for endoscopically unmanageable upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Management of duodenal ulcer bleeding resistant to endoscopy: surgery is dead! World J Gastroenterol 19:1150–1151

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koh DC, Luchtefeld MA, Kim DG (2009) Efficacy of transarterial embolization as definitive treatment in lower gastrointestinal bleeding. BR Colorectal Dis 11:53–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bardou M, Benhaberou-Brun D, Le Ray I (2012) Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:97–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee L, Iqbal S, Najmeh S et al (2012) Mesenteric angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleed; predictors of active extravasation and outcomes. Can J Surg 55:382–388

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eriksson LG, Ljungdahl M, Sundbom M et al (2008) Transcatheter arterial embolization versus surgery in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy failure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1413–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Venclauskas L, Bratlie SO, Zachrisson K et al (2010) Is transcatheter arterial embolization a safer alternative than surgery when endoscopic therapy fails in bleeding duodenal ulcer? Scand J Gastroenterol 45:299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Defreyne L, Vanlangenhove P, De Vos M et al (2001) Embolization as a first approach with endoscopically unmanageable acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Radiology 218:739–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Funaki B, Kostelic JK, Lorenz J et al (2001) Superselective microcoil embolization of colonic hemorrhage. AJR 177:829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gillespie CJ, Sutherland AD, Mossop PJ et al (2010) Mesenteric embolization for lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1258–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tan KK, Wong D, Sim R (2008) Superselective embolization for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: an institutional review over 7 years. World J Surg 32:2707–2715. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9759-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lipof T, Sardella WV, Bartus CM et al (2008) The efficacy and durability of super-selective embolization in the treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Dis Colon Rectum 51:301–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kickuth R, Rattunde H, Gschossmann J et al (2008) Acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: minimally invasive management with microcatheter embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1289–1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Teng HC, Liang HL, Lin YH et al (2013) The efficacy and long-term outcome of microcoil embolotherapy for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Korean J Radiol 14:259–268

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahmed TM, Cowley JB, Robinson G et al (2010) Long term follow-up of transcatheter coil embolotherapy for major colonic haemorrhage. Colorectal Dis 12:1013–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Maleux G, Roeflaer F, Heye S et al (2009) Long-term outcome of transcatheter embolotherapy for acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2042–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yi WS, Vegeler R, Hoang K et al (2012) Watch and wait: conservative management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. J Surg Res 177:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Garcia-Osogobio S, Remes-Troche JM, Takahaschi T et al (2002) Surgical treatment of lower digestive tract hemorrhage. Rev Invest Clin 54:119–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Farner R, Lichliter W, Kuhn J et al (1999) Total colectomy versus limited colonic resection or acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Surg 178:587–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Renzulli P, Maurer CA, Netzer P et al (2002) Subtotal colectomy with primary ileorectostomy is effective for unlocalized diverticular hemorrhage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:67–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gernot Köhler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köhler, G., Koch, O.O., Antoniou, S.A. et al. Relevance of Surgery after Embolization of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Hemorrhage. World J Surg 38, 2258–2266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2570-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2570-7

Keywords

Navigation