Skip to main content

Ethical Issues in Surgical Innovation

Abstract

Innovation is responsible for most advances in the field of surgery. Innovative approaches to solving clinical problems have significantly decreased morbidity and mortality for many surgical procedures, and have led to improved patient outcomes. While innovation is motivated by the surgeon’s expectation that the new approach will be beneficial to patients, not all innovations are successful or result in improved patient care. The ethical dilemma of surgical innovation lies in the uncertainty of whether a particular innovation will prove to be a “good thing.” This uncertainty creates challenges for surgeons, patients, and the healthcare system. By its very nature, innovation introduces a potential risk to patient safety, a risk that may not be fully known, and it simultaneously fosters an optimism bias. These factors increase the complexity of informed consent and shared decision making for the surgeon and the patient. Innovative procedures and their associated technology raise issues of cost and resource distribution in the contemporary, financially conscious, healthcare environment. Surgeons and institutions must identify and address conflicts of interest created by the development and application of an innovation, always preserving the best interest of the patient above the academic or financial rewards of success. Potential strategies to address the challenges inherent in surgical innovation include collecting and reporting objective outcomes data, enhancing the informed consent process, and adhering to the principles of disclosure and professionalism. As surgeons, we must encourage creativity and innovation while maintaining our ethical awareness and responsibility to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Siegler M (1998) Ethical issues in innovative surgery: should we attempt a cadaveric hand transplantation in a human subject? Transplant Proc 30:2779–2782

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marron JM, Siegler M (2005) Ethical issues in innovative colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1109–1113

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McKernan JB (1999) Origin of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the USA: personal experience. World J Surg 23:332–333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernard HR, Hartman TW (1993) Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165:533–535

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hocking MP, Duerson MC, O’Leary JP et al (1983) Jejunoileal bypass for morbid obesity. Late follow-up in 100 cases. N Engl J Med 308:995–999

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith LP, Roy S (2008) Fire/burn risk with electrosurgical devices and endoscopy fiberoptic cables. Am J Otolaryngol 29:171–176

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Podnos YD, Williams RA (1997) Fires in the operating room. Reprinted from bulletin of the Am Coll Surg 82. Online http://www.facs.org/about/committees/cpc/oper0897.html. Accessed 11/25/13

  9. Johnson J, Rogers W (2012) Innovative surgery: the ethical challenges. J Med Ethics 38:9–12

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer PA, Siegler M, Whitington PF et al (1989) Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors. N Engl J Med 321:620–622

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Angelos P (2010) The ethical challenges of surgical innovation for patient care. Lancet 376:1046–1047

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frader JE, Caniano DA (1998) Research and innovation in surgery. In: McCullough LB, Jones JW, Brody BA (eds) Surgical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 217–241

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs — the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363:701–704

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Angelos P (2013) Ethics and surgical innovation: challenges to the professionalism of surgeons. Int J Surg 11:S1–S4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biffl WL, Spain DA, Reitsma AM et al (2008) Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the Society of University Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 206:1204–1209

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM et al (2009) Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 374:1097–1104

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan E. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, M.E., Siegler, M. & Angelos, P. Ethical Issues in Surgical Innovation. World J Surg 38, 1638–1643 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2568-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2568-1

Keywords

  • Patient Safety
  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
  • Ethical Dilemma
  • Laparoscopic Colectomy
  • Cochlear Implantation