Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of the Ponseti Method for Treatment of Clubfoot in Pakistan

World Journal of Surgery volume 38, pages 2217–2222 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Clubfoot is disabling, with an incidence of 0.9/1,000 live births to 7/1,000 live births. It affects mobility, productivity, and quality of life. Patients are treated surgically or non-surgically using the Ponseti method. We estimated the cost per patient treated with both methods and the cost-effectiveness of these methods in Pakistan.

Methods

Parents of patients treated, either surgically or with the Ponseti method, at the Indus Hospital’s free program for clubfoot were interviewed between February and May 2012. We measured the direct and indirect household expenditures for pre-diagnosis, incomplete treatment, and current treatment until the first brace for Ponseti method and the first corrective surgery for surgically treated patients. Hospital expenditure was measured by existing accounts.

Results

Average per-patient cost was $349 for the Ponseti method and $810 for patients treated surgically. Of these, the Indus hospital costs were $170 the for Ponseti method and $452 for surgically treated patients. The direct household expenditure was $154 and $314 for the Ponseti and surgical methods, respectively. The majority of the costs were incurred pre-diagnosis and after inadequate treatment, with the largest proportion spent on transportation, material, and fee for service. The Ponseti method is shown to be the dominant method of treatment, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,225.

Conclusions

The Ponseti method is clearly the treatment of choice in resource-constrained settings like Pakistan. Household costs for clubfoot treatment are substantial, even in programs offering free diagnostics and treatments and may be a barrier to service utilization for the poorest patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Beals RK (1978) Club foot in the Maori: a genetic study of 50 kindreds. N Z Med J 88:144–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mittal RL, Sekhon AS, Singh G et al (1993) The prevalence of congenital orthopaedic anomalies in a rural community. Int Orthop 17:11–12

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiels WE 2nd, Coley BD, Kean J et al (2007) Focused dynamic sonographic examination of the congenital clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 37:1118–1124

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO (2011) World report on disability. World Health Organization, Malta

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khan SA, Kumar A (2010) Ponseti’s manipulation in neglected clubfoot in children more than 7 years of age: a prospective evaluation of 25 feet with long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B 19:385–389

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ponseti IV (1992) Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg 74:448–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponseti IV (1998) Correction of the talar neck angle in congenital clubfoot with sequential manipulation and casting. Iowa Orthop J 18:74–75

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cosma D, Vasilescu D, Valeanu M (2007) Comparative results of the conservative treatment in clubfoot by two different protocols. J Pediatr Orthop B 16:317–321

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper DM, Dietz FR (1995) Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A 30-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg 77:1477–1489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jowett CR, Morcuende JA, Ramachandran M (2011) Management of congenital talipes equinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg 93:1160–1164

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gray K, Pacey V, Gibbons P et al (2012) Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD008602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morcuende JA, Egbert M, Ponseti IV (2003) The effect of the internet in the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot. Iowa Orthop J 23:83–86

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Staheli L, Morcuende JA, Pirani S, et al (2009) Clubfoot: Ponseti management. Global Help http://www.global-help.org/. Accessed 3 Dec 2013

  14. Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N (2002) Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 22:517–521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Radler C (2013) The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop 37:1747–1753

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Gelder JH, van Ruiten AG, Visser JD et al (2010) Long-term results of the posteromedial release in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 30:700–704

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Graf A, Hassani S, Krzak J et al (2010) Long-term outcome evaluation in young adults following clubfoot surgical release. J Pediatr Orthop 30:379–385

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Halanski MA, Huang JC, Walsh SJ et al (2009) Resource utilization in clubfoot management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1171–1179

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL (2006) Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg 88:986–996

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Richards BS, Faulks S, Rathjen KE et al (2008) A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method. J Bone Joint Surg 90:2313–2321

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreira LF, Nogueira MP, Pereira JC et al (2011) Comparison of hospital costs and duration of treatment with two different clubfoot protocols. Iowa Orthop J 31:49–51

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haft GF, Walker CG, Crawford HA (2007) Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. J Bone Joint Surg 89:487–493

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu N, Zhao L, Du Q et al (2010) From cutting to casting: impact and initial barriers to the Ponseti method of clubfoot treatment in China. Iowa Orthop J 30:1–6

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pirani S, Naddumba E, Mathias R et al (2009) Towards effective Ponseti clubfoot care: the uganda sustainable clubfoot care project. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1154–1163

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R et al (2003) Long-term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:1286–1294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verma A, Mehtani A, Sural S et al (2012) Management of idiopathic clubfoot in toddlers by Ponseti’s method. J Pediatr Orthop B 21:79–84

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burfat A, Mohammed S, Siddiqi O et al (2013) Understanding the knowledge and perceptions about clubfoot in Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative exploration. Iowa Orthop 33:149–152

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Finance Department of Indus Hospital for their contribution in articulating the expenditure incurred during treatment of patients enrolled in the study. This work was supported by the Amer Haider Charitable Foundation.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Interactive Research and Development (IRD), Suite 508, Shahrah-e-Faisal, Ibrahim Trade Towers, Karachi, Pakistan

    Hamidah Hussain

  2. Indus Hospital Research Center, 4th Floor, Indus Hospital, Korangi Crossing, Karachi, Pakistan

    Aziza Moiz Burfat, Lubna Samad & Fayez Jawed

  3. Department of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Indus Hospital, Korangi Crossing, Karachi, Pakistan

    Muhammad Amin Chinoy & Mansoor Ali Khan

Authors
  1. Hamidah Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aziza Moiz Burfat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lubna Samad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fayez Jawed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Amin Chinoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mansoor Ali Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidah Hussain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussain, H., Burfat, A.M., Samad, L. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of the Ponseti Method for Treatment of Clubfoot in Pakistan. World J Surg 38, 2217–2222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2530-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2530-2

Keywords

  • Clubfoot
  • Disability Weight
  • Ponseti Method
  • Incomplete Treatment
  • Serial Casting