Skip to main content

Efficacy and Predictor of Octreotide Treatment for Postoperative Chylothorax After Thoracic Esophagectomy

World Journal of Surgery volume 38, pages 2039–2045 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Postoperative chylothorax sometimes follows thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The effectiveness of octreotide treatment for it and factors that predict its response are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of octreotide for treating postoperative chylothorax following thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and factors that might predict successful treatment and allow chest drain removal.

Methods

We assessed 521 consecutive patients who underwent thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer to investigate the efficacy of octreotide for postoperative chylothorax. Among those with postoperative chylothorax, one group (group A) underwent conservative management, and the other (group B) was treated conservatively with added octreotide administration. We evaluated the clinical outcomes after octreotide administration and assessed the factors associated with successful treatment.

Results

Among the 521 patients, 20 (3.8 %) developed postoperative chylothorax: five in group A and 15 in group B. Two of the five (20 %) group A patients and 13 of the 15 (86.6 %) group B patients were treated successfully (p = 0.03). Factors significantly associated with treatment failure were (1) chest drain output of >1,000 ml/day before treatment (p = 0.04); (2) no reduction in chest drainage by the second day of treatment (p = 0.016); (3) chest drainage of >1,000 ml/day through the second day of treatment (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

For patients with esophageal cancer who undergo thoracic esophagectomy, octreotide can be an effective treatment for postoperative chylothorax.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D et al (2004) The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 198:42–50

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolger C, Walsh TN, Tanner WA et al (1991) Chylothorax after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 78:587–588

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexiou C, Watson M, Beggs D et al (1998) Chylothorax following oesophagogastrectomy for malignant disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14:460–466

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dugue L, Sauvanet A, Farges O et al (1998) Output of chyle as an indicator of treatment for chylothorax complicating oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 85:1147–1149

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dougenis D, Walker WS, Cameron EW et al (1992) Management of chylothorax complicating extensive esophageal resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:501–506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (2001) Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease. World J Surg 25:196–203. doi:10.1007/s002680020019

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H et al (2005) Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 189:98–109

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubin PJ, King IN, Gallagher PG (2000) Congenital chylothorax. Curr Opin Pediatr 12:505–509

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beghetti M, La Scala G, Belli D et al (2000) Etiology and management of pediatric chylothorax. J Pediatr 136:653–658

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wasmuth-Pietzuch A, Hansmann M, Bartmann P et al (2004) Congenital chylothorax: lymphopenia and high risk of neonatal infections. Acta Paediatr 93:220–224

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cerfolio R (2006) Chylothorax after esophagogastrectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 4:9–52

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nair SK, Petko M, Hayward MP (2007) Aetiology and management of chylothorax in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32:362–369

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rimensberger PC, Muller-Schenker B, Kalangos A et al (1998) Treatment of a persistent postoperative chylothorax with somatostatin. Ann Thorac Surg 66:253–254

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung Y, Leung MP, Yip M (2001) Octreotide for treatment of postoperative chylothorax. J Pediatr 139:157–159

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujita T, Daiko H, Nishimura M (2012) Early enteral nutrition reduces the rate of life-threatening complications after thoracic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. J Surg Res 48:79–84

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Merigliano S, Molena D, Ruol A et al (2000) Chylothorax complicating esophagectomy for cancer: a plea for early thoracic duct ligation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:453–457

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rindani R, Martin CJ, Cox MR (1999) Transhiatal versus Ivor–Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference? Aust N Z J Surg 69:187–194

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenberg MJ, Weisse CW (2005) Spontaneous resolution of iatrogenic chylothorax in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 226:1667–1670

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt A (1955) Chylothorax: review of 5 years’ cases in the literature and report of a case. Acta Chir Scand 118:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Engevik L (1972) Traumatic chylothorax. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:77–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Steiger Z, Weinberg M, Fell EH (1960) Postoperative chylothorax. Am J Surg 100:8–11

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ziedalski TM, Raffin TA, Sze DY et al (2004) Chylothorax after heart lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transpl 23:627–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lamberts SW, van der Lely AJ, de Herder WW et al (1996) Octreotide. N Engl J Med 334:246–254

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Markham KM, Glover JL, Welsh RJ et al (2000) Octreotide in the treatment of thoracic duct injuries. Am Surg 66:1165–1167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelly RF, Shumway SJ (2000) Conservative management of postoperative chylothorax using somatostatin. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1944–1945

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology for their critical discussion of this study. We also thank the members of the Division of Clinical Radiology for providing us with information about the imaging examinations.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-0882, Japan

    Takeo Fujita & Hiroyuki Daiko

Authors
  1. Takeo Fujita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroyuki Daiko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeo Fujita.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 79 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujita, T., Daiko, H. Efficacy and Predictor of Octreotide Treatment for Postoperative Chylothorax After Thoracic Esophagectomy. World J Surg 38, 2039–2045 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2501-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2501-7

Keywords

  • Esophageal Cancer
  • Octreotide
  • Thoracic Duct
  • Chest Drainage Tube
  • Transhiatal Esophagectomy