Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Intraoperative Distractions on Patient Safety: A Prospective Descriptive Study Using Validated Instruments

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is emerging evidence indicating that distractions in the operating room (OR) are prevalent. Studies have shown a negative impact of distractions, but they have been conducted mostly with residents in simulated environments. We tested the hypothesis that intraoperative distractions are associated with deterioration in patient safety checks in the OR.

Methods

We assessed 24 elective urologic procedures. Blinded trained assessors (two surgeons, one psychologist) used validated instruments to prospectively assess in vivo frequency and severity of distractions (related to communication, phones/pagers, equipment/provisions, OR environment, other hospital departments, or a member of the OR team) and completion of safety-related tasks (related to the patient, equipment, and communication). Descriptive and correlational analyses were conducted.

Results

Mean case duration was 70 min (mean intraoperative time 31 min). A mean of 4.0 communication distractions (range 0–9) and 2.48 other distractions (range 0–5) were recorded per case (distraction rate of one per 10 min). Distractions from external visitors (addressed to the entire team or the surgeon) and distractions due to lack of coordination between hospital departments were most disruptive. Regarding safety checks, patient tasks were completed most often (85–100 %) followed by equipment tasks (75–100 %) and communication tasks (55–90 %). Correlational analyses showed that more frequent/severe communication distractions were linked to lower completion of patient checks intraoperatively (median rho –0.56, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Distractions are prevalent in ORs and in this study were linked to deterioration in intraoperative patient safety checks. Surgeons should be mindful of their tolerance to distractions. Surgical leadership can help control distractions and reduce their potential impact on patient safety and performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weigl M, Müller A, Vincent C et al (2012) The association of workflow interruptions and hospital doctors’ workload: a prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 21:399–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weigl M, Müller A, Zupanc A et al (2009) Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians. BMC Health Serv Res 29:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT (2010) Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care 19:304–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grundgeiger T, Sanderson P (2009) Interruptions in healthcare: theoretical views. Int J Med Inform 78:293–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sevdalis N, Forrest D, Undre S et al (2008) Annoyances, disruptions, and interruptions in surgery: the disruptions in surgery index (DiSI). World J Surg 32:1643–1650. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9624-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent C (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) Distracting communications in the operating theatre. J Eval Clin Pract 13:390–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Primus CP, Healey AN, Undre S (2007) Distraction in the urology operating theatre. BJU Int 99:493–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Healey AN, Primus CP, Koutantji M (2007) Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 16:135–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng B, Martinec DV, Cassera MA et al (2008) A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 22:2171–2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiegmann DA, El Bardissi AW, Dearani JA et al (2007) Disruptions in surgical workflow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 142:658–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodell KH, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2006) Effects of cognitive distraction on performance on laparoscopic tasks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:94–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu KE, Man FY, Gizicki RA et al (2008) Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distractions on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:196–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feuerbacher RL, Funk KH, Spight DH et al (2012) Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons. Arch Surg 147:1026–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miscovic D, Rosenthal R, Zingg U et al (2008) Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of music on the virtual reality laparoscopic learning performance of novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:2416–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci 7:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Undre S, Healey AN, Darzi A et al (2006) Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study. World J Surg 30:1774–1783. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-0488-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Russ S, Arora S, Wharton R et al (2013) Measuring safety and efficiency in the operating room: development and validation of a metric for evaluating task execution in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216:472–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata S (2009) Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Aggarwal R et al (2010) Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 24:2588–2593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D et al (2010) The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147:318–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. CORESS (2013) A confidential reporting system for surgery. Available at: http://www.coress.org.uk

  23. Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212:234–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N et al (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35:1961–1969. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The National Institute for Health Research funded this research via the Imperial Center for Patient Safety and Service Quality (www.cpssq.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Sevdalis.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Distractions rating scale [6, 7]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sevdalis, N., Undre, S., McDermott, J. et al. Impact of Intraoperative Distractions on Patient Safety: A Prospective Descriptive Study Using Validated Instruments. World J Surg 38, 751–758 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2315-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2315-z

Keywords

Navigation