Abstract
Background
Rectourinary fistula (RUF) is an uncommon but devastating condition in men. It usually occurs as a complication of prostatic cancer treatment, whether this is by radiation therapy or surgery. It can also occur in patients with benign pathology of the prostate, inflammatory bowel disease, or Fournier’s gangrene, and following pelvic trauma. RUF represents a challenge for the surgeon because spontaneous closure is a rare event. Several techniques have been described for surgical repair of fistula. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate that the York Mason posterior, transrectal correction of an iatrogenic RUF is a reliable approach that offers good postoperative outcomes.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 39 patients who underwent York Mason repair from 1998 to 2012 at the University of Southern California (USC) and Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome (UCBM). The most frequent common causes of RUF were itemized, and statistical analysis was performed to determine correlations between the fistula’s etiology and surgical outcome. Patients were then divided into two different cohorts: those who had undergone only one previous procedure (group 1) and those who had undergone two or more surgeries (group 2). We performed a statistical analysis between the two groups and calculated the percentage of fistula repair by means of the posterior trans-sphincteric approach with the York Mason technique in each groups We evaluated the presence of comorbidities (diabetes and infection) and their influence on the surgical outcome. Finally, we reported patient outcomes during follow-up.
Results
In the present series, the RUF was iatrogenic in every case. The onset of the fistula followed prostate cancer treatment, most commonly after laparoscopic procedures. The success rate of fistula repair was found to be independent of the fistula’s etiology. Diabetes and infections did not influence the surgical outcome. Overall, more than 50 % of patients treated with the York Mason posterior, transanal, transrectal approach remained free of fistula during follow-up. Almost 90 % of those who were previously operated only once remained free of fistula.
Conclusions
The posterior trans-sphincteric approach of the York Mason technique is effective in treating RUF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harpster LE, Rommel FM, Sieber PR et al (1995) The incidence and management of rectal injury associated with radical prostatectomy in a community based urology practice. J Urol 154:1435–1438
Shin P, Foley E, Steers W (2000) Surgical management of rectourinary fistulae. J Am Coll Surg 191:547–553
Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R, Flamand V et al (2010) Surgery Illustrated—Surgical Atlas The York Mason operation. BJU Int 106:436–447
Bukowski TP, Charabarty A, Powell IJ, Frontera R, Perlmutter AD, Montie JE (1995) Acquired rectourethral fistula: methods of repair. J Urol 153:730–733
Stephenson RA, Middleton RG (1996) Repair of rectourinary fistula using a posterior sagittal transanal transrectal (modified York-Mason) approach: an update. J Urol 155:1989–1991
Hanus T (2002) Rectourethral fistulas. Int Braz J Urol 28:338–345
Kitamura H, Tsukamoto T (2011) Rectourinary fistula after radical prostatectomy: review of the literature for incidence, etiology, and management. Prostate Cancer 2011:629105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/629105. Accessed 17 Aug 2013
Goodwin WE, Turner RD, Winter CC (1958) Rectourinary fistula: principles of management and a technique of surgical closure. J Urol 80:246–254
Kuss R, Chatelain C, Jardin A, Gorin JP (1971) Les fistules entero-urinaires. J Urol Nephrol (Paris). 77(Suppl):467–470
Crippa A, Dall’Oglio MF, Nesrallah LJ, Hasegawa E, Antunes AA, Srougi M (2007) The York-Mason technique for rectourethral fistulas. Clinics 62(6):699–704
Hechenbleikner EM, Buckley JC, Wick EC (2013) Acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults: a systematic review of surgical repair techniques and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 56:374–383
Onaitis M, Ludwig K, Perez-Tamayo A et al (2006) The Kraske procedure: a critical analysis of a surgical approach for midrectal lesions. J Surg Oncol 94:194–202
Kilpatrick FR, Thompson HR (1962) Postoperative rectoprostatic fistula and closure by Kraske’s approach. Br J Urol 34:470–474
Wilbert DM, Buess G, Bichler KH (1996) Combined endoscopic closure of rectourethral fistula. J Urol 155:256–258
Fengler SA, Abcarian H (1997) The York Mason approach to repair of iatrogenic rectourinary fistulae. Am J Surg 173:213–217
Boushey RP, McLeod RS, Cohen Z (1998) Surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistula, emphasizing the posterior approach. Can J Surg 41:241–244
Renschler TD, Middleton RG (2003) 30 years of experience with York Mason repair of recto-urinary fistulas. J Urol 170:1222–1225
Dal Moro F, Mancini M, Pinto F, Zanovello N, Bassi PF, Pagano F (2006) Successful repair of iatrogenic rectourinary fistulas using the posterior sagittal tranrectal approach (York Mason): 15 year experience. World J Surg 30:107–113. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-7940-8
Wood TW, Middleton RG (1990) Single-stage transrectal transsphincteric (modified York Mason) repair of rectourinary fistulas. Urology 35:27–30
Hadley DA, Southwick A, Middleton RG (2012) York Mason procedure for repair of recto-urinary fistulae: a 40-year experience. BJU Int 109:1095–1098
Kasraeian A, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Galiano M, Vallancien G (2009) Modified York Mason technique for repair of iatrogenic rectourinary fistula: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 181:1178–1183
Vidal J, Reig C (1995) Fístulas urodigestivas: diagnóstico y tratamiento de 76 casos. Arch Esp Urol 48:241–246
Pera M et al (2008) Treatment of a rectourethral fistula after radical prostatectomy by York Mason posterior trans-sphincter exposure. Cir Esp 84:323–327 in Spanish]
Voelzke BB, McAninch JW, Breyer BN, Glass AS, Julio G-A (2013) Transperineal management for postoperative and radiation rectourethral fistulas. J Urol 189:966–971
Vanni AJ, Buckley JC, Zinman LN (2010) Management of surgical and radiation induced rectourethral fistulas with an interposition muscle flap and selective buccal mucosal onlay graft. J Urol 184:2400–2404
Zmora O, Potenti FM, Wexner SD et al (2003) Gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula. Ann Surg 237:483
Gupta G, Kumar S, Kekre NS et al (2008) Surgical management of rectourethral fistula. Urology 71:267
Ulrich D, Roos J, Jakse G, Pallua N (2009) Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of recto-urethral and rectovaginal fistulas: a retrospective analysis of 35 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:352–356
Dal Moro F, Secco S, Valotto C, Mancini M, Beltrami P, Zattoni F (2012) Twenty-year experience with surgical management of recto-urinary fistulas by posterior sagittal transrectal approach (York Mason). J Urol 188:470–471
Ghoniem G, Elmissiry M, Weiss E, Langford C, Abdelwahab H, Wexner S (2008) Transperineal repair of complex rectourethral fistula using gracilis muscle flap interposition: can urinary and bowel functions be preserved? J Urol 179:1882–1886
Spahn M, Vergho D, Riedmiller H (2009) Iatrogenic rectourethral fistula: perineal repair and buccal mucosa interposition. Br J Urol Int 103:242–246
Bochove-Overgaauw DM, Beerlage HP, Bosscha K, Gelderman WAH (2006) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for correction of rectourethral fistulae. J Endourol 20:1087–1090
Noldus J, Fernandez S, Huland H (1999) Rectourinary fistula repair using the Latzko technique. J Urol 161:1518–1520
Youssef AH, Fath-Alla M, El-Kassaby AW (1999) Perineal subcutaneous dartos pedicled flap as a new technique for repairing urethrorectal fistula. J Urol 161:1498–1500
Chirica M, Parc Y, Tiret E, Dehni N, McNamara D, Parc R (2006) Coloanal sleeve anastomosis (Soave procedure): the ultimate treatment option for complex rectourinary fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1379–1383
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falavolti, C., Sergi, F., Shehu, E. et al. York Mason Procedure to Repair Iatrogenic Rectourinary Fistula: Our Experience. World J Surg 37, 2950–2955 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2199-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2199-y