Skip to main content

Outcomes of Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leaks Found on Routine Postoperative Water-soluble Enema following Anterior Resection for Cancer

World Journal of Surgery volume 37, pages 2700–2704 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The incidence and consequence of an anastomotic leak associated with low anterior resection for cancer mandates covering stoma in most cases. A water-soluble enema is often performed to assess anastomotic integrity prior to stoma reversal. The functional outcome following reversal in patients with occult radiologically detected leaks is poorly defined. The goal of the present study was to determine the functional outcome in patients with a radiologically detected anastomotic leak who subsequently underwent stoma reversal.

Methods

This case control study used patients with and without radiologically detected occult anastomotic leak having undergone reversal of covering stomata. The study group was matched with controls for age, gender, procedure, tumor stage, and adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy. Validated fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL), Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFIS), and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Bowel Function Index (BFI) were used. Patient satisfaction, medication use, and ancillary procedures prior to closure were also recorded.

Results

Thirteen patients with radiologically detected occult anastomotic leaks and 13 matched controls were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The FIQL, CCFIS, and MSKCC BFI scores were significantly reduced in those with occult leaks. The mean number of radiological and surgical interventions was significantly greater in the patients with occult leaks. Antidiarrheal and bulking agent use, as well as patient satisfaction, were the same for both groups. Only one patient in the occult leak group would not undergo stoma reversal again.

Conclusions

Reversal of a defunctioning ileostomy in the presence of an occult radiological leak can be associated with poorer functional outcomes, but patient satisfaction is undiminished.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Lee WS, Yun SH, Roh YN, Yun HR, Lee WY, Cho YB, Chun HK (2008) Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World J Surg 32:1124–1129. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9451-2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, Matthiessen P (2011) Does a defunctioning stoma affect anorectal function after low rectal resection? Results of a randomized multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:747–752

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matthiessen P, Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, Rectal Cancer Trial on Defunctioning Stoma Study Group (2010) Symptomatic anastomotic leakage diagnosed after hospital discharge following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 12(7 Online):e82–e87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2010) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 12(7 Online):e76–e81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan AA, Wheeler JM, Cunningham C, George B, Kettlewell M, Mortensen NJ (2008) The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:587–592

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Merkel S, Hohenberger W, Matzel KE (2003) Does anastomotic leakage affect functional outcome after rectal resection for cancer? Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:406–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Gorgun E, Zutshi M, Church JM, Lavery IC, Hull TL (2005) Quality of life, functional outcome, and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 48:735–743

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Koperen PJ, van der Zaag ES, Omloo JM, Slors JF, Bemelman WA (2011) The persisting presacral sinus after anastomotic leakage following anterior resection or restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 13:26–29

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huh JW, Park YA, Sohn SK (2007) A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1040–1046

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, Gottesman L, Paty PB, Weiser MR, Guillem JG, Minsky BD, Kalman M, Thaler HT, Schrag D, Wong WD (2005) The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1353–1365

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coco C, Valentini V, Manno A, Rizzo G, Gambacorta MA, Mattana C, Verbo A, Picciocchi A (2007) Functional results after radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:903–910

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Graf W, Mellgren A, Matzel KE, Hull T, Johansson C, Bernstein M, NASHA Dx Study Group et al (2011) Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet 377(9770):997–1003

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Park IJ (2010) Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14(7):1190–1196

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NHS reference costs (2012–2011) http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consumdh/groups/35. Accessed 15 July 2012

  17. Ashburn JH, Stocchi L, Kiran RP, Dietz DW, Remzi FH (2013) Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy for cancer: effect on long-term function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 56:275–280

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, Nguyen V, Pigazzi A, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148:65–71

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, Lindmark G (2011) Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival? Colorectal Dis 13:272–283

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Riss S, Stift A, Meier M, Haiden E, Grünberger T, Bergmann M (2010) Endo-sponge assisted treatment of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12(7 Online):e104–e108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Koperen PJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, Bakker CM, Heres P, Slors JF, Bemelman WA (2009) The Dutch multicenter experience of the endo-sponge treatment for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23(6):1379–1383

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoon J, Lee HS, Hyun JJ, Kim CD, Ryu HS (2013) Endoscopic closure of postoperative anastomotic leakage with Endoclips and detachable snares. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(2):e74–e77

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Academic Surgical Unit, Castle Hill Hospital, University of Hull, Cottingham, HU16 5JQ, UK

    S. Killeen, P. Souroullas, H. Ho Tin, I. A. Hunter, H. O’Grady, J. Gunn & J. E. Hartley

Authors
  1. S. Killeen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Souroullas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Ho Tin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. A. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. O’Grady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Gunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. E. Hartley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Killeen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Killeen, S., Souroullas, P., Ho Tin, H. et al. Outcomes of Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leaks Found on Routine Postoperative Water-soluble Enema following Anterior Resection for Cancer. World J Surg 37, 2700–2704 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2193-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2193-4

Keywords

  • Anastomotic Leak
  • Maintained Database
  • Stoma Reversal
  • Leak Group
  • Fecal Incontinence Quality