Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Extended Lymphadenectomy in Colon Cancer is Crucial

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No one doubts that lymph node dissection in colon cancer is necessary, it is just the extent of that dissection that is still under debate. As the individual steps of an oncologic operation cannot be separated from each other, analysis of the significance of lymph node dissection alone is difficult. It has been proven that the T category is directly related to the number and central spread of lymph node metastases. Micrometastases and isolated tumor cells may be detected in lymph nodes by using special staining techniques; their presence may worsen prognosis significantly and approximate it to UICC stage III. The numbers of dissected lymph nodes and the ratio of involved versus dissected lymph nodes have been used as markers for quality of surgery and histopathological evaluation. Recent results underscore the importance of technique and extent of dissection. Dissection must be performed along the embryologic planes of the mesocolon and leave them intact. A high vascular tie with preservation of the central hypogastric nerves must be applied in order to achieve the best oncologic results while preserving quality of life. Extended lymphadenectomy is oncologically relevant only when it is combined with removal of the primary tumor with adequate longitudinal clearance, an intact complete mesocolon, and high vascular tie. It is part of a concept in which the tumor-bearing specimen is harvested as an enveloped package to minimize the risk of tumor cell spillage and local recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K et al (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moynihan BG (1908) The surgical treatment of cancer of the sigmoid flexure and rectum with especial reference to the principles to be observed. Surg Gynecol Obstet 6:463

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubecz A, Solymosi N, Schweigert M et al (2013) Time trends and disparities in lymphadenectomy for gastrointestinal cancer in the United States: a population-based analysis of 326, 243 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 17(4):611–618 discussion 618-619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Croner RS, Merkel S, Papadopoulos T et al (2009) Multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1381–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heald RJ (1988) The ‘holy plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K et al (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF et al (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. West N (2010) Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer specimens: national standards are achievable, and low numbers are associated with reduced survival. Colorectal Dis 12:309–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. West NP, Morris EJ, Retime O et al (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS et al (1990) Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma. N Engl J Med 322:352–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Påhlman L, Glimelius B (1990) Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 211:187–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmiegel W, Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D et al (2008) Update S3-guideline “colorectal cancer” 2008. Z Gastroenterol 46:799–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hermanek P (2000) Lymph nodes and malignant tumors. Zentralbl Chir 125:790–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Quirke P, Morris EJ (2007) Reporting colorectal cancer. Histopathology 50:103–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan RN, Rafii S, Lyden D (2006) Preparing the “soil”: the premetastatic niche. Cancer Res 66(23):11089–11093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oppenheimer SB (2006) Cellular basis of cancer metastasis: a review of fundamentals and new advances. Acta Histochem 108(5):327–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Laubert T, Habermann JK, Hemmelmann C et al (2012) Metachronous metastasis- and survival-analysis show prognostic importance of lymphadenectomy for colon carcinomas. BMC Gastroenterol 12:24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruch HP, Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH et al (1999) Actual standards and controversies on operative technique and lymph-node dissection in colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:167–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hermanek P, Mansmann U, Staimmer D et al (2000) The German experience. The surgeon as a prognostic factor in colon and rectl cancer surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 9:33–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hermanek P, Wiebelt H, Staimmer D et al (1995) Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma—experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group colo-rectal carcinoma. Tumori 81(3 Suppl):60–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kessler H, Hermanek P (1998) Outcomes in rectal cancer surgery are directly related to technical factors. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 9:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kessler H, Mansmann U, Hermanek P Jr, Riedl S, Staimmer D, Hermanek P for the Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma (SGCRC) (1998) Semin Colon Rectal Surg 9(4):233–240

    Google Scholar 

  26. West NP, Sutton KM, Ingeholm P et al (2010) Improving the quality of colon cancer surgery through a surgical education program. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1594–1603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kube R, Ptok H, Wolff S et al (2009) Quality of medical care in colorectal cancer in Germany. Onkologie 32:25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Haboubi N (2009) Colonic surgery for cancer: a new paradigm. Colorectal Dis 11:333–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM et al (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:433–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenberg R, Engel J, Bruns C et al (2010) The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in a population-based collective of colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 251:1070–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsai HL, Lu CH, Hsieh JS et al (2007) The prognostic significance of total lymph node harvest in patients with T2–4N0M0 colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11:660–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chok KS, Law WL (2007) Prognostic factors affecting survival and recurrence of patients with pT1 and pT2 colorectal cancer. World J Surg 31:1485–1490. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9089-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen SL, Bilchik AJ (2006) More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I–III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 244:602–610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R et al (2006) Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3570–3575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K et al (2012) Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42(1):29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sjo OH, Merok MA, Svindland A et al (2012) Prognostic impact of lymph node harvest and lymph node ratio in patients with colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:307–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Ueno H et al (2010) Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes examined in colon cancer surgery: clinical application beyond simple measurement. Ann Surg 251:872–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Peschaud F, Benoist S, Julié C et al (2008) The ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes is a powerful independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 248:1067–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ceelen W, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P (2010) Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2847–2855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Edler D, Ohrling K, Hallström M et al (2007) The number of analyzed lymph nodes–a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol 46:975–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Storli K, Lindboe CF, Kristoffersen C et al (2010) Lymph node harvest in colon cancer specimens depends on tumour factors, patients and doctors, but foremost on specimen handling. APMIS 119:127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Færden AE, Sjo OH, Bukholm IR et al (2011) Lymph node micrometastases and isolated tumor cells influence survival in stage I and II colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Merrie AEH, Phillips LV, Yun K et al (2001) Skip metastases in colon cancer: assessment by lymph node mapping using molecular detection. Surgery 129:684–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Söndenaa K, West N, Sugihara K et al (2013) The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a high (apical) vascular tie for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic access surgery (submitted)

  46. Morris EJA, Maughan NJ, Forman D et al (2007) Who to treat with adjuvant therapy in Dukes B/stage II colorectal cancer? The need for high quality pathology. Gut 56:1419–1425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma (2nd english edn). Kanehara & Co, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kobayashi H, Ueno H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2006) Distribution of lymph node metastasis is a prognostic index in patients with stage III colon cancer. Surgery 139:516–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hogan NM, Winter DC (2013) A nodal positivity constant: new perspectives in lymph node evaluation and colorectal cancer. World J Surg 37(4):878–882. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1891-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hida J, Okuno K, Yasutomi M et al (2005) Number versus distribution in classifying regional lymph node metastases from colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg 201:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Toyota S, Ohta H, Anazawa S (1995) Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:705–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Goligher JC (1984) Incidence and pathology of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. In: Goligher JC (ed) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5. Aufl. Balliére Tindall, London, p 445

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jinnai D (1983) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Jpn J Surg 13:557–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tan KY, Kawamura YJ, Mizokami K et al (2010) Distribution of the first metastatic lymph node in colon cancer and its clinical significance. Colorectal Dis 12:44–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Ueno H et al (2011) Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg 98:1171–1178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ovebro K, Rokke O (2010) Extended lymph node dissection in colorectal cancer surgery. Reliability and reproducibility in assessments of operative reports. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Robinson CN, Chen GJ, Balentine CJ et al (2011) Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1412–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Turnbull RB Jr (1975) Current concepts in cancer. Cancer of the GI tract: colon, rectum, anus. The no-touch isolation technique of resection. JAMA 231:1181–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Spasojevic M, Stimec BV, Gronvold LB et al (2011) The anatomical and surgical consequences of right colectomy for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1503–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bernhoff R, Holm T, Sjövall A et al (2012) Increased lymph node harvest in patients operated on for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis 14:691–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Park IJ, Choi GS, Kang BM et al (2009) Lymph node metastasis patterns in right-sided colon cancers: is segmental resection of these tumors oncologically safe? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1501–1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Quirke P (2008) Prospective assessment of the quality of surgery in the MRC CLASICC trial evidence for variation in the plane of surgery in colon cancer, local recurrence and survival. www.ncri.org.uk/ncriconference/2008abstracts/abstracts/B115.htm. Accessed 20 Sept 2011

  63. Yada H, Sawai K, Taniguchi H et al (1997) Analysis of vascular anatomy and lymph node metastases warrants radical segmental bowel resection for colon cancer. World J Surg 21:109–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Maingot R (1974) Abdominal operations. Cop, New York

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hohenberger W, Lux P, Merkel S et al (2011) Lymph node dissection for carcinomas of the lower gastrointestinal tract. What is evidence-based? Chirurg 82:1096–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kim JC, Lee KH, Yu CS et al (2004) The clinicopathological significance of inferior mesenteric lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:271–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Lange MM, Buunen M, van de Velde CJ et al (2008) Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1139–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS (2008) High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Dig Surg 25:148–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. West NP, Hohenberger W, Finan PJ et al (2009) Mesocolic plane surgery: an old but forgotten technique? Colorectal Dis 11:988–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Bertelsen CA, Bols B, Ingeholm P et al (2011) Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision? Colorectal Dis 13:1123–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Hogan AM, Winter DC (2009) Complete mesocolic excision—a marker of surgical quality? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1889–1891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Weber K, Merkel S, Perrakis A et al (2013) Is there a disadvantage to radical lymph node dissection in colon cancer? Int J Colorectal Dis 28(2):217–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT et al (1998) For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 83:666–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Ratto C, Sofo L, Ippoliti M et al (1999) Accurate lymph-node detection in colorectal specimens resected for cancer is of prognostic significance. Dis Colon Rectum 42:143–154 discussion 154-158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Cianchi F, Palomba A, Boddi V et al (2002) Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined. World J Surg 26:384–389. doi:10.1007/s00268-001-0236-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wong JH, Bowles BJ, Bueno R et al (2002) Impact of the number of negative nodes on disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1341–1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A et al (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Law CH, Wright FC, Rapanos T et al (2003) Impact of lymph node retrieval and pathological ultra-staging on the prognosis of stage II colon cancer. J Surg Oncol 84:120–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Berberoglu U (2004) Prognostic significance of total lymph node number in patients with T1–4N0M0 colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1689–1693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Yoshimatsu K, Ishibashi K, Umehara A et al (2005) How many lymph nodes should be examined in Dukes’ B colorectal cancer? Determination on the basis of cumulative survival rate. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1703–1706

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gumus M, Yumuk PF, Atalay G et al (2005) What is the optimal number of lymph nodes to be dissected in colorectal cancer surgery? Tumori 91:168–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sarli L, Bader G, Iusco D et al (2005) Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:272–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Mammen JM, James LE, Molloy M et al (2007) The relationship of lymph node dissection and colon cancer survival in the veterans affairs central cancer registry. Am J Surg 194:349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Tsikitis VL, Larson DL, Wolff BG et al (2009) Survival in stage III colon cancer is independent of the total number of lymph nodes retrieved. J Am Coll Surg 208:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Vather R, Sammour T, Kahokehr A et al (2009) Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in stage II and stage III colon cancer: a national study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:585–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    Werner Hohenberger

  2. Digestive Disease Institute, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. / A 30, 44195, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Hermann Kessler

Authors
  1. Hermann Kessler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Werner Hohenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Kessler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kessler, H., Hohenberger, W. Extended Lymphadenectomy in Colon Cancer is Crucial. World J Surg 37, 1789–1798 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2130-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2130-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation