Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Semi-mechanical versus Hand-sewn or Circular Stapled Esophagogastrostomy for Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture

  • Invited Commentary
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN et al (2013) A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg 37:1043–1050. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-1932-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schröder W, Hölscher AH, Bludau M et al (2010) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with and without laparoscopic conditioning of the gastric conduit. World J Surg 34:738–743. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0403-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TC et al (2011) End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 254:226–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L et al (1998) Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 65:814–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hölscher AH, Fetzner UK, Bludau M et al (2011) Complications and management of complications in oesophageal surgery. Zentralbl Chir 136:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM et al (1997) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 226:169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierie JP, de Graf PW, Poen H et al (1993) Incidence and management of benign anastomotic stricture after cervical esophagogastrostomy. Br J Surg 80:471–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P et al (2010) Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 251:1064–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu JF, Wang QZ, Ping YM et al (2008) Complications after esophagectomy for cancer: 53-year experience with 20,796 patients. World J Surg 32:395–400. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9349-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams VA, Watson TJ, Zhovtis S et al (2008) Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy. Surg Endosc 22:1470–1476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. K. Fetzner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fetzner, U.K., Hölscher, A.H. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Semi-mechanical versus Hand-sewn or Circular Stapled Esophagogastrostomy for Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture. World J Surg 37, 2246–2247 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2110-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2110-x

Keywords

Navigation