Abstract
Background
Frequent use of computed tomography (CT) in trauma patients results in frequent detection of non-trauma-related incidental findings (IFs). Inpatient documentation and disclosure at discharge are infrequent, even when they are potentially serious. We aimed to not only identify the incidence of IFs but also to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to trigger follow-up.
Methods
In this before–after study, all trauma patients evaluated by the trauma surgery service who underwent CT were admitted for >24 h, had at least one IF requiring follow-up, and had a primary care physician (PCP) employed in our health care system were identified. The historical control period was from January 2006 to December 2008. The intervention period was from December 2011 to September 2012. Intervention consisted of notifying the PCP via email or postal letter. The outcome of interest—the rate of follow-up—was compared between both groups.
Results
During the historical period, 364 (20.5 %) of 1,774 eligible trauma patients had 434 IFs requiring follow-up. During the study period, 197 (26 %) of 692 trauma patients had 212 IFs requiring follow-up. Overall, 91 % of study patients with postdischarge PCP follow-up had documented follow-up of the IF. There was a significant improvement in the rate of follow-up in the study group compared to that of the control group (51 vs. 11 %; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Detection of IFs is common in trauma patients. A dedicated effort of communicating the presence of an IF to the patient’s PCP triggered a follow-up for 91 % of patients who saw their PCP after hospital discharge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Huynh TT, Moran KR, Blackburn AH et al (2008) Optimal management strategy for incidental findings in trauma patients: an initiative for midlevel providers. J Trauma 65:331–334 discussion 335–336
Barrett TW, Schierling M, Zhou C et al (2009) Prevalence of incidental findings in trauma patients detected by computed tomography imaging. Am J Emerg Med 27:428–435
Barboza R, Fox JH, Shaffer LE et al (2009) Incidental findings in the cervical spine at CT for trauma evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:725–729
Messersmith WA, Brown DF, Barry MJ (2001) The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans. Am J Emerg Med 19:479–481
Paluska TR, Sise MJ, Sack DI et al (2007) Incidental CT findings in trauma patients: incidence and implications for care of the injured. J Trauma 62:157–161
Devine AS, Jackson CS, Lyons L et al (2010) Frequency of incidental findings on computed tomography of trauma patients. West J Emerg Med 11:24–27
Munk MD, Peitzman AB, Hostler DP et al (2010) Frequency and follow-up of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans: experience at a level one trauma center. J Emerg Med 38:346–350
Sperry JL, Massaro MS, Collage RD et al (2010) Incidental radiographic findings after injury: dedicated attention results in improved capture, documentation, and management. Surgery 148:618–624
Ekeh AP, Walusimbi M, Brigham E et al (2010) The prevalence of incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography scans of trauma patients. J Emerg Med 38:484–489
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Gloria Salazar, MD for her contribution to this project.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeh, D.D., Imam, A.M., Truong, S.H. et al. Incidental Findings in Trauma Patients: Dedicated Communication with the Primary Care Physician Ensures Adequate Follow-Up. World J Surg 37, 2081–2085 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2092-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2092-8