Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patients’ Preferences on Information and Involvement in Decision Making for Gastrointestinal Surgery

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The relationship between physicians and patients has undergone important changes, and the current emancipation of patients has led to a real partnership in medical decision making. The present study aimed to assess patients’ preferences on different aspects of decision making during treatment and potential complications, as well as the amount and type of preoperative information wanted before visceral surgery.

Methods

This was a prospective non-randomized study based on a questionnaire given to 253 consecutive patients scheduled for elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Results

In considering surgical complications or treatment in the intensive care unit, 64 % of patients wished to take an active role in any medical decisions. The respective figures for cardiac resuscitation and treatment limitations were 89 and 60 %. As for information, 73, 77, and 47 % of patients wish detailed information, information on a potential ICU hospitalization, and knowledge of cardiac resuscitation, respectively. Elderly and low-educated patients were significantly less interested in shared medical decision making (p = 0.003 and 0.015), and in receiving information (p = 0.03 and 0.05). Similarly, involvement of the family in decision making was significantly less important to elderly and male patients (p = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively). Neither the type of operation (minor or major) nor the severity of disease (malignancies versus non-malignancies) was a significant factor for shared decision making, information, or family involvement.

Conclusions

The vast majority of surgical patients clearly want to get adequate preoperative information about their disease and the planned treatment. They also consider it crucial to be involved in any kind of decision making for treatment and complications. For most patients, the family role is limited to supporting the treating physicians if the patient is unable to participate in decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I et al (2001) Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ 322:468–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mulley A (2009) Inconvenient truth about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practice. BMJ 339:b4073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards A, Elwyn G (2003) Shared decision-making. Achieving evidence-based patient choice. Patient Educ Couns 50:229–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hotta K, Kiura K, Takigawa N et al (2010) Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions. J Thorac Oncol 5:1668–1672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laine C, Davidoff F (1996) Patient-centered medicine: a professional evolution. JAMA 275:152–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvien J (1996) What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision-making? Arch Intern Med 156:1414–1420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart MA (1995) Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 152:1423–1433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mead N, Bower P (2002) Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 48:51–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazur DJ, Hickam DH, Mazur MD (2005) The role of doctor’s opinion in shared decision-making: what does shared decision-making really mean when considering invasive medical procedures? Health Expect 8:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connor A, Bennett C, Stacey D et al. (2009) Decision aids for people facing health treatment on screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001431

  11. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE (1988) Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 3:448–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE (1989) Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 27(supp l):110–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP et al (1989) Does choice of treatment affect psychological morbidity in early breast cancer? A three-year prospective study. Br J Surg 76:641

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S et al (1998) Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care from Diagnosis Research Team. BMJ 317:1202–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P et al (2000) Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract 50:892–899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Langewitz W, Nübling M, Weber H (2006) Hospital patients’ preferences for involvement in decision-making. A questionnaire survey of 1040 patients from a Swiss university hospital. Swiss Med Wkly 136:59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL (2004) Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. BJU Int 93:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beaver K, Booth K (2007) Information needs and decision-making preferences: comparing findings for gynaecological, breast and colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 11:409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bilodeau BA, Degner LF (1996) Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 23:691–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D et al (1997) Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277:1485–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL et al (2002) Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer 94:2076–2080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davison BJ, Breckon E (2012) Factors influencing treatment decision making and information preferences of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Patient Educ Couns 87:369–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsuyama RK, Wilson-Genderson M, Kuhn L et al (2011) Education level, not health literacy, associated with information needs for patients with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 85:e229–e236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davidson JR, Brundage MD, Feldman-Stewart D (1999) Lung cancer treatment decisions: patients’ desires for participation and information. Psychooncology 8:511–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Friis LS, Elverdam B, Schmidt KG (2003) The patient’s perspective: a qualitative study of acute myeloid leukaemia patients’ need for information and their information-seeking behavior. Support Care Cancer 11:162–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlsson ME, Strang PM (1998) How patients with gynecological cancer experience the information process. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 19:192–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mills ME, Sullivan K (2000) Patients with operable oesophageal cancer: their experience of information-giving in a regional thoracic unit. J Clin Nurs 9:236–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sahay TB, Gray RE, Fitch M (2000) A qualitative study of patient perspectives on colorectal cancer. Cancer Pract 8:38–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mallardi V (2005) The origin of informed consent. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 25:312–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Salako SE (2011) Informed consent under the European Convention on Biomedicine and the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics. Med Law 30:101–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sahin N, Oztörk A, Ozkan Y et al (2010) What do patients recall from informed consent given before orthopedic surgery? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44:469–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghulam AT, Kessler M, Bachmann LM et al (2006) Patients’ satisfaction with the preoperative informed consent procedure: a multicenter questionnaire survey in Switzerland. Mayo Clin Proc 81:307–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kušec S, Orešković S, Škegro M et al (2006) Improving comprehension of informed consent. Patient Educ Couns 60:294–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson A, Sandford J, Tyndall J (2003) Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD003716

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gangol R, Maharjan D (2010) Information leaflet as an adjunct to verbal counseling in obtaining informed consent. J Nepal Med Assoc 49:117–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Felley C, Perneger TV, Goulet I et al (2008) Combined written and oral information prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with oral information alone: a randomized trial. BMC Gastroenterol 8:22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Astley CM, Chew DP, Aylward PE et al (2008) A randomised study of three different informational AIDS prior to coronary angiography, measuring patient recall, satisfaction and anxiety. Heart Lung Circ 17:25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hughes S (2002) The effects of giving patients pre-operative information. Nurs Stand 16:33–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Scott A (2004) Managing anxiety in ICU patients: the role of pre-operative information provision. Nurs Crit Care 9:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Puchalski CM, Zhong Z, Jacobs MM et al (2000) Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(5 Suppl):84–90

    Google Scholar 

  41. Albain KS, Green SR, Lichter AS et al (1996) Influence of patient characteristics, socioeconomic factors, geography, and systemic risk on the use of breast-spearing treatment in women enrolled in adjuvant breast cancer studies: an analysis of two intergroup trials. J Clin Oncol 14:3009–3017

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Emilie Uldry, Markus Schäfer, Alend Saadi & Nicolas Demartines

  2. Statistical Unit, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Valentin Rousson

Authors
  1. Emilie Uldry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alend Saadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valentin Rousson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicolas Demartines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilie Uldry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uldry, E., Schäfer, M., Saadi, A. et al. Patients’ Preferences on Information and Involvement in Decision Making for Gastrointestinal Surgery. World J Surg 37, 2162–2171 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2084-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2084-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation