Appendix: cases 1, 2, and 3
Case 1: vascular surgeon not attending first vascular repair of IVI
An 81-year-old man is undergoing reoperation due to residual rectal cancer. The preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a small aortoiliacal aneurysm. The sigmoid colon and ureters are adherent with ambient tissues. During the dissection there is a rift in the aneurysmatic left iliac artery. It is repaired with a continuous suture. There is no comment how hemostasis was achieved before and during suturing. There is no comment on pulses distal to the suture. After a lengthy operation, including Bricker deviation of the ureters, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Severe ischemia in the lower extremities develops during the night. Vascular surgeons are involved, and a bilateral aortoiliacal occlusion is diagnosed. At bilateral embolectomy from the groin the catheters cannot proceed more than 15 cm proximally into the aortoiliacal segment. An axillobifemoral bypass solves the inflow problem. At the end of the operation, after revascularization, the patient deteriorates and dies during the afternoon.
Comment: Failure to contact a specific competence for a specific iatrogenic injury is unacceptable. To achieve hemostasis and operate on an aneurysmatic vessel with thrombotic debris can be problematic. Completion control, including pulses in the groin after surgery, and continuous postoperative controls were not mentioned in the records. We did not have access to the nurse records of the ICU. Different record systems make analysis of adverse events difficult.
There was no autopsy. The cause of death written on the death certificate was aortoiliac thromboembolism, aortoiliac aneurysm (without rupture), and surgery for malignancy within 30 days. There was no code for iatrogenic injury.
Note: This would have been a missing case if only the database of diagnostic codes (ICD) had been scrutinized instead of a specialty register (Swedvasc).
Case 2: communication and reporting
A 33-year-old woman suffered from a lumbar disc hernia (L4-L5), with severe radiant pain and urinary retention. During the operation (dorsal approach) the blood pressure (BP) drops, but there is no visible bleeding. The BP is corrected with ephedrine injection. Poor urine production is partly corrected with mannitol infusion. At the end of the operation there is a change of anesthetist. Postoperatively, the patient has tachycardia and faints in the recovery room. Noninvasive BP is 110 mmHg. Initially, she is treated with an opioid inverse agonist and an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. After recovery she is given β-blockers for the tachycardia. Shortly thereafter the patient’s condition deteriorates with weak peripheral pulses, a nondetectable noninvasive BP, and hemoglobin 78 g/L. She is transferred to the ICU where a central venous line in placed, and she is given intravenous fluids. There is still no visible external bleeding. The abdomen expands with the infusions. The surgeon on call takes the patient to the operation theater. There is a massive retroperitoneal hematoma, and both the right common iliac vein and artery are damaged near the aortic bifurcation. Hemostasis is achieved with clamps on the caval and both iliac veins and the aorta and right iliac artery. The defect on the iliac artery is repaired with a patch, and the iliac vein is sutured because of the massive bleeding and unstable circulation. Asystole appears at the end of the operation with no recovery. The patient dies.
Comment: Even though there were signs and suspicion of bleeding perioperatively, any worry about this possibility seems to have been missed during the many handovers and reports. The development is rather typical but because of its rarity was not considered a possible cause of death. There was no autopsy.
Case 3: selection of method and technical failure
A 73-year-old woman undergoes coronary angiography because of a recent percutaneous coronary intervention. Her history includes extensive vascular surgery with aortobifemoral bypass and bilateral femoropopliteal bypasses (below-knee right side and above-knee left side). The first puncture in the right groin goes subintimally, but puncture of the left side gives access. A FemoStop is placed on the right groin. During compression for hemostasis the right foot develops severe ischemia with pain, paresthesia, and paralysis. A vascular surgeon is called. The symptoms deteriorate rapidly despite no compression, and the clinical signs demand acute operation. Perioperative findings reveal thromboembolic occlusions due to the invasive manipulation and external compression including the right aortobifemoral graft limb, the profunda artery, and the right femoropopliteal graft. After a long operation with thromboembolectomy and patches plus deteriorated cardiac function, the inflow and profunda artery outflow is satisfactory, but the runoff to the foot is poor. Perioperative angiography shows no good distal foot artery for bypass. Because of irreversible ischemia, amputation above the right knee is performed 4 days later. The patient is transferred to a rehabilitation ward but deteriorates progressively. She dies 29 days after the IVI.
There was no autopsy. The cause of death on the death certificate was general arteriosclerosis, cardiac failure, and unspecified complications after more surgery.
Comment: Contact a vascular surgeon before choosing the access site and initiating interventions in patients with severe arteriosclerosis and multiple reconstructions with vascular grafts. Chose a noninvasive investigation or radial artery puncture for diagnostic angiography. If there is graft puncture, use a duplex-guided puncture followed by manual or duplex-guided compression. Conduct close checkups on the distal circulation after angiography.
Extended follow-up with linked registries helps identify transferred patients with late death after injury.