Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Evolving Role of Laparoscopy in Colonic Diverticular Disease: A Systematic Review

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A PubMed search of the biomedical literature was carried out to systematically review the role of laparoscopy in colonic diverticular disease. All original reports comparing elective laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and open colon resection for diverticular disease of the colon, as well as original reports evaluating outcomes after laparoscopic lavage for acute diverticulitis, were considered. Of the 21 articles chosen for final review, nine evaluated laparoscopic versus open elective resection, six compared hand-assisted colon resection versus conventional laparoscopic resection, and six considered laparoscopic lavage. Five were randomized controlled trials.

Results

Elective laparoscopic colon resection for diverticular disease is associated with increased operative time, decreased postoperative pain, fewer postoperative complications, less paralytic ileus, and shorter hospital stay compared to open colectomy. Laparoscopic lavage and drainage appears to be a safe and effective therapy for selected patients with complicated diverticulitis.

Conclusions

Elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity compared to open colectomy, leading to shorter hospital stay and fewer costs. Laparoscopic lavage has an increasing but poorly defined role in complicated diverticulitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks TG (1969) Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. A review of 521 cases. Br Med J 4:639–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rafferty J, Shellito P, Hyman NH et al (2006) Standards Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (2006) Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Gastroenterological Association (2001) The Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases. American Gastroenterological Association, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheskin LJ, Bohlman M, Schuster MM (1990) Diverticular disease in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 19:391–403

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boles RS Jr, Jordan SM (1958) The clinical significance of diverticulosis. Gastroenterology 35:579–582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Munson KD, Hensien MA, Jacob LN et al (1996) Diverticulitis. A comprehensive followup. Dis Colon Rectum 39:318–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman J, Davies M, Wolff B et al (2005) Complicated diverticulitis: is it time to rethink the rules? Ann Surg 242:576–581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ambrosetti P, Robert J, Witzig JA et al (1992) Prognostic factors from computed tomography in acute left colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 79:117–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neff CC, vanSonnenberg E, Casola G et al (1987) Diverticular abscesses: percutaneous drainage. Radiology 163:15–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stabile BE, Puccio E, vanSonnenberg E et al (1990) Preoperative percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscesses. Am J Surg 159:99–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar RR, Kim JT, Haukoos JS et al (2006) Factors affecting the successful management of intra-abdominal abscesses with antibiotics and the need for percutaneous drainage. Dis Colon Rectum 49:183–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brandt D, Gervaz P, Durmishi Y et al (2006) Percutaneous CT scan-guided drainage vs antibiotherapy alone for Hinchey II diverticulitis: a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cinat ME, Wilson SE, Din AM (2002) Determinants for successful percutaneous image-guided drainage of intra-abdominal abscess. Arch Surg 137:845–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiser AM, Jiang JK, Lake JP et al (2005) The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 100:910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mueller MH, Glatzle J, Kasparek MS et al (2005) Long-term outcome of conservative treatment in patients with diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:649–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: evolution to a clinically useful technique. Dis Colon Rectum 47:753–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayo WJ (1907) Acquired diverticulitis of the large intestine. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 5:8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Killingback MJ (1970) Acute diverticulitis: progress report, Australasian survey (1967–1969). Dis Colon Rectum 13:444–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Klarenbeek BR, Veenhof AA, Bergamaschi R et al (2009) Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial: short-term results of the Sigma Trial. Ann Surg 249:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Raue W, Paolucci V, Asperger W, the LAPDIV-CAMIC Trial Group et al (2011) Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease has no advantages over open approach: midterm results of a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:973–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T et al (2010) A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg 252:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mattar SG et al (2004) Laparoscopic vs open resection for the treatment of diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 18:276–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S et al (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Faynsod M, Stamos MJ, Arnell T et al (2000) A case-control study of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 66:841–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bruce CJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ et al (1996) Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S1–S6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ et al (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  29. HALS Study Group (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 14:896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW et al (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:818–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N et al (2006) Laparoscopic vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:464–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson J, Luchtefeld M, Dujovny N et al (2007) A comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assist and open sigmoid resection in the treatment of diverticular disease. Am J Surg 193:400–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC et al (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance? Surg Endosc 19:656–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hassan I, You NY, Cima RR et al (2008) Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice. Surg Endosc 22:739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Myers E, Hurley M, O’Sullivan GC et al (2008) Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 95:97–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Franklin ME Jr, Portillo G, Trevino JM et al (2008) Long-term experience with the laparoscopic approach to perforated diverticulitis plus generalized peritonitis. World J Surg 32:1507–1511. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9463-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Karoui M, Champault A, Pautrat K et al (2009) Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma for Hinchey 3 complicated diverticulitis: results of a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:609–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. White SI, Frenkiel B, Martin PJ (2010) A ten-year audit of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: hghlighting the outcomes of laparoscopic lavage. Dis Colon Rectum 53:15–1537

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mazza D, Chio F, Khoury-Helou A (2009) Traitement laparoscopique conservateur des peritonites diverticulaires. J Chirug 146:265–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bretagnol F, Pautrat K, Mor C et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic management of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: a promising alternative to more radical procedures. J Am Coll Surg 206:654–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Klarenbeek BR, Bergamaschi R, Veenhof AA et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: follow-up assessment of the randomized control Sigma trial. Surg Endosc 25:1121–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lawrence DM, Pasquale MD, Wasser TE (2003) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 69:499–503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Alves A, Panis Y, Slim K et al (2005) French multicentre prospective observational study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Br J Surg 92:1520–1525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hinojosa MW, Murrell ZA, Konyalian VR et al (2007) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open sigmoid colectomy for benign and malignant disease at academic medical centers. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1423–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18:577–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW et al (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Taylor CJ, Layani L, Ghusn MA et al (2006) Perforated diverticulitis managed by laparoscopic lavage. Aust N Z J Surg 76:962–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mutter D, Bouras G, Forgione A et al (2006) Two-stage totally minimally invasive approach for acute complicated diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 8:501–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Moloo H, Haggar F, Coyle D et al. (2010) Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(10):CD006585

  50. Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI et al (2008) Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:1769–1780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Afshar S, Kurer MA (2012) Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 14:135–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang B. Gaertner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaertner, W.B., Kwaan, M.R., Madoff, R.D. et al. The Evolving Role of Laparoscopy in Colonic Diverticular Disease: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 37, 629–638 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1872-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1872-x

Keywords

Navigation