Skip to main content
Log in

Case-Based Learning in Surgery: Lessons Learned

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to obtain a deepened understanding of the implementation process of case-based learning (CBL) during a surgical semester at the Undergraduate Medical Program at Karolinska Institutet. The objectives are to identify the level of success of the implementation and to identify practical and theoretical implications of importance in connection to the process.

Methods

Based on a qualitative study design, the study explores students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the educational intervention CBL in context. Five faculty members involved in the entire reform and five students from the second cohort were interviewed 1 year into the implementation phase. Narrative data from the semistructured interviews were coded using a blend of an inductive and deductive approach to derive the coding categories.

Results

The results of the study reflect two overarching themes: the importance of a well-functioning implementation process and the misalignment between the student/faculty Teaching Learning Regime and the attributes of CBL. The findings have resulted in a checklist for implementation of CBL in a surgical curriculum.

Conclusions

The implementation of CBL was not satisfactory. Still, exposure of the weaknesses of the implementation process, the misalignment between CBL and the reigning teaching and learning regime, and promotion of the future use of the checklist are key to future successful implementation of CBL in any surgical undergraduate curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Medical Case Center’s (Karolinska Institutet) mission is to promote student-activating learning activities in the various health professional programs and to promote the development of learning and educational leadership in professional health education.

References

  1. Biggs J, Tang C (2007) Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press, London, pp 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knowles M, Holton EF III, Swanson RA et al (1998) The adult learner. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, pp 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schön D (1984) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York, pp 276–278

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sampson J, Cohen R (2001) In: Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J et al (eds) Peer learning in higher education. Kogan Page, London, pp 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nordquist J, Sundberg K, Johansson L et al (2011) Case–verktyg för Professionslärande. Liber, Solna, pp 97–130

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garvin DA (2003) Making the case: professional education for the world of practice. Harv Mag 106:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wasserman S (1994) Introduction to case method teaching: a guide to the galaxy. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 26–36

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barnes LB, Christensen R, Hansen AI et al (1987) Teaching and the case method: instructor’s guide. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JL (2006) Evaluating training programs. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, pp 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2005) Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W (2008) Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 337:a1035. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. May T (2001) Social research. Issues, methods and process. Open University Press, Maidenhead, p 121

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trowler P, Cooper A (2002) Teaching and learning regimes: implicit theories and recurring practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. High Educ Res Dev 21:221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nordquist J, Grigsby RK (2011) Medical schools viewed from a political perspective: how political skills can improve education leadership. Med Educ 45:1174–1180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien BC et al (2010) Educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freidson E (1970) Professions of medicine: a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. Dodd and Mead, New York, pp 31–32

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA et al (2010) Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 376:1923–1956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experiences as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, pp 76–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Sundberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nordquist, J., Sundberg, K., Johansson, L. et al. Case-Based Learning in Surgery: Lessons Learned. World J Surg 36, 945–955 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1396-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1396-9

Keywords

Navigation