Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Limberg Flap and Tension-Free Primary Closure During Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pilonidal disease is an inflammatory disease seen in the intergluteal region. In this study, our aim was to compare the efficacy of the Limberg flap versus a tension-free primary closure.

Methods

A total of 93 patients were included in this study. The patients were assigned consecutively by the closed-envelope technique to one of two groups: 49 patients in group 1 (excision and Limberg flap) and 44 patients in group 2 (tension-free primary closure). Excision and reconstruction with the Limberg flap was performed in its classic form. For tension-free primary closure after excision of the sinus tract with an elliptical incision, the skin and subcutaneous tissue were released 2–3 cm away from the incision line. The subcutaneous tissue was closed twofold with 2/0 polyglactin sutures. The skin underwent 3/0 polypropylene mattress suturing.

Results

The median age was 25 years (17–43 years). The median follow-up period was 29.5 months (8–43 months). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, follow-up time, or anesthesia method. One patient in each group experienced wound infection. During the first 6 months of follow-up there was no recurrence. However, at later visits recurrences were seen in two patients in each group (4.1% in group 1, 4.5% in group 2).

Conclusions

The lower rates of wound infection and recurrence associated with the Limberg flap reported elsewhere may be associated with healing of the tension-free procedure. In this study, tension-free primary closure was found to be as effective as the Limberg flap reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2007) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:CD006213

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunköy A et al (1999) Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg 165:339–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alemderoğlu K, Akçal T, Buğra D (2003) Pilonidal Hastalık. Kolon Rektum ve Anal Bölge Hastalıkları, vol 1. Baskı, İstanbul, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karydakis GE (1992) Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg 62:385–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harlak A, Menteş Ö, Kilic S et al (2010) Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: analysis of previously proposed risk factors. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conroy FJ, Kandamany N, Mahaffey PJ (2008) Laser depilation and hygiene: preventing recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:1069–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Odili J, Gault D (2002) Laser depilation of the natal cleft: an aid to healing the pilonidal sinus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:29–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ağca B, Altınlı E, Duran Y et al (2002) Comparison of Limberg and primary reconstruction in treatment of pilonidal sinus. Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi 16:152–154

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahdy T (2008) Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1816–1822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Al Hassan HK, Francis IM, Heglen P (1990) Primary closure or secondary granulation after excision of pilonidal sinus. Acta Chir Scand 156:144–146

    Google Scholar 

  11. Çubukçu A, Gönüllü NN, Paksoy M et al (2000) The role of the obesity on the recurrence of pilonidal sinus disease in patients, who were treated by excision and Limberg flap transposition. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:173–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Akça T, Çolak T, Ustunsoy B et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing primary closure with the Limberg flap in the treatment of the primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Br J Surg 92:1081–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muzi MG, Milito G, Cadeddu F et al (2010) Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 200:9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Topgül K, Özdemir E, Kılıç K et al (2003) Long-term result of Limberg flap procedure for treatment of pilonidal sinus: a report of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1545–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cihan A, Menteş BB, Tatlıcıoğlu E et al (2004) Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery. ANZ J Surg 74:238–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tavassoli A, Noorshafiee S, Nazarzadeh R (2011) Comparison of excision with primary repair versus Limberg flap. Int J Surg 9:343–346. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey

    Ahmet Okuş, Barış Sevinç, Ömer Karahan & Mehmet A. Eryılmaz

  2. Konya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Meram Yeniyol, Meram, Konya, Turkey

    Barış Sevinç

Authors
  1. Ahmet Okuş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barış Sevinç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ömer Karahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehmet A. Eryılmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barış Sevinç.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okuş, A., Sevinç, B., Karahan, Ö. et al. Comparison of Limberg Flap and Tension-Free Primary Closure During Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. World J Surg 36, 431–435 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1333-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1333-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation