Abstract
Background
Although clinicians are often criticized for giving inadequate information to patients with cancer, current recommendations to “provide full information” or “all the information patients want” are impractical. We therefore examined how surgeons manage information-giving to patients with breast cancer in practice, and how their approach compared with what patients wanted.
Study design
We interviewed 20 patients consulting after surgery in a specialist breast unit, and the eight surgeons whom they consulted. Qualitative analysis examined surgeon and patient perspectives on the purposes of information.
Results
Surgeons and patients both stated the importance of “honesty” and “telling everything” but surgeons did not want to tell everything they could and patients did not want to hear it. Patients wanted information mainly to maintain hope, demonstrate the surgeon’s expertise, and sustain a personal clinical relationship. Surgeons shaped their information-giving for the same reasons while providing necessary information about histology and treatment.
Conclusions
Surgeons and patients agreed strikingly about the purposes of information and indicated that giving information is a more complex task than current recommendations imply. We suggest that expert recommendations should catch up with practice rather than the reverse. That is, if recommendations are to reflect patients’ real rather than assumed needs, and be realistic about how surgeons can meet these needs, the recommendations should be informed by knowledge of how patients and surgeons already reconcile these needs in clinical practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Owen R, Jeffrey D (2008) Communication: common challenging scenarios in cancer care. Eur J Cancer 44:1163–1168
Fallowfield L (2009) The challenge of interacting with patients in oncology. Eur J Cancer 45(Suppl 1):445–446
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Supportive and palliative care: improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer
Eggly S, Penner L, Albrecht TL et al (2006) Discussing bad news in the outpatient oncology clinic: rethinking current communication guidelines. J Clin Oncol 24:716–719
Downie R, Randall F (2005) Truth-telling and consent. In: Doyle D, Hanks G, Cherny NI (eds) Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 61–65
Jefford M, Tattersall MH (2002) Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. Lancet Oncol 3:629–637
Kukla R (2007) How do patients know. Hastings Cent Rep 37:27–35
Elwyn G, Miron-Shatz T (2010) Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expect 13:139–147
Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C et al (2010) The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives. Soc Sci Med 70:1904–1911
Henman MJ, Butow PN, Brown RF et al (2002) Lay constructions of decision-making in cancer. Psychooncology 11:295–306
Legare F, Ratte S, Stacey D et al (2010) Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5
Curtis JR, Engelberg R, Young JP et al (2008) An approach to understanding the interaction of hope and desire for explicit prognostic information among individuals with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or advanced cancer. J Palliat Med 11:610–620
Salander P, Bergenheim T, Henriksson R (1996) The creation of protection and hope in patients with malignant brain tumours. Soc Sci Med 42:985–996
Salmon P, Mendick N, Young B (2011) Integrative qualitative communication analysis of consultation and patient and practitioner perspectives: towards a theory of authentic caring in clinical relationships. Patient Educ Couns 82:448–454
Mays N, Pope C (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J 320(7226):50–52
Ely M, Anzul M, Freidman T et al (1991) Doing qualitative research [electronic book]: circles within circles, London. Falmer Press, New York
McKneally ME, Martin DK (2000) An entrustment model of consent for surgical treatment of life-threatening illness: perspective of patients requiring esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:264–269
McKneally MF, Martin DK, Ignagni E et al (2009) Responding to trust: surgeons’ perspective on informed consent. World J Surg 33:1341–1347. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0021-7
Kutner JS, Steiner JF, Corbett KK et al (1999) Information needs in terminal illness. Soc Sci Med 48:1341–1352
Kennedy V, Lloyd-Williams M (2006) Maintaining hope: communication in palliative care. Recent Results Cancer Res 168:47–60
Helft PR (2005) Necessary collusion: prognostic communication with advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:3146–3150
Ruddick W (1999) Hope and deception. Bioethics 13:343–357
Lamont EB, Christakis NA (2001) Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life. Ann Intern Med 134:1096–1105
Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (1999) Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. Eur J Cancer 35:1592–1597
Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (2004) Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet 363(9405):312–319
Arora NK, Johnson P, Gustafson DH et al (2002) Barriers to information access, perceived health competence, and psychosocial health outcomes: test of a mediation model in a breast cancer sample. Patient Educ Couns 47:37–46
Coulter A (1999) Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there’s no going back. Br Med J 319:719–720
Epstein RM, Street RLJ (eds) (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Fallowfield L, Ratcliffe D, Jenkins V et al (2001) Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer 84:1011–1015
Salmon P, Young B (2009) Dependence and caring in clinical communication: the relevance of attachment and other theories. Patient Educ Couns 74:331–338
Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 362(9391):1225–1230
Kleinman A (1999) Moral experience and ethical reflection: can ethnography reconcile them? A quandary for “the new bioethics”. Daedalus 128:69–97
Salmon P, Young B (2011) Creativity in clinical communication: from communication skills to skilled communication. Med Educ 45:217–226
Butow PN, Dowsett S, Hagerty R et al (2002) Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know? Support Care Cancer 10:161–168
Leydon GM (2008) “Yours is potentially serious but most of these are cured”: optimistic communication in UK outpatient oncology consultations. Psychooncology 17:1081–1088
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the surgeons, breast care nurses, and patients of the Linda McCartney Centre for their enthusiastic cooperation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendick, N., Young, B., Holcombe, C. et al. Telling “Everything” but not “Too Much”: The Surgeon’s Dilemma in Consultations about Breast Cancer. World J Surg 35, 2187–2195 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1195-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1195-3