Skip to main content

Survival After Liver Transplantation Using Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Donor Allografts: Case-Controlled Analysis of the UNOS Database

Abstract

Background

Numerous reports have documented reduced graft and patient survival after use of hepatitis C (HCV) seropositive allografts in liver transplantation (OLT). We aimed to examine if the use of a HCV+ liver allograft affects patient and graft survivals compared to HCV− donor allografts in a case-controlled analysis of the united network for organ sharing (UNOS) database.

Methods

We examined 63,149 liver transplants (61,905 donors HCV−; 1,244 donors HCV+) from the UNOS standard transplant analysis and research (STAR) file from 1987 to 2007. Donor and recipient demographics and outcomes were collected in which donor HCV serology was complete. A case-controlled cohort from 11 donor and recipient variables comparing donor HCV− and HCV+ allografts (n = 540 in each group) was created using propensity scores with a matching algorithm. Graft and patient survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

Results

Significant differences were evident in the unadjusted cohort between recipients who received HCV+ and HCV− allografts, including HCV+ recipients, donor and recipient age, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception cases. Use of HCV+ allograft resulted in significantly lower graft survival (8.1 vs. 10.6 years; P = 0.001) and patient survival (10.2 vs. 12.3 years; P = 0.01) after OLT. In the matched cohort, HCV seropositivity had no detrimental effect on the graft (P = 0.57) or patient (P = 0.78) survival after OLT.

Conclusions

This is the first population-based analysis to show that after adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics there was no difference in graft or patient survival with the use of HCV+ donor liver allografts compared to HCV− donor liver allografts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. United Network for Organ Sharing (2009) Transplant patient data source. Available at http://www.patients.unos.org/data.htm. Accessed 19 Aug 2009

  2. Pereira B, Milford E, Kirkman R (1992) Prevalence of HCV RNA in hepatitis C antibody positive cadaver organ donors and their recipients. N Engl J Med 327:910–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dominguez-Gil B, Morales JM (2009) Transplantation in the patient with hepatitis C. Transplant Int 22:1117–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubin D (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127:757–763

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Austin P, Grootendorst P, Normand SL et al (2007) Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med 26:754–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khapra AP, Agarwal K, Fiel MI et al (2006) Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts. Liver Transpl 12:1496–1503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghobrial RM, Seadman R, Gornbein J et al (2001) A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients. Ann Surg 234:384–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Terrault NA, Shiffman ML, Lok AS et al (2007) Outcomes in hepatitis C virus-infected recipients of living donor vs. deceased donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 13:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vargas HE, Laskus T, Wang LF et al (1999) Outcome of liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-infected patients who received hepatitis C virus-infected grafts. Gastroenterology 117:149–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Testa G, Vidanovic V, Chejfec G et al (2008) Adult living-donor liver transplantation with ABO-incompatible grafts. Transplantation 85:681–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Velidedeoglu E, Desai NM, Campos L et al (2002) The outcome of liver grafts procured from hepatitis C-positive donors. Transplantation 73:582–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Axelrod D, Schnitzler M, Salvalaggio PR et al (2007) The economic impact of the utilization of liver allografts with high donor risk index. Am J Transpl 7:990–997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by an award from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons Faculty Development (SAS).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no disclosures to report, and no conflicts of interest exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimul A. Shah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burr, A.T., Li, Y., Tseng, J.F. et al. Survival After Liver Transplantation Using Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Donor Allografts: Case-Controlled Analysis of the UNOS Database. World J Surg 35, 1590–1595 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1019-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1019-5

Keywords

  • Propensity Score
  • Graft Survival
  • Donor Liver
  • Matched Cohort
  • Liver Allograft