Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expanding Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Rural Mongolia

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy was first introduced in Mongolia in 1994, the benefits of the laparoscopic approach have been largely unavailable to the majority of the population. The burden of gallbladder disease in Mongolia is significant. Despite the barriers to expanding laparoscopic surgery in Mongolia (lack of physical resources and adequate training opportunities, a difficult political situation, and an austere environment), the Health Sciences University of Mongolia (HSUM) began looking for ways to further the development of laparoscopy for the entire country, including the rural areas where half the population resides.

Methods

Combined didactic and practical training courses lasting 2 weeks were developed collaboratively by a private nongovernmental organization and HSUM. The courses were taught at tertiary care centers in the capital city (Ulaanbaatar) and in a smaller, rural city (Erdenet), the regional northern referral center. Demographic data, preoperative diagnosis, ultrasound and operative findings, operative times, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were compared from 2007–2008 from hospitals in Ulaanbaatar and Erdenet.

Results

A total of 36 surgeons participated in the training classes, and a total of 410 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. Ultrasound was used as a diagnostic tool in all cases. There was no significant difference in intraoperative or postoperative complications between hospitals in the capital, where the procedures were performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons, and in Erdenet, where the training courses first introduced laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Neither were there differences in complication rates between cases during the teaching and nonteaching periods.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be expanded safely to the regional diagnostic referral centers in rural Mongolia through short-term training courses as a method to markedly improve access and outcomes for the 50% of the country previously denied the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Udwadia TE (2007) Navigating laparoscopic surgery into the next decade in developing countries—a personal perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozgediz D, Hsia R, Weiser T et al (2009) Population health metrics for surgery: effective coverage of surgical services in low-income and middle-income countries. World J Surg 33:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. deVries C, Price R (2010) Global surgery and public health: a new paradigm. Jones and Bartlett Publishing, Sudbury, MA. (ISBN-13: 978-0-7637-8048-7)

  4. Rusher AH (1999) Outreach surgery. Surgical technology arrives in Mongolia. Bull Am Coll Surg 84:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sergelen O (2006) Development of Laparoscopic Surgery in Mongolia. Available at: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_education_En/PGC_RH_2006/Reviews/pdf/Orgoi_laparoscopy_2006.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2010

  6. National Center for Health Development (2007) Health Indicators 2006. Health Statistics Department, Ulaanbataar National Center for Health Development 93

  7. Cagir B, Rangraj M, Maffuci L et al (1994) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:419–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Muyanga J, Ghoor FO, Modiba MC (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in black patients at Ga-Rankuwa Hospital: a feasibility study. Cent Afr J Med 45:176–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ralls PW, Collettu PM, Lapin SA et al (1985) Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis. Prospective evaluation of primary and secondary signs. Radiology 155:767–771

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Udwadia TE, Patil SU, Udwadia RT et al (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in India. Int Surg 77:149–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

G. Nyamkhuu, O. Sergelen: Chiefs of Surgery HSUM requested and organized training and facilitated data collection. P. Batcholuun, B. Lkhagvabayer: Surgeons, translators, for UB and Erdenet. N. Altanchimet, N. Batsaikhan, Ch. Bulgan, Ts. Narmandakh, B. Onon, U. Sanchin: Surgeons submitting data from UB. P. Batcholuun, B. Batsukh, M. Battuvshin: Surgeons submitting data from Erdenet Swanson Family Foundation: Private Non-governmental organization funding and organizing surgical training in Mongolia. Generous donors: Mrs. Storz and Karl Storz GMBH & Co., Ethicon Endo-Surgical Inc., Covidien, Cook Medical, and Cardinal Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond R. Price.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Straub, C.M., Price, R.R., Matthews, D. et al. Expanding Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Rural Mongolia. World J Surg 35, 751–759 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-0965-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-0965-2

Keywords

Navigation