Abstract
Background
Prolonged air leakage is common after lung resection. We observed that during deep inspiration some patients were able to empty the water-seal of commercial chest drainage systems and retract air back into the chest tube, which subsequently escaped during the following expiration, mimicking “true” air leakage. This led us to perform in vitro and in vivo pressure measurements in chest tube systems and investigate possible relationships with “false” air.
Methods
Commercially available one- and three-chamber drainage systems were used as models for large and small water-seals, respectively. Digital pressure measurements were performed in vitro and in ten selected patients with clinical suspicion of reverse airflow.
Results
Repeated measurements in the laboratory demonstrated that in three-chamber chest drainage systems with small water-seals a negative pressure below −30.4 cmH2O led to emptying of the water-seal with retrograde flow of air. Retrograde airflow was not possible in one-chamber chest drainage systems. In vivo measurements demonstrated that six of ten highly selected patients were able to create negative pressures below −30.4 cmH2O during deep inspiration.
Conclusion
During deep inspiration some patients are able to create negative pressure large enough to empty small water-seals in commercial chest drainage systems and retract air back into the chest tube. This excess air escapes during the following expiration and may mislead interpretation of continued air leakage even when there is none, subsequently resulting in prolonged and unnecessary chest tube drainage. Any surgeon who treats patients with chest tubes should be aware of this phenomenon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Murthy SC (2006) Air leak and pleural space management. Thorac Surg Clin 16:261–265
Okereke I, Murthy SC, Alster JM et al (2005) Characterization and importance of air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 79:1167–1173
Cerfolio RJ, Bass CS, Pask AH et al (2002) Predictors and treatment of persistent air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1727–1730
Robinson LA, Preksto D (1998) Pleural tenting during upper lobectomy decreases chest tube time and total hospitalization days. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:319–326
Bardell T, Petsikas D (2003) What keeps postpulmonary resection patients in hospital? Can Respir J 10:86–89
Brunelli A, Al Refai M, Muti M et al (2000) Pleural tent after upper lobectomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1722–1724
Brunelli A, Al Refai M, Monteverde M et al (2002) Pleural tent after upper lobectomy: a randomized study of efficacy and duration of effect. Ann Thorac Surg 74:1958–1962
Abolhoda A, Liu D, Brooks A et al (1998) Prolonged air leak following radical upper lobectomy: an analysis of incidence and possible risk factors. Chest 113:1507–1510
Loran DB, Woodside KJ, Cerfolio RJ et al (2002) Predictors of alveolar air leaks. Chest Surg Clin N Am 12:477–488
Cerfolio RJ, Minnich DJ, Bryant AS (2009) The removal of chest tubes despite an air leak or a pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1690–1694
Rice TW, Okereke IC, Blackstone EH (2002) Persistent air-leak following pulmonary resection. Chest Surg Clin N Am 12:529–539
Cerfolio RJ, Varela G, Brunelli A (2010) Digital and smart chest drainage systems to monitor air leaks: the birth of a new era? Thorac Surg Clin 20:413–420
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stouby, A., Neckelmann, K. & Licht, P.B. Reverse Airflow in Certain Chest Drains May be Misinterpreted as Prolonged Air Leakage. World J Surg 35, 596–599 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0943-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0943-0