Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Angiointervention: High Rates of Failure Following Blunt Renal Injuries

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Nonoperative management (NOM) of solid organ injury after blunt trauma is now standard. Recently, angioembolization (AE) has been used to extend NOM. Few data exist on evaluating NOM of blunt renal injuries (BRIs). We sought to determine the overall efficacy of NOM as well as the outcome of AE in patients with BRI.

Methods

The trauma registry was used to identify all patients with BRI between January 2002 and December 2008. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, grade of injury, use of angiographic intervention, and outcome.

Results

A total of 434 patients with BRI were identified, 416 of whom had planned NOM; 337 (81%) patients were successfully managed without further intervention for their BRI. In all, 79 (19%) patients underwent angiography; 22 (27.8%) of these patients underwent AE, and 6 (27.2%) failed 1.2 ± 0.8 days after AE. Patients who failed AE had a significantly higher blood transfusion requirement during the first 24 h of admission (p = 0.01). Seven patients not embolized failed 1.9 ± 1.9 days after angiography. Thus, of the 79 patients having angiography, 13 (16.5%) failed and required laparotomy to treat their BRIs. Overall failure rate of NOM was 3.1% (13/416). Patients who failed angiography, with or without AE, required more blood during the first 24 h after admission (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

NOM of BRI is safe and effective, with an overall failure rate of 3.1%. However, angiography with or without AE has substantial failure rates. Patients with higher-grade injuries and active vascular extravasation on admission computed tomography scan also fail NOM regardless of therapy. The blood transfusion requirement during the first 24 h may indicate who will require operative intervention following angiography. Close observation and/or early laparotomy are wise for these high-risk patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bretan PN Jr, McAninch JW, Ferdele MP et al (1986) Computerized tomographic staging of renal trauma: 85 consecutive cases. J Urol 136:561–565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matthews LA, Spirnak JP (1995) The nonoperative approach to major blunt renal trauma. Semin Urol 13:77–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wessells H, Suh D, Porter JR et al (2003) Renal injury and operative management in the United States: results of a population-based study. J Trauma 54:423–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goff CD, Collin GR (1998) Management of renal trauma at a rural, level I trauma center. Am Surg 64:226–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen HT, Carroll PR (1995) Blunt renal trauma: renal preservation through careful staging and selective surgery. Semin Urol 13:83–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kristjánsson A, Pederson J (1993) Management of blunt renal trauma. Br J Urol 72:692–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cass AS, Luxenberg M (1983) Conservative or immediate surgical management of blunt renal injuries. J Urol 130:11–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wein AJ, Murphy JJ, Mulholland SG et al (1977) A conservative approach to the management of blunt renal trauma. J Urol 117:425–427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthews LA, Smith EM, Spirnak JP (1997) Nonoperative treatment of major blunt renal lacerations with urinary extravasation. J Urol 157:2056–2058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moudouni SM, Patard JJ, Manunta A et al (2001) A conservative approach to major blunt renal lacerations with urinary extravasation and devitalized renal segments. BJU Int 87:290–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Altman AL, Haas C, Dinchman KH et al (2000) Selective nonoperative management of blunt grade 5 renal injury. J Urol 164:27–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohr AM, Lavery RF, Barone A et al (2003) Angiographic embolization for liver injuries: low mortality, high morbidity. J Trauma 55:1077–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haan JM, Bochicchio GV, Kraner N et al (2005) Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 5-year experience. J Trauma 58:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagiwara A, Sakaki S, Goto H et al (2001) The role of interventional radiology in the management of blunt renal injury: a practical protocol. J Trauma 51:526–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vignoil C, Lonzi S, Bargellini I et al (2004) Vascular injuries after percutaneous renal procedures: treatment by transcatheter embolization. Eur Radiol 14:723–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Beaujeux R, Saussine C, Al-Fakir A et al (1995) Superselective endo-vascular treatment of renal vascular lesions. J Urol 153:14–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Breyer BN, McAninch JW, Elliott SP et al (2008) Minimally invasive endovascular techniques to treat acute renal hemorrhage. J Urol 179:2248–2253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chatziioannou A, Brountzous E, Primetis E et al (2004) Effects of superselective embolization for renal vascular injuries on renal parenchyma and function. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28:201–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dinkel HP, Danuser H, Triller J (2002) Blunt renal trauma: minimally invasive management with microcatheter embolization: experience in nine patients. Radiology 223:723–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL et al (1989) Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma 29:1664–1666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Herschorn S, Radomski SB, Shoskes DA et al (1991) Evaluation and treatment of blunt renal trauma. J Urol 146:274–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baverstock R, Simons R, McLoughlin M (2001) Severe blunt renal trauma: a 7-year retrospective review from a provincial trauma centre. Can J Urol 8:1372–1376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cass AS, Ireland GW (1973) Comparison of the conservative and surgical management of the more severe degrees of renal trauma in multiple inured patients. J Urol 109:8–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Toutouzas KG, Karaiskakis M, Kaminski A et al (2002) Nonoperative management of blunt renal injury: a prospective study. Am Surg 68:1097–1103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thall EH, Stone NN, Cheng DL et al (1996) Conservative management of penetrating and blunt type III renal injuries. Br J Urol 77:512–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu CY, Wu SC, Chen RJ et al (2010) Evaluation of need for angioembolization in blunt renal injury: discontinuity of Gerota’s fascia has an increased probability of requiring angioembolization. Am J Surg 199:154–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bookstein JJ, Goldstein HM (1973) Successful management of postbiopsy arteriovenous fistula with selective arterial embolization. Radiology 109:535–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nuss GR, Morey AF, Jenkins AC et al (2009) Radiographic predictors of need for angiographic embolization after traumatic renal injury. J Trauma 67:578–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sofocleous CT, Hinrichs C, Hubbi B et al (2005) Angiographic findings and embolotherapy in renal artery trauma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 28:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson BE, Munera F, Cohn SM et al (2006) Novel computed tomography scan scoring system predicts the need for intervention after splenic injury. J Trauma 60:1083–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Davis KA, Fabian TC, Croce MA et al (1998) Improved success in nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: embolization of splenic artery pseudoaneurysms. J Trauma 44:1008–1015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Haan J, Scott J, Boyd-Kranis RL et al (2001) Admission angiography for blunt splenic injury: advantages and pitfalls. J Trauma 51:1161–1165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sclafani SA, Shaftan GW, Scalea TM et al (1995) Nonoperative salvage of computed tomography-diagnosed splenic injuries: utilization of angiography for triage and embolization for hemostasis. J Trauma 39:818–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Division Trauma/Critical Care, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene Street, T1R60, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Jay Menaker, Deborah M. Stein & Thomas M. Scalea

  2. University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Bellal Joseph

Authors
  1. Jay Menaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bellal Joseph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deborah M. Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas M. Scalea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Menaker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menaker, J., Joseph, B., Stein, D.M. et al. Angiointervention: High Rates of Failure Following Blunt Renal Injuries. World J Surg 35, 520–527 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0927-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0927-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation