Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Unplanned Conversion to Thoracotomy During Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy does not Compromise the Surgical Outcome

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Concerns remain unresolved regarding the safety of unplanned conversion to open thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. We analyzed both early and late outcomes after thoracotomy conversion from VATS.

Methods

From December 2003 to December 2008, a total of 738 VATS lobectomies were attempted. Among them were 34 unplanned conversions to open thoracotomy. Patient characteristics, operative data, and early and late postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Among the 34 conversion cases, 26 patients had lung cancer and 8 had benign lung disease. The conversion rate was 4.61%. Left and right upper lobectomies were most often associated with unplanned conversions. Conversion was classified into five groups: (1) problems related to anthracofibrosis of hilar lymph nodes in 14 patients; (2) intraoperative vessel or bronchus injury in 11 patients; (3) fused interlobar fissure in 4 patients; (4) oncologic problems, including mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastasis in 2 patients; and (5) vascular anomalies in 3 patients. There was one death due to postoperative pneumonia in a patient with multiple co-morbidities. Two patients had an episode of pneumonia. The mean hospital stay was 10 days, and the median follow-up period was 30.0 ± 11.47 months. Three patients with lung cancer developed recurrent disease, all of whom were found to have stage III disease. No cancer-related death occurred. There was no significant difference in survival or recurrence between patients with conversion and those with successful VATS. However, the operating time and hospital stay were significantly longer in conversion patients.

Conclusions

Our data support the claim that VATS lobectomy can be safely performed with an acceptable conversion rate. Unplanned conversion to open thoracotomy does not appear to compromise the prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F et al (1992) Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2:244–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Ferson PF et al (1992) Thoracoscopic resection of 85 pulmonary lesions. Ann Thorac Surg 54:415–419 discussion 419–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiraishi T, Hiratsuka M, Yoshinaga Y et al (2008) Thoracoscopic lobectomy with systemic lymph node dissection for lymph node positive non-small cell lung cancer: is thoracoscopic lymph node dissection feasible? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56:162–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Shen KR et al (2009) Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Mayo Clin Proc 84:509–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reed MF, Lucia MW, Starnes SL et al (2008) Thoracoscopic lobectomy: introduction of a new technique into a thoracic surgery training program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:376–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicastri DG, Wisnivesky JP, Litle VR et al (2008) Thoracoscopic lobectomy: report on safety, discharge independence, pain, and chemotherapy tolerance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:642–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG et al (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2553–2562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Walker WS, Codispoti M, Soon SY et al (2003) Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB (2006) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1, 100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81:421–425 discussion 425–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solaini L, Prusciano F, Bagioni P et al (2008) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the lung: analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications over 15 years and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 22:298–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawada S, Komori E, Yamashita M (2009) Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy requiring emergency conversion to thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36:487–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones RO, Casali G, Walker WS (2008) Does failed video-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer prejudice immediate and long-term outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg 86:235–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim K, Kim HK, Park JS et al (2010) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: single institutional experience with 704 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 89:S2118–S2122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw JP, Dembitzer FR, Wisnivesky JP et al (2008) Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: state of the art and future directions. Ann Thorac Surg 85:S705–S709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim J et al (2010) Outcomes of unexpected pathologic N1 and N2 disease after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:1288–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea

    Joon Suk Park, Hong Kwan Kim, Yong Soo Choi, Jhingook Kim, Young Mog Shim & Kwhanmien Kim

Authors
  1. Joon Suk Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong Kwan Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Soo Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jhingook Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Young Mog Shim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kwhanmien Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwhanmien Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, J.S., Kim, H.K., Choi, Y.S. et al. Unplanned Conversion to Thoracotomy During Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy does not Compromise the Surgical Outcome. World J Surg 35, 590–595 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0913-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0913-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation