Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changing Approaches to Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients: A 10-Year Retrospective Study in Taiwan

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of symptomatic gallbladder diseases increases with age. The present study evaluated cholecystectomy risk factors and hospital resource utilization in an elderly (aged 60 years and older) population of patients who had undergone open cholecystectomy (OC) or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

The study analyzed 20,538 OC and 29,318 LC procedures performed in Taiwan from 1996 to 2007. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the relative change rate. Regression models were employed to predict length of stay (LOS) and total surgical cost.

Results

Patient characteristics associated with increased likelihood of undergoing LC were age 60–69 years, female gender, and lack of current co-morbidities. Length of stay associated with both OC and LC decreased during the study period. Total surgical cost for elderly OC patients increased during the study period, whereas that for elderly LC patients declined. Compared to OC patients, LC patients had significantly larger changes in LOS (−2.27 days) and total surgical cost ($ −368.64 U.S. dollars) (p < 0.001). The following factors were associated with considerable increases in both LOS and total surgical cost: advanced age, female gender, presence of one or more co-morbidities, treatment in a regional or a district hospital, and long LOS.

Conclusions

Decreases in hospital resource utilization were larger in elderly LC patients than in elderly OC patients. Health care providers and patients should observe that hospital resource utilization may depend on hospital attributes as well as patient attributes. These analytical results should be applicable to similar elderly populations in other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodmer M, Brauchli YB, Krähenbühl S et al (2009) Statin use and risk of gallstone disease followed by cholecystectomy. JAMA 302:2001–2007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan M, Qadri SJ, Nazir SS (2010) Use of rigid nephroscope for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration—a single-center experience. World J Surg 34:784–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mancero JM, D’Albuquerque LA, Gonzalez AM et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis: a case–control study. World J Surg 32:267–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Massarweh NN, Legner VJ, Symons RG et al (2010) Impact of advancing age on abdominal surgical outcomes. Arch Surg 144:1108–1114

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaya IO, Ozkardes A, Ozdemir F et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly people: does advanced age present any risk for conversion? J Am Geriatr Soc 56:962–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwon AH, Matsui Y (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 years and over. World J Surg 30:1204–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang HC, Chi C, Liu CM (2004) Impact of the case payment reimbursement method on the utilization and costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Health Policy 67:195–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng JF et al (2008) Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 32:2230–2236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:178–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang E, Abrahamowicz M, Ferland D et al (2002) Comparison of the responsiveness of lupus disease activity measures to changes in systemic lupus erythematosus activity relevant to patients and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol 55:488–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Csikesz NG, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis. Surgery 144:283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C et al (2010) Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:141–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MT, Hsi SC, Hu P et al (2007) Biliopleural fistula: a rare complication of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. World J Gastroenterol 13(23):3268–3270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R et al (2002) A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:334–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D et al (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ann Surg 237:358–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Kercher KW et al (2005) Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93, 578 patients. Surg Endosc 19:767–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Polychronidis A, Botaitis S, Tsaroucha A et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 17:309–313

    Google Scholar 

  18. Psaila J, Agrawal S, Fountain U et al (2008) Day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors influencing same-day discharge. World J Surg 32:76–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Healthcare Administration, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Hon-Yi Shi & King-Teh Lee

  2. Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    King-Teh Lee

  3. Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan

    Yih-Huei Uen & Chong-Chi Chiu

  4. Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liou Ying Campus, 100-Shih-Chun 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Chong-Chi Chiu & Hao-Hsien Lee

Authors
  1. Hon-Yi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. King-Teh Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yih-Huei Uen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chong-Chi Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hao-Hsien Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao-Hsien Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, HY., Lee, KT., Uen, YH. et al. Changing Approaches to Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients: A 10-Year Retrospective Study in Taiwan. World J Surg 34, 2922–2931 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0781-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0781-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation