Skip to main content

Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy With and Without Laparoscopic Conditioning of the Gastric Conduit

World Journal of Surgery volume 34, pages 738–743 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leakage is still the major surgical complication following transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy (Ivor-Lewis procedure). Modifications of this standard procedure aim to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis of a 12-year period, 419 patients who had an Ivor-Lewis (IL) procedure for esophageal carcinoma were included. Due to modifications of the standard procedure, two different groups were compared with respect to their mortality and anastomotic leakage rate. In 181 patients (43.1%), esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction was performed as a one-stage procedure (classical IL group). Two hundred thirty-eight patients (56.9%) underwent a modified IL procedure that included minimally invasive gastric mobilization and a two-stage operation following ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit.

Results

The hospital mortality rate was lower in the modified IL group without statistical significance (2.9 vs. 6.1%). Thirty-five anastomotic leaks were diagnosed postoperatively, 17 in the classical IL group (9.4%) and 18 in the modified IL group (7.6%). The rate of late leakages (after the 10th postoperative day) was higher in the modified IL group. Septic complications and mortality following anastomotic leakage were less frequent in the modified IL group. Leaks in the classical IL group predominantly required rethoracotomy, whereas leaks of the modified IL group were sufficiently treated with endoscopic stenting.

Conclusions

Surgical modifications of the classical IL procedure, including a minimally invasive approach and ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit, seem to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, due to the retrospective design of this study, the impact of other factors influencing the outcome cannot be ruled out.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Hulscher JBF, Tijssen JGP, Obertop H et al (2001) Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a metaanalysis. Ann Thorac Surg 72:306–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Omloo JMT, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JBF et al (2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus. Five year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 246:992–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR (2008) The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg 248:549–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boone J, Livestro DP, Elias SG (2009) International survey on esophageal cancer: part I surgical techniques. Dis Esophagus 22:195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y et al (2000) Improvements in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 232:225–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H (2004) Improved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of sqamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection. Ann Surg 239:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I (2004) Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en-bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1177–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Law S, Wong KH, Kwok KF et al (2004) Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 240:791–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcome in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orringer MB, Marshal B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experiments and refinements. Ann Surg 230:394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schilling MK, Radaelli C, Maurer C et al (1996) Gastric microcirculatory changes during gastric tube formation: assessment with Laser Doppler flowmetry. J Surg Res 62:125–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schröder W, Stippel D, Beckurts KTE et al (2001) Intraoperative changes of mucosal pCO2 during gastric tube formation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:324–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schröder W, Beckurts KTE, Stähler D (2002) Microcirculatory changes associated with gastric tube formation in the pig. Eur Surg Res 34:411–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schilling M, Redaelli C, Zbaeren P et al (1997) First clinical experience with the fundus rotation gastroplasty as a substitute for the esophagus. Br J Surg 84:126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murakami M, Sugiyama A, Ikegami T et al (1999) Additional microvascular anastomosis in reconstruction after total esophagectomy for cervicoesophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg 178:263–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buise M, van Bommel J, Jahn A et al (2006) Intravenous nitroglycerin does not preserve gastric microcirculation during gastric tube reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 10:131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Urschel JD, Antkowiak JG, Delacure MD et al (1997) Ischemic conditioning (delay phenomenon) improves esophagogastric anastomotic wound healing in the rat. J Surg Oncol 66:254–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reavis KM, Chang EY, Hunter JG et al (2005) Utilization of the delay phenomenon improves blood flow and reduces collagen deposition in esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Surg 241:736–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hölscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C et al (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245:241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider PM, Baldus SE, Metzger R et al (2005) Histomorphologic tumour regression and lymph node metastasis determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response prediction. Ann Surg 242:684–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hölscher AH, Schröder W, Bollschweiler E et al (2003) How safe is high intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy? Chirurg 74:726–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM et al (2007) Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pech O, Behrens A, May A et al (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gut 57:1200–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C et al (2009) Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus 22:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludeman R et al (2004) Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 91:943–947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown L, Devesa S, Chow W (2008) Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1184–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schröder W, Baldus S, Mönig S et al (2002) Lymph node staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: histomorphological analysis. World J Surg 26:584–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Enestvedt CK, Hosack L, Winn SR et al (2008) VEGF gene therapy augments localized angiogenesis and promotes anastomotic wound healing: a pilot study in a clinically relevant animal model. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1762–1777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schröder W, Stippel D, Gutschow C et al (2004) Postoperative recovery of microcirculation after gastric tube formation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lamas S, Azuara D, de Oca J et al (2008) Time course of necrosis/apoptosis and neovascularization during experimental gastric conditioning. Dis Esophagus 21:370–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    Wolfgang Schröder, Arnulf H. Hölscher, Marc Bludau, Daniel Vallböhmer, Elfriede Bollschweiler & Christian Gutschow

Authors
  1. Wolfgang Schröder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arnulf H. Hölscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Bludau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Vallböhmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elfriede Bollschweiler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Gutschow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Schröder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schröder, W., Hölscher, A.H., Bludau, M. et al. Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy With and Without Laparoscopic Conditioning of the Gastric Conduit. World J Surg 34, 738–743 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0403-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0403-x

Keywords

  • Esophageal Cancer
  • Anastomotic Leakage
  • Esophageal Carcinoma
  • Gastric Tube
  • Anastomotic Leakage Rate