Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complications Analysis with Postoperative Choledochoscopy for Residual Bile Duct Stones

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to review the experience of this department with the treatment of post-common bile duct exploration residual stones using choledochoscopy and to analyze the complications of choledochoscopy and explore effective methods of prevention.

Methods

A choledochoscope (PENTAX fibercholedochoscope and electronic choledochoscope PENTAX ECN-1530) was used. A total of 2,882 postoperative percutaneous choledochoscopy (POC) sessions were performed on 986 patients with residual bile duct stones from 1980 to 2008 (408 men, 578 women; ages range, 21–82 years). Forty-five of these had undergone laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE); the rest had open bile duct exploration. Seventy-six participants had choledochoscopy examination (for diagnosis only), and in 910 patients it was performed for both diagnosis and therapy (calculi extraction). In 68 cases, plasma shock wave lithotripsy (PSWL) was performed for larger stones before choledochoscopy extraction.

Results

The mean duration of choledochoscopy was 25 min (range, 10 min to 2 h), with a mean frequency of 2.85 times (range, 1–11). No mortalities occurred. The procedure was unsuccessful in 28 cases in which stones were not accessible because they were embedded in distal hepatic ducts or because they were in proximal ducts that were severely stenosed. Complications resulted in 13 cases and included perforated sinus, biliary peritonitis, sinus hypoplasia, destruction of the T-tube system leading to obstruction, basket incarceration, bleeding, and intestinal fistular. Choledochoscopic stone clearance was achieved in 95.5% of the cases.

Conclusions

Choledochoscopy is an important treatment option for hepatolithus. It has a high efficiency for stone extraction and fewer complications. However, it should be noted that some of its complications are potentially life-threatening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shore JM, Lippman HN (1965) A flexible choiedocboscope. Lancet I:1200–1201

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yamakawa T, Komaki F, Shikata J (1978) Experience with routine postoperative choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. World J Surg 2:379–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gocho K, Hiratsuka H (1977) Postoperative choledochofiberscopic removal of intrahepatic stones. Jpn J Surg 7:18–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berci G, Shore JM, Morgenstern L, Hamlin JA (1978) Choledochoscopy and operative fluoro-cholangiography in the prevention of retained bile duct stones. World J Surg 2:411–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gamal EM, Szabo A, Sziile E, Vors A, Metzger P, Kovacs G, Rozsabegyi J, Olah A, Rozsa L, Kiss J (2001) Percutaneous video choledochoscopic treatment of retained biliary stones via dilated T-tube tract. Surg Endosc 15:473–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gartell PC, McGinn EP (1984) Choledochoscopy: are stones missed? A controlled study. Br J Surg 71:767–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall RC, Sakiyalak P, Kim SK, Rogers LS, Webb WR (1973) Failure of operative cholangiography to prevent retained common duct stones. Am J Surg 125:51–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ker CG, Huang TJ, Sheen PC (1981) Intrahepatic stones. I. Etiological study. Taiwan I Hsueh Hui Tsa Chih 80:698–711

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. King ML, String ST (1983) Extent of choledochoscopic utilization in common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 146:322–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takada T, Yasada H, Uchiyama K (1991) Choledochoscopy during biliary surgery for reducing the risk of overlooked stones. Surg Endosc 5:192–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang MH, Yang JC, Lee SA (1980) Choledochofiberoscopy in the post-operative management of intrahepatic stones. Am J Surg 139:860–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ker CG, Sheen PC (1981) Postoperative choledochofiberscopic removal of retained intrahepatic stones. Taiwan I Hsueh Hui Tsa Chih 80:158–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizumoto R, Kire K, Ogur Y, Sato Y (1980) Pathogenesis and treatment of recurrent gallstones. J Surg Treatment (Japan) 42:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faggioni A, Bondanza G, Filanro M, Pastorino G, Bagarolo C (1985) Tratamento transcutaneo della calcolosi residua/recidiva delle vie biliari. Minerva Chir 40:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanyu F, Takata K, Nakamura A, Nakata Y, Furoshima Y, Suzuki S, Imamoto T, Ikaita U (1976) Residual biliary tract calculi. Jpn Clin Surg 31:1549–1559

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fraser I, Fossard DP (1984) The management of common bile duct calculi by endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladders in situ. Br J Surg 71:69–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lambert ME, Martin DF, Tweedle DEb’ (1988) Endoscopic removal of retained stories after biliary surgery. Br J Surg 75:896–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen MF, Chou FF, Wang CS, Jan YI (1982) Experience with and complications of post-operative choledochofiberoscopy for retained biliary stones. Acta Chir Scand 148:503–509

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Q-L, Wang Q-W, Miao X-Y, Li Y-G (2008) A technique of T-tube replacement. Chin J Gen Surg 17:165–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuo-Dong Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kong, J., Wu, SD., Xian, GZ. et al. Complications Analysis with Postoperative Choledochoscopy for Residual Bile Duct Stones. World J Surg 34, 574–580 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0352-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0352-4

Keywords

Navigation