Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of Impact of Surgical Disease Through Economic Modeling of Cleft Lip and Palate Care

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Assessing burden of disease encompasses the prevalence of disease entities, but it is the impact that affects the populace. Similarly, optimal evaluation of intervention programs shows impact rather than simply an enumeration of services. Economic effects are a fungible measure but are difficult to assess. Modeling of economic effects was used to evaluate a cleft program in Nepal and to demonstrate impact of alleviating this subset of the surgical burden of disease.

Methods

The database of patients who underwent care at a cleft center in Katmandu in 2005 was used. Disability adjusted life years averted were calculated. Using both GNI per capita and Value of a Statistical Life, the economic value to the individuals and to society was calculated.

Results

The two methods yielded a conservative and a generous estimate of economic impact of treating cleft lip and palate. Using GNI per capita, cleft lip repair added between $856 and $6,598 to lifetime individual income. For cleft palate, this ranged from $2,293 to $17,278. Using Value of a Statistical Life, cleft lip repair added between $56,919 and $143,363, and cleft palate between $152,372 and $375,412.

Conclusions

The immense economic gain realized by an intervention addressing a small proportion of the surgical burden of disease indicates the importance of these conditions to public health and well-being. This methodology also lends itself to broader use and to further refinement as a means of evaluation of interventions. This has implications for health policy and for funding and resource allocation for surgical conditions in the developing world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Purchasing Power Parity considers the varying prices of goods between national economies; the Atlas method of computing Gross National Income measures income in terms of currency equivalents, but also considers fluctuations in exchange rates. See http://www.who.int/choice/costs/ppp/en/ for more information on PPP and http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0,,contentMDK:20173256~isCURL:Y~menuPK:64133156~pagePK:64133150~piPK:64133175~theSitePK:239419,00.html for more information on economic assessment of countries.

References

  1. Debas HT, Gosselin R, McCord C, Thind A (2006) Surgery. In: Jamison D (ed) Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1245–1259

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ozgediz D, Jamison D, Cherian M, McQueen K (2008) The burden of surgical conditions and access to surgical care in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 86:646–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiser TG et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dempsey M (1947) Decline in tuberculosis: the death rate fails to tell the entire story. Am Rev Tuberculosis 56:157-164; cited in: Mathers CD, Vos T, Lopez AD, Salomon J, Ezzati M (eds) (2001) National Burden of Disease Studies: a practical guide. Edition 2.0. Global Program on Evidence for Health Policy. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murray CJL, Frenk J (2008) Health metrics and evaluation: strengthening the science. Lancet 371:1191–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murray CJL, Lopez AD, Jamison DT (1994) The global burden of disease in 1990: summary results, sensitivity analysis and future directions. Bull World Health Organ 72:445–459

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1997) Global mortality, disability and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study. Lancet 349:1436–1442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (eds) (1996) The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Harvard University Press on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL (2006) Global burden of disease and risk factors. Oxford University Press and The World Bank

  10. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL (2006) Global burden of disease and risk factors: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367:1747–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study Operations Manual Final Draft January 31, 2008. http://www.globalburden.org/GBD_Study_Operations_Manual_Jan_31_2008.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2008

  12. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL (2006) Global burden of disease and risk factors. Oxford University Press and The World Bank, p 153

  13. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1994) Quantifying disability: data, methods and results. Bull World Health Organ 72:481–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murray CJL (1994) Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull World Health Organ 72:425–445

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anand S, Hanson K (1997) Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. J Health Econ 16:685–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams A (1999) Calculating the global burden of disease: time for a strategic reappraisal? Health Econ 8:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (2000) Progress and directions in refining the global burden of disease approach: a response to Williams. Health Econ 9:69–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shanmugan KR (2001) Self-selection bias in the estimates of compensating differentials for job risks in India. J Risk Uncertain 22:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bloom D, Canning D, Sevilla J (2004) The effect of health on economic growth: a production function approach. World Development 32(1):1. (Cited in Bloom D, Canning D, Weston M, The value of vaccination. World Economics 6:15–39)

  20. Becker GS, Phillipson TJ, Soares RR (2005) The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. NBER Working Paper No. 9765

  21. Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106:407–443 (cited in Bils and Klenow)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bils M, Klenow PJ (2000) Does schooling cause growth? Am Econ Rev 90:1160–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Acemoglu D, Angrist J (1999) How large are the social returns to education? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws, Working paper 7444, National Bureau of Economic Research; http://www.nber.org/papers/w7444

  24. Ashraf QH, Lester A, Weil DN (2008) When does improving health raise GDP? Presented at Harvard School of Public Health, February 12, 2007; published as Ashraf QH, Lester A, Weil DN (2008) When does improving health raise GDP? NBER Working Paper W14449. http://www.org/papers/w14449

  25. Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Q J Econ 114:83–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thaler R, Rosen S (1975) The value of saving a life: evidence from the labor market. In: Terlekyj N (ed) Household production and consumption. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 265–298

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moore MJ, Viscusi WK (1998) The quantity-adjusted value of life. Econ Inq 26:369–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertain 27:5–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aldy JE, Viscusi WK (2007) Age differences in the value of statistical life: revealed preference evidence. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 07-05

  30. Mathers CD, Salomon JA, Ezzati M (2006) Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for burden of disease and risk factor estimates. In: Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M et al (eds) Global burden of disease and risk factors. Oxford University Press and The World Bank, p 417

  31. Edejer TT, Evans D, Lowe J (2002) WHR p 108. http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/whr02_en.pdf

  32. WHO (2001) Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development. In: Sachs JD (ed) Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. World Health Organization, p 32

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the contributions to this work of Dr. Shankar Man Rai and Dr. Kiran Nakarmi of the Interplast Surgical Outreach Program at Katmandu Model Hospital, Katmandu, Nepal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Scott Corlew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corlew, D.S. Estimation of Impact of Surgical Disease Through Economic Modeling of Cleft Lip and Palate Care. World J Surg 34, 391–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0198-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0198-9

Keywords

Navigation