Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality in Oncologic Gastric Surgery with the Application of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and O-POSSUM

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Evaluation of surgical results observed in oncologic gastric surgery with reference to estimation of risks through POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity), P-POSSUM (Portsmouth POSSUM), and O-POSSUM (regression model based on the POSSUM and P-POSSUM, especially designed for gastric and esophagus surgery).

Methods

A prospective follow-up of a cohort of 106 consecutive patients, gastrectomized because of gastric cancer. The variables studied were: age, sex, technical surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, the Charlson comorbidity index, morbidity, and mortality.

Results

From January 2004 to April 2008, 131 patients were operated on for gastric neoplasia. Of these, 28 patients were excluded: 5 because of nonstandard gastrectomy, 17 because of staging laparoscopy or unresectable cancer after laparotomy, and 3 because of palliative gastroenteroanastomosis; 106 patients were included. We performed 38 total gastrectomies, 65 distal gastrectomies, 2 esophagogastrectomies, and 1 proximal gastrectomy. The mean age was 68 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12.1; range, 34–85 years). Associated comorbidity (Charlson) was 5.4 (SD = 2.7; range, 2–16); ASA 1 at 1.9%; ASA 2 at 36.8%; ASA 3 at 43.4%; and ASA 4 at 17.9%. Expected morbidity, according to POSSUM was 46.7%; observed morbidity was 50.5%. Morbidity ratio observed/expected was 1.08. Expected mortality, according to POSSUM = 13%, according to P-POSSUM = 4.9%, and according to O-POSSUM = 12.1%. Observed mortality was 7.8%. Mortality ratio observed/expected according to POSSUM, P-POSSUM, O-POSSUM was 0.6, 1.6, and 0.6, respectively. Morbidity results were within the confidence interval of the POSSUM estimation. Our results show lower mortality than the POSSUM and the O-POSSUM estimation (P < 0.001) and higher mortality regarding P-POSSUM estimation (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The control systems of risk allow us continuous evaluation of our results and objective comparison to other teams. Compared with the POSSUM scoring systems, our series showed quality improvement (morbidity and mortality) over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones HJ, de Cossart L (1999) Risk scoring in surgical patients. Br J Surg 86:149–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG (1996) An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 83:812–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tekkis PP, McCulloch P, Poloniecki JD, Prytherch DR, Kessaris N, Steger AC (2004) Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUM. Br J Surg 91:288–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siewert JR, Boucher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD, for German Gastric Carcinoma Group (1998) Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten years results of the German gastric cancer study. Ann Surg 228:449–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis P (2003) Mortality and morbidity in gastroesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ 327:1192–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sagar PM, Hartley MN, MacFie J, Taylor BA, Copeland GP (1996) Comparison of individual surgeon’s performance. Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system. Dis Colon Rectum 39:654–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tekkis PP, Kessaris N, Kocher HM, Poloniecki JD, Lyttle J, Windsor AC (2003) Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 90:340–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bollschweiler E, Lubke T, Monig S, Holscher A (2005) Evaluation of POSSUM scoring system in patients with gastric cancer undergoing D2-gastrectomy. BMC Surg 5:8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wakabayashi H, Sano T, Yachida S, Okano K, Izuishi K, Suzuki Y (2007) Validation of risk assessment scoring systems for an audit of elective surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in elderly patients. Int J Surg 5:323–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Otsuka Y, Kunisaki C, Ono H et al (2007) Modified POSSUM to predict postoperative morbidity following gastrectomy. Hepato-Gastroenterology 54:1142–1145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gocmen E, Koc M, Tez M, Keskek M, Kilic M, Ertan T (2004) Evaluation of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM scores in patients with gastric cancer undergoing resection. Hepato-Gastroenterology 51:1864–1866

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neary WD, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ (2003) The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM). Br J Surg 90:157–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis Luna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luna, A., Rebasa, P., Navarro, S. et al. An Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality in Oncologic Gastric Surgery with the Application of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and O-POSSUM. World J Surg 33, 1889–1894 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0118-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0118-z

Keywords

Navigation