Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Experience of Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagogastric Resection

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A minimally invasive approach to esophagogastric cancer resection offers an attractive alternative to traditional open surgery; however, concerns regarding feasibility, safety, cost, and outcomes have restricted widespread acceptance of these procedures. This study outlines our comparative experiences of both open and minimally invasive esophagectomy over a 4-year period.

Methods

Surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared between 30 consecutive patients who underwent open (Ivor Lewis) transthoracic esophagectomy (TTO) between January 2002 and December 2003 and 50 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) from January 2004 to July 2006.

Results

Inpatient mortality and overall surgical morbidity were identical for each cohort (TTO versus MIO: mortality 3% versus 2%; morbidity 50% versus 48%). Pulmonary-related complications were higher in the open series (23% versus 8%; p = 0.05). The incidence of gastric-conduit-related complications was similar between the two cohorts (13% versus 18%; p = 0.52). Survival at 1 and 2 years was 86% and 58% in the TTO group and 94% and 74% in the MIO group. No significant difference in calculated cost was observed (£7,017 versus £7,885).

Conclusions

Transition from open to minimally invasive techniques of esophagogastric resection for cancer is possible without compromising patient safety or incurring excessive financial expenses, and the minimally invasive procedure results in similar or potentially better outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D et al (2008) Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 95:602–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C et al (1991) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:138–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group (2002) Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemothearpy in oesophageal cancer. Lancet 359:1727–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L et al (1998) Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 65:814–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. EcoHealth 17:515–519

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM (2002) Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 194:285–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM et al (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135:920–925

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J et al (2000) A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 88:1781–1787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zieren HU, Jacobi CA, Zieren J et al (1996) Quality of life following resection of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 83:1772–1775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahjehan Wajed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parameswaran, R., Veeramootoo, D., Krishnadas, R. et al. Comparative Experience of Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagogastric Resection. World J Surg 33, 1868–1875 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0116-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0116-1

Keywords

Navigation