Skip to main content

Prospective Study of Routine Day-Case Laparoscopic Modified Lind Partial Fundoplication

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of performing day-case laparoscopic modified Lind fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease on a routine basis and to determine possible implications for health care costs to the hospital.

Methods

All patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication between November 2005 and November 2007 under the care of one surgeon were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II with adequate home support. The surgical procedure was laparoscopic modified Lind fundoplication in all the cases. Patients were reviewed in the clinic at 6 weeks and were subsequently assessed through a structured postal questionnaire at a median of 1 year.

Results

Over the 25-month period, a total of 130 laparoscopic modified Lind fundoplications were performed, of which 103 (79.2%) met the inclusion criteria for day-case surgery. The patients were 16 to 75 years of age. Ninety (87.4%) were discharged on the same day as planned, and 11 patients were admitted overnight because of nausea. At clinic follow-up at a median of 6 weeks all patients expressed satisfaction and were reflux free. There was a significant reduction of mean modified Visick score and visual analog scale for reflux at a median of 1 year after surgery.

Conclusions

Routine day-case laparoscopic modified Lind fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease is safe and well tolerated, with high levels of patient satisfaction and reduced costs to the hospital. Patients with ASA grade >2 and redo antireflux surgery should not be considered for day-case surgery. Hospital readmission was required in less than 3% of patients after discharge home, but those readmissions were not related to early discharge on the same day of surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Milford MA, Paluch TA (1997) Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 11:1150–1152

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Trondsen E, Mjaland O, Raeder J et al (2000) Day-case laparoscopic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 87:1708–1711

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ray S (2003) Result of 310 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication as hospital outpatients at a freestanding surgery center. Surg Endosc 17:378–380

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bailey ME, Garrett WV, Nisar A et al (2003) Day-case laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 90:560–562

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Skattum J, Edwin B, Trondsen E et al (2004) Out-patient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs. Surg Endosc 18:796–801

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Victorzon M, Tolonen P, Vuorialho T (2006) Laparoscopic floppy Nissen fundoplication for gastrooesophageal reflux disease is feasible as a day-case procedure. Scand J Surg 95:162–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mariette C, Piessen G, Balon JM et al (2007) The safety of the same-day discharge for selected patients after laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 194:279–282

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lind JF, Burns CM, MacDougall JT (1965) “Physiological” repair for hiatus hernia—manometric study. Arch Surg 91:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Visick AH (1948) A study of the failures after gastrectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 3:266–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Department of Health (2002) Day surgery: operational guide. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cohn JC, Klingler PJ, Hinder RA (1997) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication as an ambulatory surgery center procedure. Today’s Surg Nurse 19:27–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Narain PK, Moss JM, DeMaria EJ (2000) Feasibility of 23-hour hospitalization after laparoscopic fundoplication. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 10:5–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Finley CR, McKernan JB (2001) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery at an outpatient surgery center. Surg Endosc 15:823–826

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Randel GI, Levy L, Kothary SP et al (1992) Propofol versus thiamylal-enflurane anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy. J Clin Anesth 4:185–189

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ding Y, Fredman B, White PF (1993) Recovery following outpatient anesthesia: use of enflurane versus propofol. J Clin Anesth 5:447–450

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Snellen FT, Vanacker B, Van Aken H (1993) Propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopental sodium-isoflurane-nitrous oxide for strabismus surgery in children. J Clin Anesth 5:37–41

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M et al (1999) Simplified risks score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anaesthesiology 91:693–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M et al (2004) A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 350:2441–2451

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ng R, Mullin EJ, Maddern GJ (2005) Systematic review of day-case laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Aust N Z J Surg 75:160–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Khan MA, Smythe A, Globe J et al (2009) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Nissen versus Lind fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:269–275

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Watson DI, Jamieson GG (1998) Antireflux surgery in the laparoscopic era. Br J Surg 85:1173–1184

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Agrawal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agrawal, S., Shapey, I., Peacock, A. et al. Prospective Study of Routine Day-Case Laparoscopic Modified Lind Partial Fundoplication. World J Surg 33, 1229–1234 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0026-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • Motion Sickness
  • Short Gastric Vessel
  • Partial Fundoplication
  • Codeine Phosphate