Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multimodal Perioperative Rehabilitation for Colonic Surgery in the Elderly

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Traditional perioperative care for colonic surgery in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to that of younger patients. Although multimodal perioperative rehabilitation has evolved as a valid concept to improve postoperative outcome, its use has not yet been established for colonic surgery in the elderly.

Methods

Data from 24 German hospitals performing multimodal perioperative rehabilitation as the standard perioperative care for elderly patients who have undergone elective colonic resection was assessed in a prospective multicenter study between April 2005 and April 2007.

Results

A total of 742 patients aged ≥70 were examined. Overall compliance with the multimodal care protocol decreased with increasing age. Although laparoscopic colonic surgery was performed in 39.1% of the septuagenarians, the number decreased to 25.1% in the very old patients. The overall complication rate was 22.9% in the septuagenarians (18.1% surgical and 11.6% general complications) and increased in the very old patients to 38.4% (28.0% and 23.6%, respectively) The overall mortality rate was 1.0% and showed no age-specific variations.

Conclusions

Although the overall morbidity did increase with age, it was still less when compared to that of historical groups with traditional care. Therefore, multimodal perioperative rehabilitation should be recommended for the elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bardram L, Funch P, Jensen P et al (1995) Recovery after laparoscopic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet 345:763–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kehlet H, Büchler MW, Beart RW et al (2006) Care after colonic operation—is it evidenced based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg 202:45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multi-modal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery and challenges for postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwenk W, Raue W, Haase O et al (2004) “Fast-track” colonic surgery: first experience with a clinical procedure for accelerating postoperative recovery. Chirurg 75:508–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wind J, Poll SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Simmonds PD, Best L, George S et al (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet 356:968–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steward BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Udelnow A, Leinung S, Schreiter D et al (2005) Impact of age on in-hospital mortality of surgical patients in a German university hospital. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 41:281–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ et al (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kehlet H (2006) Future perspectives and research initiatives in fast-track surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:495–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephen AE, Berger DL (2003) Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colonic resection. Surgery 133:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kehlet H, Kennedy RH (2006) Laparoscopic colonic surgery: mission accomplished or work in progress? Colorectal Dis 8:514–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasenberg T, Rittler P, Post S et al (2007) A survey of perioperative therapy for elective colon resection in Germany 2006. Chirurg 9:818–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2005) The impact of the risc factor “age” on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management. World J Surg 29:1013–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gretschel S, Estevez-Schwarz L, Hunerbein M et al (2006) Gastric cancer surgery in elderly patients. World J Surg 30:1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saidi RF, Bell JL, Dudrick PS (2004) Surgical resection for gastric cancer in elderly patients: is there a difference in outcome? J Surg Res 118:15–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeh CN, Lee WC, Jeng LB et al (2004) Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients. Hepatogastroenterology 51:219–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop W et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ceulemans R, Al-Ahdab N, Leroy J et al (2004) Safe laparoscopic surgery in the elderly. Am J Surg 187:323–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng B, Zheng MH, Mao ZH et al (2006) Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:191–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Basse L, Jacobsen DH, Bardram L et al (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomised, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DiFronzo LA, Yamin N, Patel K et al (2003) Benefits of early feeding and early hospital discharge in elderly patients undergoing open colon resection. J Am Coll Surg 197:747–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Badram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H (2000) Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 87:1540–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data collection within the Quality Assurance Program “Fast-track” Colon II was funded (in alphabetical order) by: Astra Zeneca Germany, Fresenius Germany, Karl Storz Endoskope Germany, Pfizer Germany, Pfrimmer/Nutricia Germany, and Tyco Healthcare Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Diakoniekrankenhaus Mannheim, Speyerer Strasse 91–93, 68163, Mannheim, Germany

    B. Rumstadt

  2. Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Visceral-, Gefäß-, und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Charité, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany

    N. Guenther & W. Schwenk

  3. Chirurgische Klinik, Krankenhaus Bad Soden, Kliniken des Main-Taunus-Kreises GmbH, Bad Soden, Germany

    P. Wendling

  4. Chirurgische Klinik I Allgemein-, Viszeral-, und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany

    R. Engemann

  5. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Nuernberg, Nuernberg, Germany

    C. T. Germer

  6. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH Standort III Kirchheimbolanden, Kirchheimbolanden, Germany

    M. Schmid

  7. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Sankt-Marien Hospital, Mülheim/Ruhr, Germany

    K. Kipfmueller

  8. Klinik für Chirurgie und Zentrum für Minimal Invasive Chirurgie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany

    M. K. Walz

Authors
  1. B. Rumstadt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Guenther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Wendling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Engemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. T. Germer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. K. Kipfmueller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. K. Walz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. W. Schwenk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Rumstadt.

Additional information

This study is conducted for “Fast-track Colon II” (FTCII) Quality Assurance Group. All participating centers are listed at the end of the article.

Appendix

Appendix

The following surgeons and hospitals participated in the “Fast-track”-Colon II registry by providing at least one patient.

P. Wendling, Kliniken des Main-Taunus-Kreises GmbH, Krankenhaus Bad Soden; R. Engemann, Klinikum Aschaffenburg; M. Schmid, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH Standort III Kirchheimbolanden; W. Probst, Ammerland Klinik GmbH, Westerstede; K. Kipfmüller, Sankt-Marien Hospital, Mühlheim an der Ruhr; J.M. Müller Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin; B. Rumstadt, Diakoniekrankenhaus, Mannheim; M.K. Walz, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; K. Nagel, Marienhospital, Aachen; J. Gönninger, Klinikum Minden; K. Schönleben, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen; B. Vetter, St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Lörrach; H.P. Meyer, Hunsrück Klinik Kreuznacher Diakonie, Simmern; B. Rehnisch, Klinikum des Landkreises Löbau-Zittau gGmbH, Zittau; H.W. Krawzak, Klinikum Niederberg, Velbert ; C.T. Germer, Klinikum Nürnberg; A. Hirner, Universitätsklinikum Bonn; M. Varney, Städtisches Klinikum Gütersloh; D. Ockert, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Trier; V. Paolucci, Ketteler Krankenhaus, Offenbach; M. Kahle, St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Bad Kissingen; A. Trupka, Klinikum Starnberg; K. Zarras, St. Vinzenz-Hospital Düsseldorf; W. Timmermann, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Hagen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rumstadt, B., Guenther, N., Wendling, P. et al. Multimodal Perioperative Rehabilitation for Colonic Surgery in the Elderly. World J Surg 33, 1757–1763 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0018-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0018-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation