Skip to main content
Log in

Modified Technique of Pancreaticojejunal Anastomosis with Invagination Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Cohort Study

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Leakage from pancreatic anastomoses remains the single most important morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy and contributes to prolonged hospitalization and mortality. This observational cohort study reported the surgical outcome of a modified invagination technique of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Methods

Between December 2001 and December 2007, a total of 52 consecutive patients underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign or malignant pathologies of the pancreas or the periampullary region in a tertiary referral center. All patients underwent our modified invagination technique of pancreaticojejunostomy regardless of the characteristics of the pancreatic stump. Data were collected prospectively.

Results

The mean hospital stay was 12.6 ± 3.2 days. The incidence of overall surgical complications was 9.6%. No patient developed pancreatic fistula. One patient (1.9%) died of respiratory failure on postoperative day 7.

Conclusions

We reported our pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis technique with a pancreatic fistula rate of 0% and low intra-abdominal complication rate. The favorable results of this technique warrant further investigation in large prospective cohort studies and prospective randomized controlled studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP (2004) Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 91:1410–1427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stojadinovic A, Brooks A, Hoos A, Jaques DP, Conlon KC, Brennan MF et al (2003) An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 196:954–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeng Q, Zhang Q, Han S, Yu Z, Zheng M, Zhou M, Bai J, Jin R (2008) Efficacy of somatostatin and its analogues in prevention of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pancreas 36:18–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shrikhande SV, Qureshi SS, Rajneesh N, Shukla PJ (2005) Pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy: do we need further studies? World J Surg 29:1642–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Choti MA (2000) Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 232:419–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Müller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Büchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Doig C, Dort J, Vollmer CM Jr, Dixon E (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:929–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V, Di Carlo V, Hop WC, Zerbi A, Balzano G, Jeekel H (2002) Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S Fourtanier G, Muscari F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Radovanowic A, Fagniez PL, and the French Associations for Research in Surgery (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–729

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA, Salvia R, Pederzoli P (2003) Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 134:766–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, Wong J (2007) External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:425–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang DC, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Sonnenday CJ, Wolfgang CL, Marohn MR, Yeo CJ (2006) Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1280–1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng SY, Mou YP, Liu YB, Su Y, Peng CH, Cai XJ, Wu YL, Zhou LH (2003) Binding pancreaticojejunostomy: 150 consecutive cases without leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 7:898–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Liu YB, Li JT (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH (1995) Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 221:635–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang ML, Zhang Z, Jiang Y et al (2001) A study on the process of fusion of the pancreatoenterostomy in pancreatoduodenectomy. J Surg Concepts Prac 6:313–315

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strasberg SM, McNevin MS (1998) Results of a technique of pancreaticojejunostomy that optimizes blood supply to the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg 187:591–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA, Green DW, Jones KL, Ehlers JP, Linehan D (2002) Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg 194:746–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Yee Lau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Hw., Lai, E.C.H., Su, Sy. et al. Modified Technique of Pancreaticojejunal Anastomosis with Invagination Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Cohort Study. World J Surg 32, 2695–2700 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9760-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9760-0

Keywords

Navigation