Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors Influencing Surgical Career Choices and Advancement in Ireland and Britain

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the factors that influence the advancement and the career choices of doctors and medical students.

Methods

Using the combined databases of the iformix and surgent websites, 450 doctors and medical students were invited to complete an internet-based survey. Surgent (http://www.surgent.ie) and iformix (http://www.iformix.com) are two free internet services administered by the authors. Surgent is a medical educational website, while iformix facilitates the online submission of abstracts to surgical and medical conferences across Britain and Ireland. The combined database of these two websites is approximately 4500 entries. Four hundred and fifty users represented a 10% sample based on an expected 40%-45% response rate. This was anticipated to yield between 180 and 202 respondents, statistically sufficient to analyze the data. A detailed Likert scale assessed the importance of “academic,” “clinical,” and “lifestyle” factors in determining career choice and progression. Analysis included descriptive statistics and inferential testing.

Results

Fifty percent (N = 222) of surveys were returned; 142 men and 78 women. Thirty-seven percent of respondents were Irish, 28% British, and 35% non-European. Fifteen percent were undergraduates, 4% interns, 12% had 2-4 years of clinical experience, while 69% had completed more than 4 years. Fifty-six percent had decided upon a career in general surgery. Overall, the most important factors for career choice were intellectual challenge (95%), academic opportunities (61%), and research opportunities(54%). Doctors with more than 4 years of experience deemed duration of training (p = 0.002), lifestyle during training (p = 0.02), and stress (0.005) as less important factors when considering career choice. Correlation analyses demonstrated that prestige (p = 0.002), patient relationships (p = 0.006), and advice from friends or family (p = 0.01) were more important influencing factors for interns. In terms of career advancement, 66% of non-Europeans considered family contacts important as opposed to 20% of British and 45% of Irish doctors (p < 0.001). In addition, 47% of females felt gender was important for career advancement as opposed to 31% of males (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Academic and clinical factors play an important role in career choice. However, it is clear that lifestyle factors predominate in determining an individual’s career decisions in surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Council Directive concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1993) Ref Type: Unenacted Bill/Resolution

  2. Calman, Sir Kenneth (1993) Review of Basic Medical Education in Scotland. Ref Type: Unenacted Bill/Resolution

  3. Buttimer, Dr. Jane (2006) Preparing Ireland’s Doctors to Meet the Health Needs of the 21st Century. Department of Health and Children. Ref Type: Report

  4. Morris-Stiff GJ, Sarasin S, Edwards P, et al. (2005) The European Working Time Directive: One for all and all for one? Surgery 137(3):293–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shabbir M, Amoroso P, Kirby RS (2005) The European working-time directive: one step forward, two steps back. BJU Int 95(6):727–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas NJ (2005) Sleep, performance and the European Working Time Directive. Clin Med 5(2):95–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lloyd DA (2005) Tomorrow’s surgeon—who cares for the patient? The impact of the European working time directive. J Pediatr Surg 40(1):10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. White MC, Walker IA, Jackson E, et al. (2005) Impact of the European Working Time Directive on the training of paediatric anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 60(9):870–873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott-Coombes D (2002) European working time directive for doctors in training. Reduction in juniors’ hours abolishes concept of continuity of care. BMJ 324(7339):736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan YC (2002) European working time directive for doctors in training. Profession needs to modernise surgical training. BMJ 324(7339):736–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke D (2002) Making the European Working Time Directive a reality. BMJ 325(7362):S66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Catto G (2002) Education and training within the European Working Time Directive. BMJ 325(7362):S69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sprangers F (2002) The Dutch experience of implementing the European Working Time Directive. BMJ 325(7362):S71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bland KI, Isaacs G (2002) Contemporary trends in student selection of medical specialties: the potential impact on general surgery. Arch Surg 137(3):259–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cofer JB, Biderman MD, Lewis PL, et al. (2001) Is the quality of surgical residency applicants deteriorating? Am J Surg 181(1):44–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Azizzadeh A, McCollum CH, Miller CC III, et al. (2003) Factors influencing career choice among medical students interested in surgery. Curr Surg 60(2):210–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marschall JG, Karimuddin AA (2003) Decline in popularity of general surgery as a career choice in North America: review of postgraduate residency training selection in Canada, 1996–2001. World J Surg 27(3):249–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Herrin JK, Lewis BJ, Rikkers LF, et al. (2003) Medical student operative experience correlates with a match to a categorical surgical program. Am J Surg 186(2):125–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De SK, Henke PK, Ailawadi G, et al. (2004) Attending, house officer, and medical student perceptions about teaching in the third-year medical school general surgery clerkship. J Am Coll Surg 199(6):932–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Calligaro KD, Dougherty MJ, Sidawy AN, et al. (2004) Choice of vascular surgery as a specialty: survey of vascular surgery residents, general surgery chief residents, and medical students at hospitals with vascular surgery training programs. J Vasc Surg 40(5):978–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cochran A, Melby S, Neumayer LA (2005) An Internet-based survey of factors influencing medical student selection of a general surgery career. Am J Surg 189(6):742–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Erzurum VZ, Obermeyer RJ, Fecher A, et al. (2002) What influences medical students’ choice of surgical careers. Surgery 128(2):253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz RW, Simpson WG, Strodel WE, et al. (1989) Career change: in quest of a controllable lifestyle. J Surg Res 47(3):189–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller G, Bamboat ZM, Allen F, et al. (2004) Impact of mandatory resident work hour limitations on medical students’ interest in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 199(4):615–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hcpro’s Healthcare Market Place. Physician Compensation Report. Available at www.hcmarketplace.com. 2002. 12 November 2006. Ref Type: Report

  26. Evans S, Sarani B (2002) The modern medical school graduate and general surgical training: are they compatible? Arch Surg 137(3):274–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Neumayer L, Kaiser S, Anderson K, et al. (2002) Perceptions of women medical students and their influence on career choice. Am J Surg 183(2):146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mayer KL, Ho HS, Goodnight JE Jr (2001) Childbearing and child care in surgery. Arch Surg 136(6):649–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Freischlag, Dr. Julie (2004) Vascular Surgery Board of the American Surgery Board. Available at http://www.absurg.org (Fall 2004). 12 November 2006. Ref Type: Electronic Citation

  30. Association of American Colleges Faculty Roster. Available aat www.aamc.org. 2006. 12 November 2006. Ref Type: Electronic Citation

  31. Bennett NM, Nickerson KG (1992) Women in academic medicine: perceived obstacles to advancement. J Am Med Womens Assoc 47(4):115–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, et al. (1996) Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med 335(17):1282–1289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW (2003) Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA 290(9):1173–1178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Baxter N, Cohen R, McLeod R (1996) The impact of gender on the choice of surgery as a career. Am J Surg 172(4):373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Corrigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corrigan, M.A., Shields, C.J. & Redmond, H.P. Factors Influencing Surgical Career Choices and Advancement in Ireland and Britain. World J Surg 31, 1921–1929 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9175-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9175-3

Keywords

Navigation