Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subtotal Colectomy with Antiperistaltic Cecorectal Anastomosis in the Treatment of Slow-transit Constipation: Long-term Impact on Quality of Life

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (SCCA) in the treatment of slow-transit constipation, not just in terms of symptom resolution but also the overall impact on patients’ quality of life.

Methods

Between 1991 and 2005, 43 patients underwent SCCA at our institution, 22 for slow-transit constipation (STC) and 21 for other types of colic diffuse disease (non-slow-transit constipation: NSTC), the latter being considered controls. A total of 29 patients (17 affected by STC) were administered a 50-item telephonic questionnaire, including the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Wexner constipation and incontinence scale (WC, WI), and individual willingness to repeat the procedure. Questionnaire data and other parameters such as age, sex, length of follow-up, complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed and compared, in order to evaluate possible correlations between the parameters and their related impact on quality of life, procedural effectiveness in terms of symptomatic regression, qualitative differences related to pathology (constipation versus non-constipation), and surgical approach (laparotomy versus video-laparo-assisted procedure).

Results

There were no procedure-related deaths in this series (mortality: 0%); however, we found two complications in the STC group (9.1%), one requiring reoperation. The GIQLI mean score for the STC group was 115.5 ± 20.5 (mean score for healthy people 125.8 ± 13), and the WC mean score passed from a preoperative value of 20.3 to a postoperative value of 2.6. Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between GIQLI and urgency and abdominal pain, and abdominal pain correlated significantly with pathology (STC). A high number of patients (88.2% in STC) expressed a willingness to repeat the procedure given the same preoperative conditions.

Conclusions

Comparing our results to those of the most homogeneous literature data, SCCA does not appear to be inferior to subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in terms of therapeutic effectiveness, postoperative mortality and morbidity, or overall impact on quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lane WA. (1908) The results of operative treatment of chronic constipation. Br Med J 1:126–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fasth S, Hedlund H, Svaninger G, et al. (1983) Functional results after subtotal colectomy and caeco-rectal anastomosis. Acta Chir Scand 149:623–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamm MA, Hawley PR, Lennard-Jones JE. (1988) Outcome of colectomy for severe idiopathic constipation. Gut 29:969–973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshioka K, Keighley MRB. (1989) Clinical results of colectomy for severe constipation. Br J Surg 76:600–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyam DC, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, et al. (1997) Long term result of surgery for chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 40:273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Knowles CH, Scott M, Lunniss PJ. (1999) Outcome of colectomy for slow transit constipation. Ann Surg 230:627–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Athanasakis H, Tsiaoussis J, Vassilakis JS, et al. (2001) Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy for slow transit constipation. Surg Endosc 15:1090–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarli L, Costi R, Sarli D, et al. (2001) Pilot study of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for the treatment of chronic slow-transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1514–1520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mollen RM, Kuijpers HC, Claassen AT. (2001) Colectomy for slow-transit constipation: preoperative functional evaluation is important but not a guarantee for a successful outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 44:577–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pikarsky AJ, Singh JJ, Weiss EG, et al. (2001) Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing colectomy for colonic inertia. Dis Colon Rectum 44:179–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundin E, Karlbom U, Pahlman L, et al. (2002) Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation. Br J Surg 89:1270–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. FitzHarris GP, Garcia-Aguilar J, Parker SC, et al. (2003) Quality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation: both quality and quantity count. Dis Colon Rectum 46:433–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glia A, Akerlund JE, Lindberg G. (2004) Outcome of colectomy for slow-transit constipation in relation to presence of small-bowel dysmotility. Dis Colon Rectum 47:96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Devroede G, Girard G, Bouchoucha M, et al. (1989) Idiopathic constipation by colonic dysfunction. Relationship with personality and anxiety. Dig Dis Sci 34:1428–1433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roncoroni L, Sarli L, Costi R, et al. (2000) Anastomose caecorectale antipéristaltique sans torsion du pédicule vasculaire. Ann Chir 125:871–873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Epasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassotti G, Stanghellini V, Chiarioni G, et al. (1996) Upper gastrointestinal motor activity in patients with slow-transit constipation. Further evidence for an enteric neuropathy. Dig Dis Sci 41:1999–2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. (2003) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Gastroenterological Association. (2000) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: guidelines on constipation. Gastroenterology 119:1761–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Marchesi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchesi, F., Sarli, L., Percalli, L. et al. Subtotal Colectomy with Antiperistaltic Cecorectal Anastomosis in the Treatment of Slow-transit Constipation: Long-term Impact on Quality of Life. World J Surg 31, 1658–1664 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9111-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9111-6

Keywords

Navigation