Abstract
Background
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (SCCA) in the treatment of slow-transit constipation, not just in terms of symptom resolution but also the overall impact on patients’ quality of life.
Methods
Between 1991 and 2005, 43 patients underwent SCCA at our institution, 22 for slow-transit constipation (STC) and 21 for other types of colic diffuse disease (non-slow-transit constipation: NSTC), the latter being considered controls. A total of 29 patients (17 affected by STC) were administered a 50-item telephonic questionnaire, including the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Wexner constipation and incontinence scale (WC, WI), and individual willingness to repeat the procedure. Questionnaire data and other parameters such as age, sex, length of follow-up, complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed and compared, in order to evaluate possible correlations between the parameters and their related impact on quality of life, procedural effectiveness in terms of symptomatic regression, qualitative differences related to pathology (constipation versus non-constipation), and surgical approach (laparotomy versus video-laparo-assisted procedure).
Results
There were no procedure-related deaths in this series (mortality: 0%); however, we found two complications in the STC group (9.1%), one requiring reoperation. The GIQLI mean score for the STC group was 115.5 ± 20.5 (mean score for healthy people 125.8 ± 13), and the WC mean score passed from a preoperative value of 20.3 to a postoperative value of 2.6. Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between GIQLI and urgency and abdominal pain, and abdominal pain correlated significantly with pathology (STC). A high number of patients (88.2% in STC) expressed a willingness to repeat the procedure given the same preoperative conditions.
Conclusions
Comparing our results to those of the most homogeneous literature data, SCCA does not appear to be inferior to subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in terms of therapeutic effectiveness, postoperative mortality and morbidity, or overall impact on quality of life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lane WA. (1908) The results of operative treatment of chronic constipation. Br Med J 1:126–130
Fasth S, Hedlund H, Svaninger G, et al. (1983) Functional results after subtotal colectomy and caeco-rectal anastomosis. Acta Chir Scand 149:623–627
Kamm MA, Hawley PR, Lennard-Jones JE. (1988) Outcome of colectomy for severe idiopathic constipation. Gut 29:969–973
Yoshioka K, Keighley MRB. (1989) Clinical results of colectomy for severe constipation. Br J Surg 76:600–604
Nyam DC, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, et al. (1997) Long term result of surgery for chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 40:273–279
Knowles CH, Scott M, Lunniss PJ. (1999) Outcome of colectomy for slow transit constipation. Ann Surg 230:627–638
Athanasakis H, Tsiaoussis J, Vassilakis JS, et al. (2001) Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy for slow transit constipation. Surg Endosc 15:1090–1092
Sarli L, Costi R, Sarli D, et al. (2001) Pilot study of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for the treatment of chronic slow-transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1514–1520
Mollen RM, Kuijpers HC, Claassen AT. (2001) Colectomy for slow-transit constipation: preoperative functional evaluation is important but not a guarantee for a successful outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 44:577–580
Pikarsky AJ, Singh JJ, Weiss EG, et al. (2001) Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing colectomy for colonic inertia. Dis Colon Rectum 44:179–183
Lundin E, Karlbom U, Pahlman L, et al. (2002) Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation. Br J Surg 89:1270–1274
FitzHarris GP, Garcia-Aguilar J, Parker SC, et al. (2003) Quality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation: both quality and quantity count. Dis Colon Rectum 46:433–440
Glia A, Akerlund JE, Lindberg G. (2004) Outcome of colectomy for slow-transit constipation in relation to presence of small-bowel dysmotility. Dis Colon Rectum 47:96–102
Devroede G, Girard G, Bouchoucha M, et al. (1989) Idiopathic constipation by colonic dysfunction. Relationship with personality and anxiety. Dig Dis Sci 34:1428–1433
Roncoroni L, Sarli L, Costi R, et al. (2000) Anastomose caecorectale antipéristaltique sans torsion du pédicule vasculaire. Ann Chir 125:871–873
Epasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222
Bassotti G, Stanghellini V, Chiarioni G, et al. (1996) Upper gastrointestinal motor activity in patients with slow-transit constipation. Further evidence for an enteric neuropathy. Dig Dis Sci 41:1999–2005
Jorge JM, Wexner SD. (2003) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685
American Gastroenterological Association. (2000) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: guidelines on constipation. Gastroenterology 119:1761–1778
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marchesi, F., Sarli, L., Percalli, L. et al. Subtotal Colectomy with Antiperistaltic Cecorectal Anastomosis in the Treatment of Slow-transit Constipation: Long-term Impact on Quality of Life. World J Surg 31, 1658–1664 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9111-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9111-6