Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of Pectoralis Major Myomammary Flap for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Extended Experience

  • Rural and International Surgery
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In the past decade there has been an enormously expanding interest among rural Egyptian patients, relatives, and treating oncologists in post-mastectomy reconstruction as an integral part of patient care. We introduced our technique of pectoralis major myomammary cutaneous flap for single-stage reconstruction of large breasts, nipple, and areola.

Methods

The new technique is based on performing modified radical mastectomy in the classic manner, and then using a pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled flap from the other side in breast reconstruction. The flap is based on the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial artery, and a sector from the medial part of the healthy breast with its overlying skin and a part of the nipple–areola complex is included with the flap. This technique was used in our center in one 118 patients, with very promising results.

Results

Major flap necrosis was not observed in patients treated with this technique, and there were no local recurrences observed during the follow-up period. Excellent cosmetic results were achieved in 49 of the 118 (41.5%) cases.

Conclusion

We recommend this new technique as a single-stage, simple solution for reconstruction of large breasts after mastectomy

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Monroe M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. (2002) Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52:277–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noone RB, Frazier TG, Hayward CZ, et al. (1982) Patient acceptance of immediate reconstruction following mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trabulsy PP, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ (1994) Changing trends in post mastectomy breast reconstruction: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcome using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thoma A, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, et al. (2003) Cost–utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 23:287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nahabedian MY, Manson PN (2002) Contour abnormalities after transverse rectus muscle flap for breast reconstruction; a multifactorial analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edsander-Nord A, Jurell G, Wickman M (1998) Donor site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a prospective and objective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, et al. (1995) Abdominal wall strength, bulge and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hueston JT, Conchie IH (1968) A compound pectoral flap. Aust N Z Surg 38:61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ariyan S (1979) The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap: a versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Denewer A (1997) Myomammary flap of pectoralis major muscle for breast reconstruction: new technique. World J Surg 21:57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Ko CY, et al. (1997) The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Toth BA, Lappert P (1991) Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, et al. (1999) Local recurrence risk after skin sparing and conventional mastectomy; a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adel Denewer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denewer, A., Setit, A. & Farouk, O. Outcome of Pectoralis Major Myomammary Flap for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Extended Experience. World J Surg 31, 1382–1386 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9093-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9093-4

Keywords

Navigation