Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Civilian Extraperitoneal Rectal Gunshot Wounds: Surgical Management Made Simpler

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rectal injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Controversy persists regarding routine presacral drainage, distal rectal washout (DRW), and primary repair of extraperitoneal rectal injuries. This retrospective review was performed to determine the outcome of rectal injuries in an urban trauma center with a high incidence of penetrating trauma where a non-aggressive surgical approach to these injuries is practiced.

Methods

The records of all patients with a full-thickness penetrating rectal injury admitted to the Trauma Center at Groote Schuur Hospital over a 4-year period were reviewed. These were reviewed for demographics, injury mechanism and perioperative management, anatomical site of the rectal injury, associated intra-abdominal injuries and their management. Infectious complications and mortality were noted. Intraperitoneal rectal injuries were primarily repaired, with or without fecal diversion. Extraperitoneal rectal injuries were generally left untouched and a diverting colostomy was done. Presacral drainage and DRW were not routinely performed.

Results

Ninety-two patients with 118 rectal injuries [intraperitoneal (7), extraperitoneal (59), combined (26)] were identified. Only two extraperitoneal rectal injuries were repaired. None had presacral drainage. Eighty-six sigmoid loop colostomies were done. Two (2.2%) fistula, one rectocutaneous, and one rectovesical, were recorded. There were nine (9.9%) infectious complications: surgical site infection (4), buttock abscess (1), buttock necrosis (1), pubic ramus osteitis (1), septic arthritis (2). No perirectal sepsis occurred.

Conclusions

Extraperitoneal rectal injuries due to low-velocity trauma can be safely managed by fecal diversion alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falcone RE, Carey LC (1988) Colorectal trauma. Surg Clin North Am 68:1307–1318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace C (1917) A study of 1200 cases of gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Br J Surg 4:679–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ogilvie WH (1944) Abdominal wounds in the Western Desert. Surg Gynecol Obstet 78:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lavenson GS, Cohen A (1971) Management of rectal injuries. Am J Surg 122:226–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McGrath V, Fabian T, Croce M, et al. (1998) Rectal trauma: management based on anatomic distinctions. Am Surg 12:1136–1141

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weinberg JA, Fabian TC, Magnotti LJ, et al. (2006) Penetrating rectal trauma: management by anatomic distinction improves outcome. J Trauma 60:508–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Navsaria PH, Graham R, Nicol A (2001) A new approach to extraperitoneal rectal injuries: laparosocpy and diverting sigmoid colostomy. J Trauma 51:532–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Navsaria PH, Shaw JM, Zellweger R, et al. (2004) Diagnostic laparosocopy and diverting sigmoid loop colostomy in the management of civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot injuries. Br J Surg 91:460–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivatury RR, Licata J, Gunduz Y, et al. (1991) Management options in penetrating rectal injuries. Am Surg 57:50–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuggle D, Huber PJ (1989) Management of rectal trauma. Am J Surg 148:806–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mangiante EC, Graham A, Fabian T (1986) Rectal gunshot wounds: management of civilian wounds. Surgery 52:37–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burch JM, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL (1989) Colostomy and drainage for civilian rectal injuries. Is that all? Ann Surg 209:600–611

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Velmahos GC, Gomez H, Falabella A, et al. (2000) Operative management of civilian rectal gunshot wounds: simpler is better. World J Surg 24:114–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Levy RD, Strauss P, Aladgem D, et al. (1995) Extraperitoneal gunshot injuries. J Trauma 38:273–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Haas PA, Fox TA (1977) Civilian injuries of the rectum and anus. Dis Col Rect 2:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brunner RG, Shatney CH (1987) Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of rectal trauma. Blunt versus penetrating. Am Surg 53:215–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez RP, Phelan H, Hassan M, et al. (2006) Is fecal diversion necessary for nondestructive penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries. J Trauma 61:815–819

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shannon FL, Moore E, Moore F, et al. (1988) Value of distal colon washout in civilian rectal trauma— reducing gut bacterial translocation. J Trauma 28:989–994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Armstrong RG, Schmidt HJ, Paterson CT (1983) Combat wounds of the extraperitoneal rectum. Surgery 74:570–583

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas DD, Lesion MA, Dykstra BJ, et al. (1990) Management of rectal injuries: dogma vs. practice. Am Surg 56:507–510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bostic PJ, Johnson DA (1993) Management of rectal injuries. J Natl Med Assoc 85:460–463

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gonzales RP, Falimirski M, Holevar R (1998) The role of presacral drainage in the management of penetrating rectal trauma. J Trauma 45:656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Franko ER, Ivatury RR, Schwalb DM (1993) Combined penetrating rectal and genitourinary injuries: a challenge in management. J Trauma 34:347–353

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Trunkey D, Hays RJ, Shires GT (1973) Management of rectal trauma. J Trauma 13:411–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Levine JH, Longo W, Pruitt C, et al. (1996) Management of selected rectal injuries by primary repair. Am J Surg 172:575–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinig JP, Boyd CR (1996) Presacral drainage in penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries: is it necessary. Am Surg 62:765–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Morken JJ, Kraatz J, Balcos EG, et al. (1999) Civilian rectal trauma: a changing perspective. Surgery 126:693–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Trauma Center, Trauma Unit – C14 Groote Schuur Hospital, and Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 7925

    Pradeep H. Navsaria, Sorin Edu & Andrew J. Nicol

Authors
  1. Pradeep H. Navsaria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sorin Edu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew J. Nicol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep H. Navsaria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Navsaria, P.H., Edu, S. & Nicol, A.J. Civilian Extraperitoneal Rectal Gunshot Wounds: Surgical Management Made Simpler. World J Surg 31, 1347–1353 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9045-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9045-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation