Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Giant Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Single Institution Experience

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RS) are a rare group of malignant soft-tissue tumors; due to the flexibility of the retroperitoneum, they generally grow to a large size before becoming symptomatic, often involving surrounding structures. Therefore, the surgeon is frequently compelled to perform large excisions. The aim of this study is to assess clinical and pathological factors affecting prognosis in patients with RS who underwent surgical treatment, comparing giant forms (size ≥ 25 cm) with smaller ones (size < 25 cm).

Methods

The hospital records of 73 consecutive patients who underwent surgical exploration for primary RS at our unit between 1984 and 2003 were reviewed. Statistical analysis of factors influencing overall and disease-free survival was performed including both the whole group of patients and only those who underwent complete surgical resection.

Results

Giant RS showed a lower resectability rate than smaller forms (54.2% vs. 84.2%, P = 0.005). In the group with complete surgical excision (51 out of 73), patients with giant RS had a higher rate of adjacent organ resection compared with the smaller ones (84.2% vs. 53.1%, P = 0.023). Tumor size did not influence prognosis: after complete resection, 5-year overall survival was 60.9% and 56.3% for giant RS and smaller forms respectively, while 5-year disease-free survival was 54.3% and 48.3% for the two groups respectively. Advanced stage, incomplete gross surgical resection, higher tumor grade, non-liposarcoma histology and microscopic infiltration of margins were found to be significantly negative prognostic factors.

Conclusions

The present study confirms the importance of aggressive surgical management for RS, in order to offer these patients the best chance of long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dalton RR, Donohue JH, Mucha P Jr, et al. Management of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Surgery 1989;106:725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Malerba M, Doglietto GB, Pacelli F, et al. Primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: results of aggressive surgical treatment. World J Surg 1999;23:670–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis JJ, Leung D, Woodruff JM, et al. Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma. Analysis of 500 patients treated and followed at a single institution. Ann Surg 1998;228:355–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hassan I, Park SZ, Donohue JH, et al. Operative management of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas. A reappraisal of an institutional experience. Ann Surg 2004;239:244–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuhaus SJ, Barry P, Clark MA, et al. Surgical management of primary and recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Br J Surg 2005;92:246–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gronchi A, Casali PG, Fiore M, et al. Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. Patterns of recurrence in 167 patients treated at a single institution. Cancer 2004;100:2448–2455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Dalen T, Hennipman A, Van Coevorden F, et al. Evaluation of a clinically applicable post-surgical classification system for primary retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mendenhall WM, Zlotecki RA, Hochwald SN, et al. Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 2005;104:669–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley JC, Caplan R. Giant retroperitoneal sarcoma: a case report and review of the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Am Surg 2002;68:52–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Russo P, Kim Y, Ravindran S, et al. Nephrectomy during operative management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4:421–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Catton CN, O’Sullivan B, Kotwall C, et al. Outcome and prognosis in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994;29(5):1005–1010

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi CR, Nitti D, Foletto M, et al. Management of primary sarcomas of the retroperitoneum. Eur J Surg Oncol 1993;19(4):355–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Pacelli MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doglietto, G.B., Tortorelli, A.P., Papa, V. et al. Giant Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Single Institution Experience. World J Surg 31, 1047–1054 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0433-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0433-6

Keywords

Navigation