Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic Sensitivity of Contrast Swallow for Leakage after Gastric Resection

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We examined the clinical manifestations and computed tomography findings of patients with leakage after gastrectomy for cancer and determined the sensitivity of the contrast swallow for the leakage diagnosis.

Methods

The medical records of 331 consecutive patients undergoing gastrectomy between January 1992 and December 2003 were reviewed. Routine contrast swallow was performed in all patients before oral intake. Once leakage was suspected, an emergency contrast swallow was performed and its diagnostic sensitivity determined.

Results

In total, leakage was diagnosed 9 of 17 times by the contrast swallow, for a diagnostic sensitivity of 53%. The clinical signs or another imaging modality often corrected the misdiagnosis.

Conclusions

The diagnostic sensitivity of contrast swallow for leakage after gastrectomy was low. Therefore, if we employ the contrast swallow technique, we should keep in mind its low sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ichikawa D, Kurioka H, Yamaguchi T, et al. Postoperative complications following gastrectomy for gastric cancer during the last decade. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:613–617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C, et al. Management and results of proximal anastomotic leakages in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000;26:168–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Csendes A, Diaz JC, Burdiles P, et al. Classification and treatment of anastomotic leakage after extended total gastrectomy in gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 1990;37(Suppl 2):174–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peel ALG, Taylor EW. Proposed definition for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1991;73:385–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamb PJ, Griffin SM, Chandrashekar MV, et al. Prospective study of routine contrast radiology after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1015–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim KW, Choi BI, Han JK, et al. Postoperative anatomic and pathologic findings at CT following gastrectomy. Radiographics 2002;22:323–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2001;88:1157–1168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodfield CA, Levine MS. The postoperative stomach. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:341–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masato Kusunoki MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tonouchi, H., Mohri, Y., Tanaka, K. et al. Diagnostic Sensitivity of Contrast Swallow for Leakage after Gastric Resection. World J. Surg. 31, 128–131 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0246-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0246-7

Keywords

Navigation