Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Metastasis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to identify useful prognostic factors in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

The records of 36 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Potential clinicopathological prognostic factors that may affect survival were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

There was no mortality. Overall survival rates were 75%, 54%, and 50% for 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively (median survival time, 26 months). Univariate analysis found that age (≧ 65 years), pancreatic invasion, duodenal invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion and a positive surgical margin were significant predictors of poor prognosis (P < 0.05). Furthermore, lymph node metastasis was found to be a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis by multivariate analysis (P = 0.043). Moreover, there were significant differences in the 5-year survival between patients with 2 or less involved lymph nodes and those with 3 or more positive nodes (P < 0.001). There were no 2-year survivors of the group of patients with 3 or more positive nodes.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the presence and number of lymph nodes exhibiting metastatic disease might be useful in predicting the postsurgical outcome in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg 1996;224:463–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hejna M, Pruckmayer M, Raderer M. The role of chemotherapy and radiation in the management of biliary cancer: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:977–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yee K, Sheppard BC, Domreis J, et al. Cancers of the gallbladder and biliary ducts. Oncology (Williston Park) 2002;16:939–957

    Google Scholar 

  4. Park SW, Park YS, Chung JB, et al. Patterns and relevant factors of tumor recurrence for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma after radical resection. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:1612–1618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A, et al. Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer. Arch Surg 2002;137:69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasaki R, Takahashi M, Funato O, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node involvement in middle and distal bile duct cancer. Surgery 2001;129:677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suzuki M, Unno M, Oikawa M, et al. Surgical treatment and postoperative outcomes for middle and lower bile duct carcinoma in Japan: experience of a single institute. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:650–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ohta T, et al. Role of nodal involvement and the periductal soft-tissue margin in middle and distal bile duct cancer. Ann Surg 1999;229:76–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zerbi A, Balzano G, Leone BE, et al. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and survival of resected distal bile duct cancer. Dig Surg 1998;15:410–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wade TP, Prasad CN, Virgo KS, et al. Experience with distal bile duct cancers in U.S. Veterans Affairs hospitals: 1987–1991. J Surg Oncol 1997;64:242–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Lin E, et al. Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1712–1715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagorney DM, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, et al. Outcomes after curative resections of cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg 1993;128:871–877

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakamoto Y, Kosuge T, Shimada K, et al. Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer: an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins. Surgery 2005;137:396–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reding R, Buard JL, Lebeau G, et al. Surgical management of 552 carcinomas of the extrahepatic bile ducts (gallbladder and periampullary tumors excluded). Results of the French Surgical Association Survey. Ann Surg 1991;213:236–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Washburn WK, Lewis WD, Jenkins RL. Aggressive surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg 1995;130:270–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoenthaler R, Phillips TL, Castro J, et al. Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. The University of California at San Francisco experience. Ann Surg 1994;219:267–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guthrie CM, Haddock G, De Beaux AC, et al. Changing trends in the management of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 1993;80:1434–1439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. General rules for surgical and pathological studies on cancer of biliary tract, 4th edition. Tokyo, Kanehara, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. Inoue K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2000;127:498–505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, et al. Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2003;238:720–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Aretxabala X, Roa I, Burgos L, et al. Gallbladder cancer: an analysis of a series of 139 patients with invasion restricted to the subserosal layer. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, editors. Internatinal Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N, et al. Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 2005;29:728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong SM, Cho H, Lee OJ, et al. The number of metastatic lymph nodes in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as a prognostic factor. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1177–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roder JD, Schneider PM, Stein HJ, et al. Number of lymph node metastases is significantly associated with survival in patients with radically resected carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Br J Surg 1995;82:1693–1696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alberts SR, Al-Khatib H, Mahoney MR, et al. Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in advanced biliary tract and gallbladder carcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial. Cancer 2005;103:111–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Penz M, Kornek GV, Raderer M, et al. Phase II trial of two-weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Ann Oncol 2001;12:183–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiaki Murakami MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murakami, Y., Uemura, K., Hayashidani, Y. et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Metastasis. World J. Surg. 31, 337–342 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0224-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0224-0

Keywords

Navigation