Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Analysis of Infection after Polypropylene Mesh Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernia

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 January 2007

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of superficial and prosthetic mesh infection following polypropylene mesh repair of different abdominal wall hernia in individual patients and to analyze the manifestation, clinical process and outcomes in patients with prosthetic mesh infection.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 375 patients with 423 implanted meshes for groin, femoral, umbilical, incisional and epigastric hernias, with a mean follow-up of 15 months (range: 3–73 months).

Results

The total superficial infection rate was 1.65% percnt;, and the rate of mesh infection was 0.94% percnt;. There were no statistically significant differences in prosthetic mesh infection between monofilament and multifilament meshes as well as between the different repair groups of hernias. The deep incisional surgical site infection after previous operation was established as a significant risk factor for prosthetic mesh infection in incisional hernia repair (P < 0.0001). Five cases of prosthetic mesh infection were presented and analyzed.

Conclusions

There is no correlation between the superficial and prosthetic mesh infection. There may be difficulties in determining mesh infection and to choose the right tactic. The reconvalescence in all patients with mesh infection was achieved only after removal of the infected mesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Managram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rios A, Rodríguez JM, Munitiz V, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in incisional hernia repair using a prosthesis. Hernia 2001;5:148–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor EW, Duffy K, Lee K, et al. Surgical site infection after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 2004;91:105–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aufenacker TJ, van Geldere D, van Mesdag T, et al. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after Lichtenstein open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 2004;240:955–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuzu MA, Hazinedaroğlu S, Dolalan S, et al. Prevention of surgical site infection after open prosthetic inguinal hernia repair: Efficacy of parenteral versus oral prophylaxis with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 2005;29:794–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biswas S. Elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh: Is there a need for antibiotic prophylaxis? A review. World J Surg 2005;29:830–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aufenacker TJ, Koelemay MJ, Gouma DJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia. Br J Surg 2006;93:5–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mann DV, Prout J, Havranek E, et al. Late-onset deep prosthetic infection following mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 1998;176:12–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor SG, O’Dwyer PJ. Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg 1999;86:562–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephenson B. Complications of open groin hernia repairs. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1255–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11:3–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Avtan L, Avci C, Bulut T, et al. Mesh infections after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;7:192–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foschi D, Corsi F, Cellerino P, et al. Late rejection of the mesh after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 1998;12:455–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofbauer C, Andersen PV, Juul P, et al. Late mesh rejection as a complication to transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Enosc 1998;12:1164–1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ismail W, Agrawal A, Zia MI. Fate of chronic infected onlay mesh in groin wound. Hernia 2002;6:79–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, et al. Biomaterials for abdominal wall hernia surgery and principles of their applications. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1994;379:168–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Demiter S, Geçim IE, Aydinuraz K, et al. Affinity of Staphylococcus epidermidis to various prosthetic graft materials. J Surg Res 2001;99:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leber GE, Garb JL, Ajexander AI, et al. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 1998;133:378–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris-Stiff GJ, Hughes LE. The outcomes of nonabsorbable mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: literature review and clinical experience. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:352–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Costanza MJ, Heniford BT, Arca MJ, et al. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias. Am Surg 1998;64:1121–1127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramshaw BJ, Esartia P, Schwab J, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 1999;65:827–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, et al. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:645–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, et al. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001;386:65–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berger D, Bientzle M, Müller A. Postoperative complications after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1720–1723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2004;91:44–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Conze J, Kingsnorth AN, Flament JB, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 2005;92:1488–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Paajanen H. A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes (lightweight or heavyweight polypropylene and Vypro II® mesh) on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anaesthesia. ISW 2005, Durban, South Africa, Abstract ID 2346

  28. Deysine M. Pathophysiology, prevention and management of prosthetic infections in hernia surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1998;78:1105–1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Matthews MR, Caruso DM, Tsujimura RB, et al. Ventral hernia synthetic mesh repair infected by Mycobacterium fortuitum. Am Surg 1999;65:1035–1037

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wantz GE, Chevrel JP, Flament JB, et al. Incisional hernia: the problem and the cure. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Petersen S, Henke G, Freitag M, et al. Deep prosthesis infection in incisional hernia repair: predictive factors and clinical outcome. Eur J Surg 2001;167:453–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Favole AS, Chaparala RPC, Ambrose NS. Fate of the inguinal hernia following removal of infected prosthetic mesh. Hernia 2006;10:58–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stringer RA, Salameh JR. Mesh herniorrhaphy during elective colorectal surgery. Hernia 2005;9:26–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Dreau D, et al. The susceptibility of prosthetic biomaterials to infection. Surg Endosc 2005;19:430–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the European Social Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Latvian Maritime Medical Hospital, University of Latvia, 23 Patversmes Street, Riga, 1005, Latvia

    Arnolds Jezupors MD & Māris Mihelsons PhD

Authors
  1. Arnolds Jezupors MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Māris Mihelsons PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnolds Jezupors MD.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-4001-x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jezupors, A., Mihelsons, M. The Analysis of Infection after Polypropylene Mesh Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernia. World J. Surg. 30, 2270–2278 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0130-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0130-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation