Abstract
There are now five classic steps for analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic medical decision-making policies: (1) formulate a clear clinical question based on a particular patient’s problem; (2) search the literature for relevant clinical articles; (3) evaluate the evidence for its validity and usefulness; (4) implement useful findings into clinical practice; (5) audit the validity of the process. The clinician must have the necessary skills to appraise critically the information retrieved. Rather than focusing on the discussion and conclusion sections of articles, the reader should concentrate on the review of the methods and results sections to formulate an opinion regarding the strength of evidence presented in the paper. The process is intellectually demanding and difficult to achieve. This particular step in the validation of evidence implies that each clinician must be methodologically and statistically sound, an “expert,” capable of analyzing the method used in that particular publication to achieve the published result.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
InstitutionalAuthorNameEvidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) ArticleTitleEvidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine J.A.M.A. 268 2420–2425
G Guyatt B Haynes R Jaeschke et al. (2000) ArticleTitleUsers’ guides to medical literature. XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users’ guides to patient care J.A.M.A. 284 1290–1296 Occurrence Handle10979117
D Sackett W Rosenberg M Gray et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEvidence based medicine what is it and what isn’t B.M.J. 312 71–72
W Rosenberg A. Donald (1995) ArticleTitleEvidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem solving B.M.J. 312 1122–1126
J. McCormick (1996) ArticleTitleDeath of the personal doctor Lancet 348 667 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03512-X Occurrence Handle8782760
HJ. Kreder (1999) ArticleTitleEvidence-based surgical practice: what is it and do we need it? World J Surg. 23 1232–1235
JL. Meakins (2002) ArticleTitleInnovation in surgery: the rules of evidence Am. J. Surg. 183 399–405 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00825-5 Occurrence Handle11975927
A Reitsma J. Moreno (2002) ArticleTitleEthical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier? J Am. Coll. Surg. 194 792–801 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01153-5
S Horng F. Miller (2002) ArticleTitleIs placebo surgery unethical? N Engl. Med. 347 137–139 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMsb021025
N. Black (1999) ArticleTitleEvidence-based surgery: a passing fad? World J Surg. 23 789–793
R. McLeod (1999) ArticleTitleIssues in surgical randomized controlled trials World J. Surg. 23 1210–1214 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900649 Occurrence Handle10552108
InstitutionalAuthorNameMedical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Party (2002) ArticleTitleSurgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 359 1727–1733
JF Bosset M Gignoux JP Triboulet et al. (1997) ArticleTitleChemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous cell cancer of the esophagus N. Engl. J. Med. 337 161–167 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199707173370304 Occurrence Handle9219702
JS Macdonald SR Smalley J Benedetti et al. (2001) ArticleTitleChemotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction N. Eng. J. Med. 345 725–730 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa010187
JP Neoptolemos JA Dunn DD Stocken et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAdjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 358 1576–1585 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06651-X Occurrence Handle11716884
JP Neoptolemos DD H Stocken Friess et al. (2004) ArticleTitleA randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 350 1200–1210 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa032295 Occurrence Handle15028824
E Kapiteijn CAM Marijnen ID Nagtegaal et al. (2001) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision (TME) with or without preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer: prospective randomised trial with standard operative and histopathological techniques N. Engl. J. Med. 345 638–645 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa010580 Occurrence Handle11547717
E Touboul L Buffat JF Minne et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLocoregional recurrence of adenocarcinomas of the rectum treated with irradiation combined with or without excision surgery Cancer Radiother. 3 39–50 Occurrence Handle10083862
M Huguier S Houry A. Barrier (2001) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of cancer of the rectum Am. J. Surg. 182 437–439 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00748-6 Occurrence Handle11754847
A Fingerhut JM Hay B Millat et al. (1998) ArticleTitleGeneral and gastrointestinal tract surgery in France Arch. Surg. 133 568–574 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.5.568 Occurrence Handle9605922
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacaine, F. Evidence-based Medicine in Surgical Decision Making. World J. Surg. 29, 588–591 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7918-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7918-6