Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical Outcomes for Gastric Cancer in the Upper Third of the Stomach

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The proportion of gastric cancers affecting the upper third of the stomach has been increasing. At our surgical service we perform total and proximal gastrectomy for this condition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical outcome of the two operative procedures and determine an optimal surgical approach.

Methods

Data from 147 patients who underwent resection for gastric cancer affecting the proximal one-third of the stomach were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into a total gastrectomy (TG) group or a proximal gastrectomy (PG) group, and the clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical results were compared. We analyzed survival rates using Kaplan-Meier methods and made comparisons using a log-rank test across the same stage of the gastric cancer.

Results

From 1992 to 2000, a total of 104 total gastrectomies and 43 proximal gastrectomies for gastric cancer affecting the upper one-third of the stomach were performed. Our investigation revealed significantly different clinicopathologic characteristics in Borrmann type, length of the resection margin, degree of lymph node dissection, and lymph node stage. During the procedure, a combined resection of other organs was performed in 30 TG and 27 PG patients. Postoperative complications developed in 15 TG and 22 PG patients. The cancer recurrence rate was 4.8% for the TG group and 39.5% for the PG group; it was highest when the length of the proximal resection margin was < 1 cm. When we compared 5-year survival rates between the two groups, each at the same cancer stage, a significant difference was noted for stage III and IV gastric cancers.

Conclusions

Proximal gastrectomy may be performed during the early stage of proximal gastric cancer; but because of the high frequency of complications and cancer recurrence, an additional procedure should be expected afterward. When the cancer stage is advanced, total gastrectomy should be performed with sufficient length of the proximal resection margin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery 1998;123:127–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Powell J, McConkey CC. Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and adjacent sites. Br J Cancer 1990;62:440–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ryu KW, Kim CS, Goo BH. Clinicopathologic characteristics of and prognosis for proximal gastric carcinoma. J Korean Surg Soc 2000;59:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isguder AS, Nazli O, Tansug T, et al. Total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2005;52:302–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jakl RJ, Miholic J, Koller R, et al. Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the cardia. Am J Surg 1995;169:316–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Forni E, Borri AM, Zadra F, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the proximal stomach and cardia: problems of surgical strategy and technics. Chir Ital 1984;36:603–619

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Solerio D, Camandona M, Gasparri G, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the cardia: surgical strategies compared. Tumori 2003;89:143–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aitaliev MS, Zemlianoi VP, Nepomniashchaia SL. Evaluation of surgical traumaticity of standard and extended surgical procedures in cancer of a proximal part of the stomach. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2005;(3):23–26

  9. Kitano S, Shiraishi N. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors. Surg Clin North Am 2005;85:151–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2003;6:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S, et al. Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. World J Surg 2002;26:1150–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Piso P, Werner U, Lang H, et al. Proximal versus distal gastric carcinoma—what are the differences? Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:520–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Csendes A, Burdiles P, Rojas J, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing D2 total gastrectomy versus D2 total gastrectomy plus splenectomy in 187 patients with gastric carcinoma. Surgery 2002;131:401–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weitz J, Jaques DP, Brennan M, et al. Association of splenectomy with postoperative complications in patients with proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:682–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakaguchi T, Sawada H, Yamada Y, et al. Indication of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma involving the proximal part of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48:603–605

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Katai H, Sano T, Fukagawa T, et al. Prospective study of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 2003;90:850–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kameyama J, Ishida H, Yasaku Y, et al. Proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by interposition of a jejunal pouch. Surgical technique. Eur J Surg 1993;159:491–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adachi Y, Inoue T, Hagino Y, et al. Surgical results of proximal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: jejunal interposition and gastric tube reconstruction. Gastric Cancer 1999;2:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Nishida S, et al. The operative indications for proximal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Surg Today 1997;27:993–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ito H, Clancy TE, Osteen RT, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: what is the optimal surgical approach? J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Volpe CM, Driscoll DL, Miloro SM, et al. Survival benefit of extended D2 resection for proximal gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 1997;64:231–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang XF, Lu HS, Yin FZ.A comparative study of therapeutic effects of total versus proximal subtotal gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 1994;16:447–450

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Suk Kim MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.H., Park, S.S., Kim, J. et al. Surgical Outcomes for Gastric Cancer in the Upper Third of the Stomach. World J. Surg. 30, 1870–1876 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0703-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0703-8

Keywords

Navigation